7,151

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

gee, maybe we have to kill the enemy?

7,152

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

And therefore you will lose the war when you kill 300 guerrillas and take 5 fatal casualties every day for 8 years.

shoot the damn paratrooper.  either you're repelling an airborne assault, or, you're helping the US get air supremacy by running down the cadre of experienced airmen available to the enemy.  By 1945 the average Jap pilot had about 100 hrs in teh air compared to 2000 for his American opposition, and that only hurt the Navy hwen they gave up dogfighting for controlled suicide crashees. 

anyhow you're toting a halfass rifle that's designed to maim not to kill. Also you probably wont hit the sonuvabitch because you train to make noise and scare people into holding still for the arty to slay them, not to be  Sgt York the sniper.

  And if the enemy can't stand it, he'll either give his unarmed airmen flourescent chutes, or train the [faggotry] out of them about how not to land on American trenches.

7,153

(4 replies, posted in General)

Federal Emergency Management Agency

7,154

(106 replies, posted in Politics)

As I watch Greece go up in flames and Europe debate how it can borrow enough to sustain itself, I'm struck by the idea that a centralized, coordinated Europe is barely 20 years old.  It's not very strong and this could be our chance to kill it.

A centralized Europe will demand its own voice, while, at the same time, demand support and sustenance.  It can get fuel and arms from Russia a lot cheaper than America, at this point, could afford to offer.  At the same time, since it just won't take on Russia, as being rightly considered too mean to avoid a fight, it can gain its own voice by telling America to go to hell; coincidentally this is just what Russia would like to hear.

For those reasons then, a united Europe would be a pushy client and at best a geopolitical neutral.

A divided Europe, though, would have to settle for what it could get, and align itself with the most friendly great power.   Though it may seem odd, a divided Europe would probably be more likely to align behind NATO against Russia than the EU.

For these reasons its probably in America's interests to help spread chaos throughout the EU.

7,155

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

when did I say it was based on population?

7,156

(4 replies, posted in General)

um...did FEMA leave with Bush?

7,157

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

you're presuming that all prisoners are entitled to survive the war, and that's not the case, because there have ALWAYS been a presumption that extreme assholes deserve to eat lead as criminals

in the case of WW2, an Allied combatant had a hundred thousand-man outfit for summary execution of unlawful combatants (MKVD) after battlefield court martial

and an 80,000 strong corps of the opponent was probably, to a man, guilty of war crimes (SS) because the corps was organized for that purpose

to say nothing of the Japanese Imperial Army which was a terror force to strongarm lesser races into obedience.

if American ran into another SS or a MKVD we could do what Patton did, let em get lined up and shot and so what

i dont understand what  you mean about "not impacting US policy", we have to actualyl break the enemy to take so many prisoners.  I don't think we're gonna anymore.

7,158

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

for one thing our side is a bunch of pussies and would give them a trial in NYC anyhow

for antoher, we're not likely to do so well in future wars that we have so many prisoners

7,159

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

United Nations may have recognized China by then, if not, not

and Iran army would be; Republican Guard might not, because they're not "regulars"

we recongize the Islamic Republic, we just don't have formal relations

although last two PResidents have been wimpy

7,160

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

slaps the bongos on Poetry Night

7,161

(46 replies, posted in Politics)

uniformed regular of a recognized national state, and that's it

7,162

(43 replies, posted in General)

you're a student, if you need furniture you can just scavenge the curb

those of us who keep stuff from home to home gotta haul it

also my state has limited amount of paved roads -- a lot, but not 100%

but yeah trucks have got crazy

first they put in all those emission standards and that jacked the price 30%

so everybody borrowed the cost of atruck

so then they figured, if youre gonna finance anyway, why not make AC standard, acoustic engineer the interior, put in CD and stereo, premium upholstery, doodads and gizmos....tehy cost 2x what they need to

7,163

(7 replies, posted in Politics)

i win

j/k tongue  proceed

7,164

(43 replies, posted in General)

in breaking news, SOMEBODY'S truck exploded and burned in Chicago  >.>

wonder WHOSE <.<

7,165

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

[]

7,166

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

has misteltoe in his belt

7,167

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

from the lack of brit posting I get the idea you just wish it would go away

7,168

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

[]

7,169

(106 replies, posted in Politics)

maybe one of the absolute rules should be, "all states bordering the Adriatic are deemed "Transmarine Africa" and are ineligible for EU membership"

/gives EU some fire extinguishers

7,170

(1 replies, posted in General)

saw one of the worst today on www.yahoo.com

"How a Name Gets on the Vietnam Memorial"  (story about stonemason etching a name)

any others?

7,171

(6 replies, posted in General)

I agree with some o fthe commenters that it's probably fake. and not really a bad way to go, compared to bleeding to death from any other sort of explosion.

7,172

(106 replies, posted in Politics)

You can't make a treaty with New York state though.

7,173

(11 replies, posted in Politics)

go ahead and do a Euro history quiz

7,174

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

Oh and dredd, what did Gordon brown call you ?

7,175

(39 replies, posted in Politics)

Tories should do an ad where david tennant materializes onstage of a 3way debate and addresses cameron as "mr prime minister"