6,351

(523 replies, posted in General)

yes in Baseball a line umpire can make a call but they'll refer to other umpires to confirm it.

6,352

(523 replies, posted in General)

"Tall"? /waggles eyebrows

6,353

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

abused the Snoopy Sno Cone Maker and will bring the Horde on us

6,354

(523 replies, posted in General)

"mannschaft" is masked profanity

6,355

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

should have told me when I wanted a snoopy sno cone as a kid

6,356

(523 replies, posted in General)

can ntherlands take the slovaks?

6,357

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

is a sno cone from a snoopy dispenser

6,358

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

licks ice cream

6,359

(523 replies, posted in General)

Oddly enough, an American fan saw our fail coming and said so and tells he said so.  What are the odds of that?

"Last night, in previewing the U.S./Ghana match, I suggested that the U.S. could overcome its shaky back four and defeat Ghana if goal-keeper Tim Howard came up big and "coach Bradley get[s] his central midfield pairing right before halftime, for a change." Unfortunately, Howard did not come up particularly big and, more importantly, it again took Bradley until half time to get his midfield right. Consequently, Ghana defeated the U.S. in overtime.

Since our match against Slovenia, I've been touting midfielder Benny Feilhaber and advocating a line-up in which he, Maurice Edu and Michael Bradley play centrally, with Landon Donovan and Clint Dempsey out wide. The grounds for employing this approach were simple -- the U.S. has played by far its best soccer using it. Surely, Bob Bradley would recognize this in time for our match with Ghana, a team capable of controlling midfield and converting that control into goals.

In fact, however, Bradley not only failed to start Feilhaber in a three man central midfield, he benched Edu in favor of Ricardo Clark. Clark had played so poorly against England that I was sure we wouldn't see him again. In fact, I did not include Clark on the "cheat sheet" I prepare before a match listing the players likely to appear and their numbers.

Yet there was Clark, giving away the ball on a play that led to a Ghana goal in the first five minutes (Howard could have saved the day, but failed to stop a shot he normally would reach). Shortly thereafter, Clark, who plainly was chasing the game, was yellow-carded. By the half hour mark, Bradley had seen enough and replaced Clark with Edu.

Down 1-0 at the half, Bradley brought on Feilhaber. The team now consisted of exactly the line-up I have been touting. Suddenly, the Ghana midfield didn't have time and the ball, and looked quite ordinary. We went on to tie the score and dominate the second half. Unfortunately, we seemed to tire in the overtime (using two of our three allowed subs before the start of half didn't help), and Ghana seized back control for a deserved victory.

We can't be sure that the outcome would have been different had Bradley gotten his formation and personnel right from the start. But we do know that, during the period when my preferred midfielders were playing, we outscored Ghana 1-0 and nearly played them off the pitch. We also know that the pattern was similar in the previous two matches.

I've always thought highly of Bob Bradley and he deserves credit for many of the good things the U.S. did during a mildly successful World Cup run. But I cannot fathom how Bradley could have though he could protect an obviously suspect back four with a two man central midfield anchored by Ricardo Clark."

6,360

(11 replies, posted in Politics)

on the contrary, if Cardinal Mercier were alive today I'm sure he'd be shouting LEMME OUT LEMME OUT LEMME OUT LEMME OUT LEMME  OUT LEMME OUT LEMME OUT cause...yeah

6,361

(523 replies, posted in General)

then get rid of refs and decide it with telephone polling like American Idol

Jeezus.

6,362

(51 replies, posted in Politics)

>>I like the additional level of security - I cannot understand the fear and paranoia from the press in the States. I saw articles showing Obama as both a communist and a nazi all because he was trying to help the millions of Americans currently with no health cover.<<

1. It wont cover everything.  Bureaucrats will draw up limits based on cost vs factors like the probable quality of age factors.  Obama himself cited his bedridden old grandma getting a new hip as an example of waste!  can you say "DEATH PANELS"

2.  You must buy the insurance like it or not, which is unprecedented.  It is too frickin bad that the President feels insulted to be compared to dictators-- fine then Il Douche let me decline to participate in your Utopia.

3.  Not having health coverage does not mean lack of access to health care, as has been explained to you.  The "problem" Obama is "solving" is that he wants for-profit insurers to fail first before the government installs single-payer and curtails service. 

Obama is forcing us into a darker future where everybody will throw more and more of their wages to insurance, and chronically ill people will be denied coverage.   There is NOTHING good about it.

6,363

(51 replies, posted in Politics)

i said I consider that evil...and if the Republicans are so corrupt they'd keep the mandate, I'll change my withholding to $0 and refuse to pay.

6,364

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

dontt talk to LAPD

6,365

(523 replies, posted in General)

> Spiritual wrote:

I'm English, my girl friends German hmm could be the 3rd world war in my house tomorrow lol<<

sounds like the basis for a fun bet!

6,366

(523 replies, posted in General)

I'm for Ghana all the way

if they beat everybdoy else then we don't look so bad big_smile

/me puts on kufi and dashiki and dances barefoot

well I guess we got the basis for a decent showing in 2014

6,367

(523 replies, posted in General)

oh no wonder Schneipel was talking smack big_smile

6,368

(523 replies, posted in General)

wow so everybody who loses from now on is eliminated?

6,369

(523 replies, posted in General)

probably have the jitters never having got this far

6,370

(51 replies, posted in Politics)

http://media.hotair.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/o-sarkozy.jpg

"Heil Oba-"

"No! Not in public! Not yet"

6,371

(19 replies, posted in General)

I want the discus model tho, so when they laugh I can tag them from 30m out

ALL those who want govts to print money and spend spend spend are elitist ogliarchs.  They don't care that 10% of the workers are now dependent on government handouts instead of wages.  What matters is the millionaires who went do the right schools and know the right people are not forced to start over. Without the millionaires we would be forced to start with banks run by the middle class, who clearly are not worthy.  Only a dangerous fanatic really believes that the top 1% are repleaceable.  Fortunately the top 1% control the Mint and can invent all the money they need.  They can even collude across national lines so no mere national election can ever again threaten their power.  From now on, the State and the Money will serve the Elite.  If the masses can afford to eat and marry and educate themselves, gravy. 


If not, too bad.


WHen we choose latin American political economy we must develop Latin American economies and soon Latin American politics.

6,373

(19 replies, posted in General)

I can take my blackberry 8730 into the courthouse though, and your phones would be confiscated cause of the camera tongue

LOL looks like stone tablet is the best buy

6,374

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

does donuts around Piccadilly in a MiniCooper

6,375

(9,083 replies, posted in General)

should know a man's gotta do w hat a man's gotta do