Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Yell
But when someone randomly bugs you in public, starts asking you questions and not even telling you his own name or his intentions, would you trust that?
I wouldn't.<<
If he'd grinned and broke the guy's jaw with a right cross, nobody would really object. But he yelled and groped them, which is just sad. And illegal.
upscale hardware and camping stores sell cans of compressed air with little horns as "boat signals" you know for safety. $7.99. Those are about the size of two cans of soda and they make a vuvuzela seem like wind chimes on a spring day. Of course, if it annoyed you, I'm SURE we'd leave them home.
> Freelancer wrote:
> "Like to feed, house, clothe, educate, and employ them? Wouldn't running 100% of everyone's lives require (effectively, if not literally) 100% taxation to pay for it? How do you think that would work out? You're saying that governments are obligated to become tyrannies in order to "support" their citizens "to the fullest." Do you have so compassionate a response to the fact that the level of taxation required for this puts many people in poverty and in need of such government assistance? You're describing a circle of government creating need then fulfilling it until a complete totalitarian tyranny is in place. I think there's room for discussion of "social shelters" short of your radical academic justification (or advocacy, as seems more fitting a description here) for tyranny seen here, which seems to me to be rather limited. Perhaps you could expand on your academic urging of tyranny here that you merely hinted at?"
You are so far from reality that I do not know where to begin.. Also I do not know if you really would try to understand...<<
How so? What's unreal about it? The idea that govt owes 100% support to everybody or the idea that people will abuse that commitment? In Britain people on council housiing refuse to take a pay cut to work.
if you think that's ridiculous, you haven't really read up on American "social justice"
Flint has a right to shelter!
And food!
And clothes!
His own room!
With shower/bath!
And cooking range!
Pressed slacks!
Black/Brown/Blue/Gray combos of sportscoat/slacks!
With shoes of various leathers and formality!
Vicuna sweater vests!
Styled hair!
Cologne!
Cable!
A truck to drive and gas to put in it!
Steady customers!
In Belgium!
I tend to think we have a right to a vibrant economy that doesn't require social shelters when jobs run out...
this is what Whitney Houston sounds like live
soooo...you all hate inane loud noise, and want to prosecute people for wearing clothes from beer companies??
o.O
yeah I dont think you should ever hold a World Cup in teh USA
then put these guys on the ballot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N.W.A
and split their vote
in Soviet Russia, underwear skips YOU!!
LOL schneipel
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/assets_c/2010/06/100616beelertoon_c.php
wrote an unauthorized biography of Vladimir Putin titled
POOTIE TANG
how come no women posting in this thread?
knows the doom of all who mock my balsz
was born on a yak-hair blanket 2 days west of Samarkhand in 1936
"unlawful commercial activities" = wearing orange clothes?
I have underwear, pants and a shirt and tie on 
um the closest a republican came to this was Senator Larry Craig getting called for playing footsie in a men's room, bumping feet with people next to him
including an undercover cop
for which some dumbass libertarians supported him, because its a free country and we just need to be mature about being groped on the the throne X(
should correct her syntax
sounds good to me, I'd rather burn their childhood than pay higher taxes
apparently their fans are paid chinese actors
I think they do, at first. That is why they agree to pay out. They liked what they heard.
explain why "fraud" is not based on religious values
Imperial Forum → Posts by The Yell
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.