1,926

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

its an economy where people dont use money, they trade goods. he thinks somehow it will magically be better. while theres a reason why money exists, its much more efficient to use money. its alot easier to give someone $50 then to give them something worth $50. 

he explains it in an earlier post, unfortunately he feels the need to make long posts with much bullshit inorder to make him delude himself into thinking of himself as intelligent:

"What does capitalism have to do with this?  Capitalism includes the resource-based economy.  The resource economy already exists.  It is running parallel with the monetary based economy.  More emphasis, however, is being placed on it.

Look at it this way: when goods become unaffordable monetarily, when monetary prices become uncompetitive with the resource-based value of those goods, or when tax laws make monetary exchanges more inconvenient than resource-based exchanges, there is a natural tenancy for the merchant and purchaser to then conduct transactions with resources rather than money.  This happens all the time.  It is estimated that the resource-based economy is about 1/3 of the real economy.

Take the following scenario: A mechanic named John has trouble with his home computer.  It's been running slow ever since his last automatic upgrade.  he only bought the computer 2 years ago.   He doesn't figure he should have to go out and buy a brand new one.  He hates Microsoft for what he sees is a marketing ploy: intentionally 'updating' his computer so as to make it run more slowly so he has to go and get a new one with windows vista.

Then, out of the blue, an old friend of John's, Bill the IT guy, phones him and says that his car needs a tune-up and asks John if he could take a look?

What happens next?  Well, I'm sure you can guess.   They make a resource-based exchange: John the mechanic fixes up Bill's car, and Bill the IT guy fixes up John's computer.

No money is exchanged; No taxes are collected.

Want another example of the resource-based economy at work in our day and age?

www.couchsurfing.com  - the site is being SWAMPED by users participating in resource-based exchanges through this website: you have a resource in your home - a couch.  You let people of good reputation and good standing sleep on your couch for a night, and in exchange your own reputation or standing is raised, to the extent, that next time you want to go to, let's say, New York for a holiday, you won't have to pay a dime for accomodation there.  Again, no money exchanged, no taxes.  Only thing exchanged are resources: your couch / spare bedroom this night for somebody-elses couch / spare bedroom in the future.

This sort of resource-based exchange, if it really takes-off as I expect it will, could throw a wrench in the cogs of the wheels of the multimnational hotel industry, and, personally, GOOD: in some cities you can't get a decent room for less than 200 dollars a night nowadays.

We have to understand what the resource-based economy is: it is a protest movement against the unjust inflationary trend upon which the monetary-based economy depends.  As inflation increases, and higher prices continue to make the resource-based economic system more appealing to consumers, the monetary system will simply fade away.

It is simply a matter of time.  The resource-based economy is coming, and fast."

1,927

(16 replies, posted in Politics)

skoe, you say democracy doesnt work, but how is it failing? look where democratic governments are present and look at the most stable countries with the highest standards of living and they are one in the same. clearly democratic governments work.

1,928

(47 replies, posted in General)

> The Yell wrote:

> SNES never fell down! 

It was BETRAYED by ingrates!!!


lmao! so true! i play on SNES and NES emulators all the time. those games way better then any xbox or ps2 shit. the masses just get distracted by pretty graphics.

1,929

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

v.kemp, dont even bother with him. he's not capable of responding to a simple point that i repeated half a dozen times for him. instead he takes words out of context and pretends to make viable points. he's incapable of intelligent debate, and me in my optimistic attitude has granted him far more respect then he has ever deserved.

1,930

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

yep, because theres no service that people want other then their most basic needs met. moron

1,931

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

i was nice and responded to all your points, please do the same.

"im saying that what good does eliminating labor do? whats better then a honest day's work, how is giving farmers nothing to do, like you said in a previous post, an improvement for the world?"

1,932

(47 replies, posted in General)

the one thing that made it so i would never consider palying another round of IC was official NAPs. it wasnt one of the things i left because of, because i left way before NAPs were official, but it made it so i will never consider playing the game again.

1,933

(47 replies, posted in General)

Lizzy was a bitch

1,934

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

"Are you suggesting that the only reason people do an honest days' work is because they are driven by fear of being without basic needs?  Are you saying that the only way for our economy to function is for people to be driven by fear of starvation and losing their home?"

no, im saying that what good does eliminating labor do? whats better then a honest day's work, how is giving farmers nothing to do, like you said in a previous post, an improvement for the world?

"What has happened to all the farmers?  Well, they are still there, in the farm houses.  Nothing has changed except the need to expend their labor to harvesting the product. "




"I've already proven people would still do an honest day's work even if their basic needs were met (i.e. billionaires).  Or are you also suggesting that billionaires are a drag on the system? "

lol. billionaires work because of greed for more money. without the monetary system, them and people like them would have no drive, and wouldnt work.



"
What kind of idiotic notion is that?"

it is an idiotic notion that you completely fabricated.

1,935

(47 replies, posted in General)

its been too long. i havent played in like 5 years, maybe more, i dont remember specifics like what things wer called and what changes were done to what things.

1,936

(47 replies, posted in General)

too many rules punishing active players to give smaller, inactive players/families a better chance. and over moderation on the forums smile

1,937

(24 replies, posted in Politics)

[wow that was narrow minded]

1,938

(23 replies, posted in Politics)

im not really a metal fan. but i enjoy jimi hendrex, i like purple haze, i know what the lyrics are talking about and me enjoying to listen to Purple Haze doesnt mean im supporting drug use. same thing is true with christians and metal with Satan. the idea that you have to support the idea the lyrics present of the songs you like, especially when its metal, is a joke. i like the song "baby's got back" but i dont find big butts particularly attractive...

1,939

(23 replies, posted in Politics)

you can love metal, you can love the lyrics, and you can be a good christian. there is no commandment "though shall listen to no metal".

1,940

(62 replies, posted in General)

zombies are already dead, you cant wait for them to die....

1,941

(95 replies, posted in Politics)

yeah, 5ms isnt so evil, just saying someone very serious about fps would be more concerned with the slower response time then they would about a slightly wider view.

well, both political parties in the US are socialist, so its no surprise that neither of them tried to change it.

i cant see how you can say competition to the free market is gone when a free market doesnt even exist...

1,942

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

"Personally, I very much doubt most people would spend their lives playing mmorpgs and reading conspiracy theories.  Looking around, on this forum, I guess that it wouldn't be a sample representative of the general population."

what would you expect most people to do that would be so much better then an honest day's work?

1,943

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

the most important point being 4. why do you think reducing human labor would make the world any better? why do you think people reading conspiracy theories and mmorpg's online all day is better then an honest day's work?

1,944

(3 replies, posted in General)

has anyone bought it? what are your first impressions.

i havent bought it yet, but last night i played with 3 friends on a LAN with a pirated copy and went through two lvls on hard difficulty. after playing the demo, i was quite impressed with how fun it turned out being. although, there are quite abit of glitches which im not sure if they've fixed yet with patches.

1,945

(714 replies, posted in Politics)

/facepalm. way to ignore all of my points and then quote one and then talk about something completely different then the point you quoted.

they are all directedat your rice farming. 1, by freeing up farmers we arent saving them from horrible jobs, we're taking away the best job available to them. 2, we dont have the technology and developing the technology isnt realistic. 3, when we have the technology where robotic farming is better, capitalism would encourage that system to thrive.

the most important point being 4. why do you think reducing human labor would make the world any better? why do you think people reading conspiracy theories and mmorpg's online all day is better then an honest day's work?

1,946

(49 replies, posted in General)

i havent gone older then 26 so far, and i dont plan to any time soon.

whats wrong with dating an older women? well they're past their physical peek, so why would you be wasting the years of your life when you're at your physical peek when you have the most opportunities to have relationships with girls at their physical peek?

1,947

(95 replies, posted in Politics)

> sad sKoE )= wrote:

> Its not the socialist attitude at all.
Its some people who claim to be socialist present symptoms remarkably similar to that attitude.

> drives the politicians


its american socialists, not what you would view as socialist. but you're not the boss of what is and isnt socialist.

1,948

(95 replies, posted in Politics)

its the socialist attitude, that everyone deserves such and such that drives the politicians to force banks to give credit to people that shouldnt have it and is causing the economic crisis.

1,949

(95 replies, posted in Politics)

yell, the problem is the larger monitors also have slower response times. thats why for serious fpsing, you cant go above 24" atm. or at least none of the 30" i've seen have had anything better then 5ms response time.  while theres 24" monitors with 2ms response times.

as for a 30" being too big.... i use a recliner so i'm usually a fair distance away from the actual monitor while playing. i currently have 24" and would like to go larger, 30" being the obvious choice because any smaller would use the same resolution i have and just decrease picture quality.  i think i've talked myself out of it atm. it appears OLED's are going to be able to compete with LCD's  and not just be ridiculously expensive toys in a year or two. they have higher pixel density, slimmer, lighter, more durable, faster response time, perfect blacks, use less energy, and will possibly be transparent when not in use.

schniepel, is the 30" at work widescreen? i think i've seen them widescreen and not, widescreen is obviously better at maximizing what you see in your field of view.  maybe when OLED monitor's come out, they'll be able to have much higher resolutions at smaller sizes.

and yes, its just not the banks, its the socialist idea in washington thats forcing this shit.

1,950

(95 replies, posted in Politics)

> Schniepel wrote:

> Also i would like to mention that all this american "wealth" is kind of a hoax.. we are basically suffering from the result now.
Many people seem to have a house and that 26" LCD.. you 400$ chair.. even if they did not have the money to pay it. Lets have everyone build a house even if they will never be able to pay it hoooray.... long live the american dream.


well, its more the idiots in washington forcing the banks to give people the money to buy houses that have no place buying houses which created an artificial climb of house prices. i wouldnt really blame it on the large lcd's or comfortable furniture we have.