"The corporations, not the individuals made money."
That is as stupid as saying "I'm not earning money, my bank account is."

"So why should individuals have to pay when the corporations reaped the benefits?"
A corporation only exists virtually, its not a real person. But the persons who control it, are real, and responsible.

"Besides, under U.S. law, a corporation is a person."
Those laws are pragmatic laws not made by god. (spoken as an atheist, maybe our opinion differs). But that's what I meant when I said "impossible."

"who want a fair world which never existed and never will."
I'm not a leftish but as a comment, its the only option for survival of humankind. Its the only option but I don't believe in it so I think human race is destined to die out.

Not the companies or gov but the ones who ordered it inside those companies. Otherwise you let someone else pay for what they did not do. I know its impossible but that's how it should be.

succes ermee.

No other fremen?

"1)  when everybody has a voice by being given the option to vote on a leader then that leader has to do what the majority voted him/her in for"
its called oppresion of majority. Even a pro-democratic system like me does not deny that.

"2)  when everybody has a voice by being given the option to vote on a leader then that leader can do whatever he/she wants since the majority trust (or at the very least, distrust him/her less than the other voting options) him/her to do what he/she thinks is best for them"
Now you are talking about the control system right? Let me get this straight: if you trust a politician you are out of your mind unless you know the guy personally.:p

"I see no one wants to answer that.
I wonder why."
Me too . Anyway, I gave it a good shot, even if I only posted only half of it today.

@phoenix:
Nail on the head. I was about to start posting about it btw, but I don't have any spare time today.

*LP hides in disgust*

"Sory for the engrish. If you don't understand something, I'll try again happily."
I talk engrish myself as it is my fourth language. When I said you make a lot of sence, it wasn't ment ironic.

"As for Romney, I do think he would have appeared as a perfect target for the "more of the same" attack"
he had very conservative points compered to McCain.

"plus all the nice things you can recycle from the primaries."
thats true idd.

@yell:
I think its a good strategy to pick a conservative, and yes the women-vote is gonna convice some. But Mitt Romney would have had even more effect with the conservatives and ok the women vote but he would have been a charismatic vice and not just some side-kick. And a much better vice overal...

wouldn't be georgia. Anyway, you seem unwilling to react to my claim?