1,151

(41 replies, posted in General)

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/tieknots.shtml

I prefer the Oriental, as I am very fat and wear ties I buy at 99 Cents Only (seriously, you guys) which come from China and are generally on the shorter side.  The Oriental gives a good symetrical knot without using a lot of length, and if you practice making a "u" as you cinch, it even gets a dimple.


The Windsor tie is considered very formal, and so it would actually be out of place with less formal wear such as with chinos or a seersucker.  Also it is fat enough it might not work with some collar styles.  Finally, whatever knot you use, the ends of the tie should be of equal length and they should just brush the top of your pants, so, be aware the Windsor uses a lot of length.

""They contributed to the debt and actively supported the dumbing down and feminization of our entire nation, resulting in less and less educated and virtuous men and women with the will and capacity to defend our nation."

I'm sure drug legalization will solve that.

And you can bitch and moan and hem and haw all you want about the two parties...but...they remain the 2 major parties because your own party is too gonzo to renounce drug legalization.

1,153

(31 replies, posted in Politics)

>>>If the government punished pre-marital sex and further privileged marriage and Christianity, that would be a tipping point where I would support armed rebellion. And I'm sure a lot of young men would too. If you want public peace, then keep sex cheap by keeping it possible to minimize its risks.<<<


Google "palimony".


BTW I'm sure the Libertarians stand with me that if you fondle a daughter or sister without regard to marriage, then our Founders intended that you be separated from your nads, so that your sex life be free from further risks.  You'll find dining alone to be a lot cheaper too.

When you legalize opium nobody will notice the collapse.

1,155

(31 replies, posted in Politics)

http://legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Rebranding-590-LI.jpg

So now they may not have $ for the Easter Egg Roll

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSBm28uHhkXWan2Bsek6mIFIU9H46B6GyoM_OeYopygD__zrFh5

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAaa

Healthy people getting tested, and making appointments to talk about health, will expand our CURRENT healthcare system, because it is not set up for that.  It will cost more to insist everybody engage in preventative care, than we are currently paying, and enough more that it will be a problem.

Right because if you eat whole grains and skip the red meat you will never ever ever have a heart attack or a stroke.  Your death will come from transcendental meditation, your body will evaporate like the kid in Powder leaving only smiles and a lingering scent of pine.

"Checkups sure. Tests, as necessary--Always less often than the unhealthy, who more often have problems, more often suffer symptoms of disease, and more often require tests."

Wrong.  The unhealthy don't do them at all.   Once a year is more frequent than never.

You are like a woman who buys 3 pairs of shoes on sale, insisting that compared with the nonsale cost of the shoes, she has SAVED money.  When in fact she spent $0 on shoes all month and then went and maxxd out the card.

The cost of covering preventative care for everybody is a steep immediate surge in the use of medical care that must be paid immediately in real dollars.

1,160

(19 replies, posted in Feedback)

Render should get tagpoints because he does not speak English as a first language but he knows what "titillating" means

They will go in for checkups and tests and consultations and wellness classes and exams.  Instead of people not doing those things you will have thousands more people trying to do those things in every city. That costs money. 

And it does no good at all to argue "Well if they do those things then down the road they won't have cancer etc and we won't have to pay as much".  In order for them to be healthier you have to fnd MORE  money NOW to enable them to have the checkups and tests and consults and classes and exams.  It's no good to say "well they can find it all online or read Prevention and Women's Health".  They could do  that NOW and they don't. 

What used to be paid isn't good enough anymore.  You need more money because healthy people will use the system more for decades to come.

Well I'm 38, I haven't had a full blood panel EVER cause it's like $2000, same with a colonic, I don't bother going to have my throat checked when I have a week of fever since I paid $78 to be told I was sick, I get my eyes checked every 3 years, I don't have a regular doctor or an annual physical.  I don't belong to a gym anymore, I don't have a massage therapist or a chiropractor anymore.  I haven't consulted as to a healthy diet or consulted a physician before beginning a regimen of exercise.

Healthy people use the system MORE. A lot MORE than Not At All.

But I need massage, regular exercise, I need to monitor my cholesterol, check my iron content, I need the flu vaccine every time they mention it, I need to have that bump looked at, I need my teeth cleaned and bonded and straightened and my eyes fixed up with laser surgery.  And we should all have a colonic every year.   That bout of diarrhea could be e coli.  That can't be overlooked.

The costs at Krogers are "socialized" then. 


Everybody hitches the price to demand in order to meet costs.

Mature, responsible, healthy people would be an enormous drain on the system because they use it more.  That's why they're responsible.  That's why they're healthy. 

Obama has said it straight out only people don't want to condemn their Messiah:  your options will be limited and you won't get all the care you thought you could.  You'll die broken.  Your doctors will guess more.   You won't get the painkiller.  It's a good thing!

1,165

(15 replies, posted in Politics)

I'm not sure where you're at in relation to this topic.

Fox has gone limp.  Fox Business News retains the spirit, but Fox News is just pap.  They got spanked when the Egyptian revolt revealed they had no assets overseas to talk about the world, and now they decided to stop snarking on Obama so hard.

1,166

(8 replies, posted in Politics)

Be smart and diplomatic.

When Erdogan touches down serve him papers showing HE has custody of the kid.

Crisis defused.

Your country has one less Turk to bother with.

And it'll be a cold day in Hell before they come to Rotterdam arguing about crap they can be forced to own.

1,167

(19 replies, posted in Feedback)

A titillating temptation... I mean it's fair! Very fair!

How is that socializing the cost of care? Soaking rich customers is pure capitalism

Every business owner has to sharpen a pencil and figure how many sales he has to make at a given price to know if it will make the business pay, that's all I'm saying

1,169

(11 replies, posted in History)

I remember when Wolf's Dragoons had only Inner Sphere tech

1,170

(38 replies, posted in Feedback)

You could create unlockable bonuses for performance ingame that encourage "crosstraining".

Conquer planets and get a reduction in decay of resources per turn.
Pull off special ops missions and your building maintenance costs go down.
Transfer enough resources and get a combat forces bonus.
These would be forfeit through inactivity- failing to log on regularly - or mods could remove them for bad behavior.

That way all things being equal a player who comes on every day and opens himself to the full experience of gameplay will eventually become a "better" player than a guy who logs in every few days to do one role.

The bonuses would expire with the round so you can't rest on your laurels.

1,171

(15 replies, posted in Politics)

You should agree with me, or you missed the bus

1,172

(23 replies, posted in General)

Apparently he was also thrown by the steel roof.   He kept referring to the "romantic theater".

He asked who was from Ontario and 1 person waved.
He asked where everybody else was and they yelled "NOT ONTARIO"

so it may not make TV

1,173

(6 replies, posted in General)

I will analyze this game for a fee

1,174

(31 replies, posted in Politics)

Pat Caddell, the Fox News Contributor and Democrat pollster who engineered Jimmy Carter’s 1976 Presidential victory, blew the lid off CPAC on Thursday with a blistering attack on "racketeering" Republican consultants who play wealthy donors like "marks."

"I blame the donors who allow themselves to be played for marks. I blame the people in the grassroots for allowing themselves to be played for suckers....It's time to stop being marks. It's time to stop being suckers. It’s time for you people to get real," he told the audience that included two top Republican consultants.

Caddell stole the show as a panelist in the breakout session titled "Should We Shoot All the Consultants Now?" He spoke with a fire and passion that electrified the room. When the session began the large room was half filled, but as word spread of the fireworks going on inside, the audience streamed in. By the end, it was standing room only.

Breitbart News spoke with Caddell prior to his talk, and he promised he would deliver a "brutal critique" of the Republican establishment and its political consulting class. He did not disappoint, pulling no punches with an unyielding evisceration of a small group of Republican consultants, the Romney campaign, the Republican National Committee, and Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS Super PAC.

"When you have the Chief of Staff of the Republican National Committee and the political director of the Romney campaign, and their two companies get $150 million at the end of the campaign for the 'fantastic' get-out-the-vote program...some of this borders on RICO [the 1970 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act] violations," Caddell told the crowd. "It's all self dealing going on. I think it works on the RICO thing. They’re in the business of lining their pockets."

"The Republican Party," Caddell continued, "is in the grips of what I call the CLEC--the consultant, lobbyist, and establishment complex." Caddell described CLEC as a self serving interconnected network of individuals and organizations interested in preserving their own power far more than they're interested in winning elections.

"Just follow the money," Caddell told a rapt audience. "It’s all there in the newspaper. The way it works is this--ever since we centralized politics in Washington, the House campaign committee and the Senate campaign committee,  they decide who they think should run. You hire these people on the accredited list [they say to candidates] otherwise we won't give you money. You hire my friend or else."

Financial corruption is a key component of the current process, according to Caddell. "There's money passing under the table on both parties. Don’t kid yourself...If you can’t see racketeering in front of you, God save you."

As a Democrat, Caddell said he could tell the truth about the failings of the Republicans 2012 campaign efforts since "I have no interest in the Republican Party." He compared Republicans unfavorably to Democrats."In my party we play to win. We play for life and death. You people play for a different kind of agenda...Your party has no problem playing the Washington Generals to the Harlem Globetrotters."

Caddell left no doubt he is not an admirer of Mitt Romney's campaign management skills. He called Romney "the worst executive I've seen" when it comes to leading a political campaign.  Romney's failure to attack Obama's Benghazi debacle during the foreign policy debate was "cravenness" that came about because his consultants told him "we don’t want to look warlike."

Caddell also said Romney failed to back his campaign with his own money when it was most needed. "My question for Romney is, you spent $45 million [of your own money] in your 2008 campaign where you didn't have a chance. Why didn't you give your campaign a loan in the spring instead of letting Obama define you?"

Romney, Caddell said, was not on top of his game when he failed to anticipate attacks based on his business career. "You didn't know Bain was coming? Ted Kennedy used it against you." Romney lost to Ted Kennedy in the 1994 Senate election in Massachusetts.

Caddell was equally caustic in his evaluation of the Republican consultants who managed Romney's campaign. "Of course this election could have been won.  It should have been won," he said. "The Romney campaign was the worst campaign in my lifetime except for ninety minutes [in the first debate] thanks to Barack Obama."

"There was a failure of strategy, a failure of tactics, a massive failure of messaging. Most of all there was a total failure of imagination." Caddell singled out Stuart Stevens, a key figure in Romney's campaign, in a particularly withering critique. "Stevens had as much business running a campaign as I do sprouting wings and flying out of this room," he said to an audience that applauded.

Caddell said that Romney inexplicably allowed Obama to define him without fighting back. If Obama had a 50% favorable rating on election day, he had an 80% chance of winning. If he had a 45% favorable rating on election day, he had a 90% chance of losing. On election day, Obama's favorable rating was 51% because, Caddell said, "Republicans failed to hold him down."

"A majority of the people wanted to repeal Obamacare, [an issue that] the Republican Party abandoned," Caddell noted. He added that "on the issue of bigger or smaller government, one-third of the people who want smaller government voted for Obama."

Caddell criticized the RNC's planned announcement on Monday of the RNC's Growth and Opportunity Project report, which he dismissed as "this whitewash...being produced at the RNC. You can not have the people who failed responsible for finding the solution."

Caddell predicted that the Republican Party, unless it became the anti-establishment, anti-Washington party, would become extinct, like the 19th century Whig Party. "These people [in the consulting-lobbying-establishment complex] are doing business for themselves. They are a part of the Washington establishment. These people don’t want to have change."
The 2010 takeover of Congress by the Republicans, Caddell said, "was not engineered by the Washington Republican establishment. They [the establishment] then took that victory and threw it away."

Caddell called Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) "the Ambrose Burnside of American politics." Burnside was the commander of the Union's Army of the Potomac during the Civil War. He was dismissed by Lincoln for his inability to press his advantage against the enemy, his plodding and unimaginative strategies, and his inability to focus resources on the tactics needed for victory.

Caddell cautioned Republicans not to read too much in the 2012 results where they maintained control of the House of Representatives. "You won the House [in 2012] because of the reapportionment that came after the 2010 [Tea Party] victories," he said. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), elected in 2010, and Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI), elected in 2012, had to fight this establishment at every step in the process and "claw their way" to electoral success, Caddell said.

When an audience member asked Caddell why he, a Democrat, was offering Republicans advice that would help them beat his own party, his response was met with huge applause. "I'm not a fan of Barack Obama," Caddell said. "My first allegiance is to my country. I have paid a huge price, and when I watch you people screwing up I'm offended."

Nancy Smith, a grassroots activist who co-founded an independent Virginia  group that focused on door-to-door canvassing and get-out-the-vote in the 2012 election, was effusive in her praise of Caddell's critique. "This talk by Caddell is what this entire conference should be about."

The panel was moderated by Matt Schlapp, a principal at Cove Strategies, a Republican political consulting firm. In addition to Caddell, the panel included Jeff Roe, the founder of Axiom Strategies, also a Republican political consulting firm, Morton Blackwell, a Republican National Committeeman from Virginia and founder of the Leadership Institute, and Brian Baker, founder of a Super PAC.

1,175

(15 replies, posted in Politics)

NOT AGAIN.  I QUOTED YOU. 

You said whether I had an opinion to the left or right on all those issues it didn't matter because I wasn't on board with you about the Federal Reserve.  You really think NONE of those things you mentioned matter?  If we had the Left's vision of the welfare state and got rid of the Federal Reserve, we'd have a better America?