526

(21 replies, posted in General)

Unlike the other people who genuinely believe our six billion co-residents of planet Earth want to hear our every opinion and thought, I was unfazed by the passing of my thirtieth birthday, more of an 'Oh! I'm thirty.' than an 'Oh no! I'm thirty!' moment. I think this stems from the fact that my generation, Generation X as we were called, never really went away.

  Unlike the members of preceeding generations I can listen to "underground" music and go to "underground" gigs without looking like a paedophile who doesn't have whatever it takes to prey on anything too young to drink, and I can do this because what is "underground" has not changed one iota.

  I still pretend I liked [insert a "The ___" band here] the way they were before they "sold out" and became popular even though I have only just heard of them, I still choose my bands, musicians and genres according to how obscure they are, I still pretend I don't find the latest pop music sensation toe-tap-worthy, I still pretend I don't find the the latest 18 year old neo-paedophillic neo-pop-alternative starlet attractive, I still kid myself into thinking I'm an individual, I still get called names by small middle-class white boys wearing silver bulldog chains that are faker than their supuh-gangstuh-nigguh accents because I'm not like them, their only friend, or their salmon-pink, overweight skinhead dad in an extra large football shirt, and therfore must be "Gay" "Emo" or "One o' them Goffs that like dead stuff, innit".

  I also still watch cartoons and childrens television over soap operas and "family entertainment" shows, I play games over doing something serious and productive, I still eat soil for some odd reason, and I still see the worlds problems in that oddly logical and sensible way that most humans seem to lose midway though puberty.
  Through no conscious effort I have somehow avoided being pigeon-holed or put into a demographic.


  Then I saw an advert for a compilation album called "Back to the 90's" which features all of the popular music I pretended to hate during my teenage years, and with that one small event Father Time, in conjunction with some cold-hearted advertising bastards, rubber-stamped the word "old" onto my forhead.
  The world has decided, in it's infinite wisdom, that I am now old enough for my own compilation album, something which, until recently, was reserved for people who remember "the war", know words that you can't find in a dictionary any more, and still don't understand why they can't call their Black Labrador "[something that can't be used because it would violate the rules]".


  But I am not down-hearted. To be honest, the more I think about it the more I think the world can "get bent" or "jog on" (preferrably both), as this decision has probably been made by the same people who decided that pre-teen girls were old enough for their own line of padded bras, the same people who decided that nine year old girls should also be able to wear "wonderbum" jeans with "Sexy" written accross the cheeks, the same people who are responsible for boy bands that seem to be designed to sell sex to children who still think writing X92 on a foggy street-facing window is the pinnacle of funny, the same people who introduced "heroin chic" to the already bulimic, insecurity-riddled world of fasion, and the same people who are trying to guilt-trip any selfish, still alive bastard over the age of fifty into selling their house so their ungrateful, selfish, middle-management children don't have to pay for a funeral that should still be thirty years away.


  So does this mean that I am now consciously choosing to not "grow up", that I am now consciously choosing non-conformity and all black clothes, gowns and suits and a hairstyle that makes me stand out like a tropical fish in a goldfish bowl?
I don't know, and I don't care, because either way I am not going to buy that damned album, or anything else by those people who are bombarding me with adverts designed to make me vulnerable enough to allow them access to my money like I'm some middle eastern country with an untapped oil reserve.


  Or, to put it another, much shorter way: "Baa-llocks."

> [RPA] El Bekko [Ben] wrote:
> Whoever it is, high fives would ensue. <

High fives are the fastest, gayest way to ruin porn.
NSFW: http://tiny.cc/hcXdS

528

(32 replies, posted in Politics)

Introducing a Minimum Wage causes more problems than it solves.

529

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

"...but it is how that is of interest i belive."

Well, first you drink a pint of Dutch Lager...

530

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

Discretion may be the better part of valour, but:

  Almost a week has passed and not one xenophobic dick has attempted to address my funny but true arguments with and argument that seems logical and fair until you translate it into plain english? Shame.

tongue

531

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

> Simon wrote:
> "Excessive alcohol consumption irreversibly damages the temporal lobes"
That seems pretty huge to me. <

You did not know this already? Did anyone else on this forum, other than me, already know that alcohol irreversibly damages your brain?

532

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

New content? Hmm...

Proof that gays support the economy and promote competition: http://images.starcraftmazter.net/4chan/tech_games/gay_test.jpg

Making the point that women got equality even though we all knew they didn't really want it and could never really handle it, so why can't we have what we want, knowing we can handle it?: http://jeewanjoshi.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/funny_motivational_posters_29.jpg?w=400&h=320

Making the point that if you are against homosexual marriage then you are GAY!: http://funstuff.lefora.com/composition/attachment/95e40033980ac7bd9f62c48a487554df/30259/mime-attachment.jpeg

And finally, just because I feel like being a dick: http://pics.blameitonthevoices.com/042009/gay_test.jpg

Now get out of that one tongue

> Rambaldi wrote:
> Would you stop watching, or continue, would you mention it to them or not?
What if you saw a family member on one?
hmm<


I once had a few pictures that were a little risque, the most decent of which I posted somewhere. Turns out it was of a forum member.
I'm past "Whoa!", I'm now at "Cool".

534

(27 replies, posted in General)

> ..Nemeara.. wrote:
> talking aboot schoolnights doesnt make you a schoolgirl >.< <

Shh, we're fantasizing... Well, I am wink

535

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

Taken from an article in The Metro (uk).

"Off Your Face
  Drunks are aggressive and more likely to get into fights because alcohol reduces their ability to judge people's expressions, a study has shown. Alcoholics - even recovering ones - have decreased activation in the part of the brain that reads faces, meaning they often misunderstand others in emotionally charged situation. Excessive alcohol consumption irreversibly damages the temporal lobes and, as a result, alcoholics are left with 'a wide array of behavioural problems, including disinhibition and disregard for social norms', said experts in California."


  I imagine that my first reaction to this article was much the same as most other peoples reaction, one best summed up with the phrase 'Well, duh!'. Then I thought about it for a little while (about twenty minutes) and my opinion did not change, but I did come up with a great question:
 
  This study was done by experts in what field?

  You see, I have difficulty imagining a real scientist daring to waste funding trying to answer a question that anyone who has ever imbibed alcohol, and anyone who has not, could answer. Here, watch:

  Why are drunk people aggressive, stupid, and incapable of differentiating between accidental eye contact and a proposal of marriage? Because they are drunk!

  Now where is MY funding, where are MY column inches, where is MY reward for telling people what they have known for all of the ten thousand years that have passed since beer was invented? Oh yes, of course, I do not get anything because I am not an expert.
  "Experts"... pah!

536

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

Christ, I can't believe this thing is still going!
Aren't you people bored of jumping through Avogadro's hoops yet.

"If you saw someone you knew in a porno.. how would you react?"

  I'd be more than a little freaked out, but I'd be ok with it after a while.

538

(58 replies, posted in General)

> Peach pudding pie wrote:
> *points to Nolios post*
now thats a married man for you .
bet hes getting lucky more time than the rest of you are tongue <


It's not luck if it's sitting right in front of you. tongue

539

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

Last week I loaned a fellow member of the hidden homeless that I live with some money. Ordinarily I do not do such things, but I had come to know this person quite well so had no problem accepting their guarantee that I would be repaid when they recieved their benefit payment a few days later. I also stressed that this was my sencond weeks' shopping money and without it I would have nothing to eat for seven days.
As you can guess this person then vanished into the night, and I was never repaid.
  As hunger pains began to knaw at my expectant stomach (everything affects homeless people faster) I considered my options:

1)  Not eat for seven days.
2)  Beg.
3)  Steal.
4)  Rely on the misnamed "soup kitchen", a christian outreach project providing sandwiches, tea, coffee, cup-a-soup, biscuits and homemade cakes at 8:30pm each tuesday and thursday, leaving five days.
5)  Eat out of domestic dustbins and town-center litterbins.
6)  Visit the back yard of every restaurant, cob shop and supermarket and take what they have thrown out.

  I decided on number 6, knowing that even though I was still technically eating rubbish it was still good as it would have only passed its "best before" date that day.
I visited Pizza Hut, who told me that weekends were the best time to check there as they only really make mistakes with orders during busy periods, the Family Bakers cob shop, the owner of which decided that it would be funny to sneak up on me and slam the lid of the dustbin on the back of my head (revenge was sweet), and finally Sainsburys.

  Sainsburys throws out everything their bakery produces every Sunday night and at some point during the midweek. Mostly your reward for bravely hopping over their back wall is a pile of assorted "baked that day" breads thet have not sold. Sometimes you get some kind of bun, biscuit, cookie or cake, which is usually the result of someone ordering a bag of tooth rotting crap and then not bothering to pick it up. The night I hopped over the wall there was the usual assortment of bready goodness, and four or five pallets piled high with junk food.
Sainsburys has a nasty habit of leaving their deliveries out back for hours.
As you can guess I have done this before now, out of necessity I can assure you, and at no point have I touched the deliveies (It doesn't take a genius to figure out what will happen to me if I try to "live" off of a crate of Walkers Crisps for seven days) however I have had the opportunity to watch organised gangs of addicts steal nothing but pallets of Coca-Cola, or other such valuable brand named crap.

  So as I creep from around the back of the waste compactor I can see that the bread is within easy reach. What I didn't see in my haste is the manager waiting for me.
Busted.
Naturally I cooperate, after all what kind of prick is going to put me in prison for trying to survive? We have a nice chat in the security guards office while we wait for the Police to arrive, where I notice that none of the security screens give an external view of the building (no wonder their deliveries keep getting raped by the 'phet-heads), and I understandably fail to convince the manager that I'm only there for the foodstuffs they have thrown out (Every Sunday night and either Wednesday or Thursday night). The Police arrive, they talk, the manager gives me a letter that is clearly meant for shoplifters, and then I am taken to the police car, inside which the officer tells me that he "Isn't going to arrest some homeless for trying to take a few mouldy loaves of bread". But just to be sure we go back to the Station where he has a quick conversation with his Sarge, and I learn that the only prosecutable crime I have committed is Tresspass, which is part of Civil Law and not Criminal Law.
  I also learn that had I chosen to wander onto the back yard of Sainburys whilst their back gate was open, i.e. during a delivery, I could have taken a whole pallet of junk food and only be charged with something called "Theft by Finding" if I recall correctly, a minor offence with a very small punishment (Apparently the logic is that it is your own damn fault for leaving open access to things that are worth selling).

  On my way "home", still foodless, I walk through the town centre, past a bar cum restaurant as a gargantuan superchunk of a fat man leaves, turning to walk in the same direction that I am headed in. As he passes a litter bin he drops a receipt into it.
I'm an uncontrollably nosey bastard so out of instinct I grab it.
The gargantuan superchunk of a fat bastard has just eaten one Ale and Beef Gourmet Pie, one something-beginning-with-C Steak, and a side salad. SIDE SALAD!
In total that "one" meal cost the same, optimistically, as three weeks of my own food shopping.

I honestly considered mugging that bloated land whale. It is a good thing I didn't, I was so angry at him that I would have kicked him to death.

AvR

540

(66 replies, posted in General)

"Quantum Idol" Reject

want =0_0=

541

(19 replies, posted in Politics)

> Justinian I wrote:

> > &#9773; Fokker wrote:

That sounds distinctly average.>

Compared to what? The Western world?

French women between the ages of 30-49 have had between 5.1 sexual partners. In the US, only 9% of women report having 15 or more partners, and on average they reported 4 partners.

Sorry. France has the US beat, and NZ totally has France beat. I don't think further investigation in Western countries is needed, since France is beat by NZ by about 4x.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/19374216/
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1720316,00.html
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/10/13/1191696214489.html <


It was a joke, but since you asked:

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=749336
"Young women are more promiscuous than men, according to a survey that claims the average 21-year-old has had nine sexual partners compared with seven for men.

The poll of 2,000 by the magazine More also found that one in four young women has slept with more than 10 people, compared with one in five men who had done the same.

In addition, half of those questioned admitted they had been unfaithful, whereas only a quarter said they had been cheated on by a boyfriend."

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/sex/story/0,,818356,00.html
"Loss of Virginity
Under 12 1%
12-13 8%
14-15 23%
16-18 40%
19-20 13%
21-24 10%
25-30 2%
Never had sex 3%

Number of Sexual Partners
None 3%
1 15%
2 11%
3 10%
4 9%
5 9%
6-10 20%
11-15 8%
16-20 6%
20+ 9%"

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3936-fake-liedetector-reveals-womens-sex-lies.html
"Women are more likely than men to lie about their sex lives, reveals a new study. Women's coyness about their sexual behaviour was unveiled by a US study involving a fake lie detector test.

In surveys since the 1960s, men typically report having more sexual partners and than do women - a statistically impossible feat. For example, British men boast an average of 13 partners over a lifetime compared with an average of nine partners for women."

"Women change their answers depending on whether or not they believe they will be caught out not telling the truth, the researchers found. The number of sexual partners a woman reported nearly doubled when women thought they were hooked up to a lie detector machine."


I have not posted the current average age for loss of virginity as I find the figure shameful.

542

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

> avogadro wrote:

> Do not question the Ministry of Truth <

tongue

> [TI] ARFeh zee Frenchie wrote:
> > &#9773; Fokker wrote:

> > Chris_Balsz wrote:
> how many people do you know who got an MRI under your national plan? <
You mean a brain scan? I've had loads.
[edit] So, one person. [/edit] <

Aren't you schizo?
So more than one person. <


That's Multiple Personality Disorder. hmm

544

(145 replies, posted in General)

I like boobs like mickey mouse ears.

> Chris_Balsz wrote:
> how many people do you know who got an MRI under your national plan? <

You mean a brain scan? I've had loads.

[edit] So, one person. [/edit]

546

(220 replies, posted in Politics)

> Chris_Balsz wrote:
> Gay people want
1 moral opposition to a lifestyle to evaporate
2 arbitrary reversal of common defintions, preferrably by nonelected judges rewriting century old law
3 universal moral code applauding their lifestyle
4 acceptance that any criticsm of these demands is the return of jim crow, the third reich and the spanish inquisition <

1) MORAL opposition? How does what I do in the privacy of my own home (and the Admiral Duncan) offend your morals? In fact, how is it immoral? (Not going to argue, just curious as to how my lifestyle choice affects your life?)

2) If you're referring to the definition of marriage then don't worry, I'm not after the word, just the rights it entails. (deja vu?)

3) Where the flip did that come from? You think that that is what all of this is about, that I want to be buggered on a podium whilst thousands of "straight" people give me a standing ovation?

4) You have a very strange head my friend...

547

(58 replies, posted in General)

ED! big_smile

On Topic: Technically

548

(145 replies, posted in General)

> ~E

549

(19 replies, posted in Politics)

> Justinian I wrote:
> New Zealand, land where the average woman has had an average of 20 sexual partners, ftw!
They can invade the US any time smile. We won't even shoot. <

That sounds distinctly average.

550

(54 replies, posted in Politics)

You "allow that shit" because you have to, because to deny it would be denying the American way of doing things, but that does not stop you from trying to pressure other countries into doing what you want, does it? No it does not, and who cares if you make yourself look like hypocritical liars and cowards, as long as nobody notices, as long as nobody thinks...
...oh wait, we did, and now we don't have a "special relationship" any more!


When you intimidate the world don't be surprised if it grows up to bully you back.