1,076 Reply by Torqez

(378 replies, posted in General)

Poley wrote:

Congrats townies! And didnt things go smoother when Flint died last round also? tongue

We hung in there till the end! It would have been an interesting game if Freezy was actually lynched earlier, since both SSL and Remo were gaining trust on the townie side smile

GW Oxy for being the middle man this round, though next time it would be nice of you to fill me in a touch earlier than you did tongue

Awesome playing under the radar from Keerb as our last cop!

WC, YF and myself as the decoys in the end. Tia for bringing it home!

Gwynnedd, hope you die earlier next round so i dont need to bother trying to convince you Im town for like a 4th game in a row tongue

TBO, why so stupid? tongue

Rest of you townies for sitting on your ass and not chatting in #mafia, boo! Those of you in roles, dont die so early next time (other than you Flint big_smile)

and of course Nolio/Torqez/ER for of course picking 6/6 mobbys before the game was a 1/4 of the way through big_smile

and the biggest thanks for leading us to the win goes to Gen for graciously dying night1! \o/


+1. Nice post

Go to forum: General

1,077 Reply by Torqez

(62 replies, posted in Universal News)

Actually I would have loved to war now.  Hence why we cancelled.

Friends in all fams.  So we coulda duked it out, had fun.  Renapped and then fought again later.  Doesn't have to be just the one war in a round.

Anyway, 70/80 didn't want to fight this time round.  So they made us an offer to re-instate - which we accepted.

Nothing more to it really.

Go to forum: Universal News

1,078 Reply by Torqez

(49 replies, posted in Feedback)

Awesome stuff Pie, on the polls.

You changed the forums.  But all what was apparent was just a different look.  (There was a lot of benefits behind the scenes though, ofcourse).

But seeing the Polls make a comeback, we can now see material gain from your hard efforts!! Great work! <3

Go to forum: Feedback

1,079 Reply by Torqez

(7 replies, posted in Questions)

Altruist wrote:
Stan wrote:

http://imperialconflict.com/changelog.php here is the link if ur not ingame

Thanks.
But this link leads automatically to the login prompt. It seems only to work when you have already joined a galaxy. The forum login doesn't seem to be sufficient. So... same problem.

You don't need to be in a galaxy to access that.  But you do need to be logged into your Master Account. 

It's a good point though, that requirement should probably be removed and made it so that even Guests can view it.

Go to forum: Questions

1,080 Reply by Torqez

(20 replies, posted in Ideas)

I like pie wrote:

If I'm active nearly 24/7 but 3 of my players aren't, what advantage do I have as a family?  This doesn't take away the edge of being active, it lessens the burden of having inactives in your fam, which is a good thing imo.

Aha! Now you're heading towards my idea.  Which suggests that IC needs to move towards Solo play.

Yes, we need to retain the family concept somehow - but my idea is that people need to be wholly responsible for their own empires and inactivity of others, shouldn't affect your own performance.

Go to forum: Ideas

1,081 Reply by Torqez

(378 replies, posted in General)

Yay gratz town smile ..gj, got there in the end. 

Hard considering it was 2 mob teams.  And we made a lot of mistakes tongue

Thx for hosting NicknArby!

Go to forum: General

1,082 Reply by Torqez

(21 replies, posted in Ideas)

=]

Go to forum: Ideas

1,083 Reply by Torqez

(6 replies, posted in Ideas)

Personally, I think losing the DS itself is a big penalty.

Don't need to penalise people for losing further planets or whatever.  Sometimes you have your tiny guys in there, just sitting there doing nothing.  Why should they lose planets?

And the aggressor has also invested a bit to kill the DS, he's also lost fleet to it.  Making him have to rexplore the planets (or worse), seems to be overkill.

It's a nice idea from an RPG point of view though tongue

Go to forum: Ideas

1,084 Reply by Torqez

(20 replies, posted in Ideas)

I like pie wrote:

Put it this way, if activity requires dependency on something that could be automated, isn't that activity inherently thoughtless anyway?

Nope, because where do you draw the line?

According to what you wrote, if i lost a planet and am not online to send a retake.  Does that mean the game should automatically send a retake for me, given I would have sent it anyway if I was online?

Go to forum: Ideas

1,085 Reply by Torqez

(21 replies, posted in Ideas)

I like pie wrote:
Reindeer wrote:
I like pie wrote:

No problem!  And check out it out, nested quotes!  Huzzah!

Triple nesting. Because I can!

This is gonna get out of hand quick.

I think you can set a limit somewhere, to the number of nests.

Go to forum: Ideas

1,086 Reply by Torqez

(19 replies, posted in Bugs)

It only did this before, Insane + Remo, if you hadn't selected (read, clicked into) the frame.  If you had nothing selected, then the frame would be the default, so at that point refreshing would take you back to HQ.

Now though, clicking anywhere means reload just puts it to HQ.

The real question is though ...why do you want to reload? tongue ...Just click the link again, easier! tongue

Go to forum: Bugs

1,087 Reply by Torqez

(8 replies, posted in Bugs)

Tbh, I think our new Forum is smarter than it appears...

First it bans Chomp, and then it forgets you.

Brilliant!

Go to forum: Bugs

1,088 Reply by Torqez

(8 replies, posted in Bugs)

Yea, we know it exists for a while.

It's just that, that "some point" hasn't quite arrived yet tongue

Go to forum: Bugs

1,089 Reply by Torqez

(8 replies, posted in Bugs)

Yep, something screwey here.

Try sidebar such as Primavera.  Should at least let you use Toggle.  But yea, the problem is deeper which hopefully will be looked at, at some point.

Go to forum: Bugs

1,090 Reply by Torqez

(2 replies, posted in Ideas)

You won't believe ..but I asked the same thing a few hours before your post today tongue

Adding it to my To Do list and bumping it up in priority.  Pretty important to have an up-to-date FAQ, and easily accessible!

Stay tuned + Added tagpoint smile

Go to forum: Ideas

1,091 Reply by Torqez

(378 replies, posted in General)

Awesome =]

Seems the hardwork in the beginning paid off!

Go to forum: General

1,092 Reply by Torqez

(36 replies, posted in General)

24 hrs!

go go go

Go to forum: General

1,093 Reply by Torqez

(5 replies, posted in Questions)

> Undeath wrote:

> To clarify, oxy didn't create it.  I believe it is just the PunBB default.


Pretty sure that was just a troll.

Go to forum: Questions

1,094 Reply by Torqez

(62 replies, posted in Universal News)

> God of Legends wrote:

> hahaha, dfsf you are an absolute moron.

The ticker on your HQ is as good a cancellation as you need hahaha.

Stop whining and lets see a good first major war!



Josh just likes being pedantic (among other things).  Naturally, it backfired on him with Lee's response:

<Lee> says nothing about each fam has to send there own cancelation

^ As per the above 78 fulfilled all requirements for a proper cancellation.  Hell, I even posted this thread at the same time.

Go to forum: Universal News

1,095 Reply by Torqez

(62 replies, posted in Universal News)

lol, we havn't hit/farmed ANYONE this round.  We've just grown through activity.  Everyone in our alliance is seasoned, and loves to fight.

If we attack lower fams, we're farmers.
If we cancel on the next biggest alliance, we suck, cos we're doing it too early?

lol

Do the math...

1     Its A Toy Story (7878) [98,76]     782     6457588     32880
8     Mixed numbers (7884) [7,43]     555     2976052     17759
vs
2     Look how pretty Pickle is! (7870) [20,32]     850     5130303     30310
7     Duck Dynasty (7880) [17,10]     663     3833108     22039

78/84 NW = 9,433,640 Networth
70/80 NW = 8,963,411 Networth

78/84 Planets = 1,337 Planets
70/80 Planet s= 1,513 Planets

If anything, this is as even as it gets.

Go to forum: Universal News

1,096 Topic by Torqez

(62 replies, posted in Universal News)

"Alright, suit up boys!" announced the Rampant Rabbit. "With this 'clean' cover, they'll never know what hit em and what our true identities really are!".

With that signal, the Mixed Toys gathered and charged out.  Some were vibrating ...others just singing along.  However, all had a mission! They reached upon the enemies and swarmed em en masse.

"Hold on!! Lets spare this one! He seems to be be in line with what we need!" the Toy Soldier pointed at Lust, who was surrounded by all their sin.

Lust looked around with, jaw wide open.  So many mixed toys! ...and all ....pleasureable!

"No! We take no prisoners!"

And so it began...the Tale of the Mixed Toys vs the Duckly Sins..

Go to forum: Universal News

1,097 Reply by Torqez

(17 replies, posted in Bugs)

Yep, I confirm that you are a recurring issue.

Go to forum: Bugs

1,098 Reply by Torqez

(1 replies, posted in Questions)

Yes

Go to forum: Questions

1,099 Reply by Torqez

(98 replies, posted in General)

16:46    Nolio:    I hate Luster!
16:47    I_like_pie:    agreed

Go to forum: General

1,100 Topic by Torqez

(0 replies, posted in Announcements)

The current Imperial Conflict Team, consists of the following:

Honorary Squirrel

* Stefan

Administrator

* I_like_pie

Moderators

* KT
* Undeath
* Zarf BeebleBrix

Click on a staff member's name to send them a Private Message through the Forums smile

Go to forum: Announcements