26

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

You say that Scientists expected temparatures to go up in a straight line and as evidence you present an opinion peice by Larry Bell (an Architect)?

Please try harder.

27

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

What is this "'median' established by AGW advocates" ?

Do you have a link to this "data"

Im guessing you made this up- or dont really understand it.

28

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

Some additional facts:

Co2 IS a greenhouse gas - the physics behind it are well understood - if there is more CO2 in the atmosphere,  average temparatures will tend to increase over time. surely you are not disputing this?

Nobody expects temparatures to go up in a straight line each year.

29

(30 replies, posted in Politics)

Your opinion seems to be in stark contrast with reality.

Science advances and always has done by having its hypotheses challenged and refined in the light of new evidence. Where scientific hypotheses are proved wrong they are thrown out.

If you have new evidence which proves, notwithstanding all known physics, that increased CO2 in the atmosphere will not have a greenhouse effect, I suggest you make it known- there could be a nobel prize in it for you.

Its religion not science that sticks to old dogma and ignores any evidence that conflicts with its belief system.

30

(103 replies, posted in Politics)

Of course we should should respect biblical morality.

Where next do you think chick-fil-a should put their campaign funds?

-  the stoning of adulterers and rebellious children

-or  the reintroduction of slavery maybe.

31

(56 replies, posted in Politics)

[no insults pls]

32

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

Its almost certain that there is life out there somewhere in the universe.

Its the idea that intelligent life has travelled several light years for the purpose of drawing crop circles in Texas that I'm having diffculty with.

33

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

Crop circles created by aliens, Cold Fusion and David Icke.

I'm thinking It has to be a parody, they surely cant be serious.

34

(26 replies, posted in Politics)

Any link to this "story" or did you make it up?

Are you serious or just impersonating a typical inadequate right wing sociopath?

36

(5 replies, posted in Politics)

No

37

(10 replies, posted in Ideas)

They should change morale  formaula to be (normal morale loss X attacking fam Pcount/defending fam P-count.) Been saying this for years, it would make farming smaller fams much more difficult.

38

(51 replies, posted in Universal News)

update

-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
101 planet(s) captured by Aname (81 %) (61 retakes).
9 planet(s) captured by Random (43 %) (9 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by gilmour99 (12 %) (2 retakes).
-------------------
72 from #5800
40 from #5804
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 112 times. 2 families and 97 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 22 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 75.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------

2 planet(s) from Aname have been blown up.

List of destroyed planets:
66,114:7 - 80,118:1

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
104 planet(s) lost by Aname
51 planet(s) lost by Flames
47 planet(s) lost by gilmour99
45 planet(s) lost by Random
8 planet(s) lost by someone
-------------------
168 to #5804
87 to #5800
-------------------
We have been beaten 255 times. 2 families and 203 planets involved.
We actually lost 183 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 20.

39

(51 replies, posted in Universal News)

More lies from 04 - our leader messaged them 8 ticks ago waiting for them to sign nap - but they're ignoring and still taking planets

40

(51 replies, posted in Universal News)

yes - because threats to take more planets will really stop me calling you what you are isnt it?

41

(51 replies, posted in Universal News)

How were you lying ?

"we cleared you guys from our shares" which was roughly 30 planets or so

Theres two lies right there to start with. in  2 ticks you tooko 63 planets - including plenty in systems you were not in before.

63 to #5804
1 to #5800

You then proceeded to take another 100 or so over the next few ticks- I've yet to see any nap offer- you knew full well leader wasnt on so deemed that a refusal and took another 100 planets?

As I said.. lying twats

42

(51 replies, posted in Universal News)

Lying twats

43

(51 replies, posted in Universal News)

----------------
-   CAPTURES   -
----------------
89 planet(s) captured by Aname (79 %) (50 retakes).
2 planet(s) captured by gilmour99 (12 %) (2 retakes).
-------------------
60 from #5800
31 from #5804
-------------------
We overwhelmed the enemy 91 times. 2 families and 76 planet(s) involved.
We actually gained 15 planet(s) in total. Unfortunately they managed to retake 61.

----------------
-   BLOW-UPS   -
----------------

2 planet(s) from Aname have been blown up.

List of destroyed planets:
66,114:7 - 80,118:1

---------------
-   DEFEATS   -
---------------
90 planet(s) lost by Aname
46 planet(s) lost by gilmour99
44 planet(s) lost by Random
34 planet(s) lost by Flames
8 planet(s) lost by someone
-------------------
158 to #5804
64 to #5800
-------------------
We have been beaten 222 times. 2 families and 181 planets involved.
We actually lost 170 planet(s) in total. At least we were able to retake 11

44

(139 replies, posted in Universal News)

Morale loss should include a modifier to take into account families Sizes so : normal morale loss X attacking fam PCount/ defenders fam Pcount.

Would make farming of much smaller fams more difficult.

45

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

Do you accept now that when you said "Actually killing them is not permissible "

You were wrong:?

46

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

"That's not using a trap, that's sitting them inside a gas chamber"

Did you just make that up?

where on did you get the "gas chamber" idea from?

"euthanised" literally means ~"put to death"

please provide the source of your "gas chambers".

47

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

"Actually killing them is not permissible "

Actually, it is:

"(4)  If none of the other options are feasible, euthanized. "

48

(18 replies, posted in Politics)

Storm in a tea cup scaremongering aside..

1) This law does not apply to commensal rodents; i.e common rats/mice
2) For other species that are covered by the law, killing is allowed if relocation is not a feasible solution.

49

(53 replies, posted in Politics)

Okay I thought he was actually advocating that- after declaring that he would be happy to see hundreds of millions of chinese dead for his political ends it wouldn't have surprised me.

Sorry I was wrong.

50

(53 replies, posted in Politics)

"Put a law down flogging people who file share and file sharing in that nation will go away after you have flogged 1%. Make a law mandating nuclear war on any nation that does not flog it's file sharers, and actually use a nuke and not one nation will tolerate file sharing anymore."

Does anyone take this lunatic seriously?