Um why would we want a permanent military presence in Africa, then we'd be permanently fighting in Africa

besides all those guys are pals of China, Mao invented the term "Third World" as a rallying cry for former colonial states (like China considered itself) to unite together apart from NATO or USSR (under Chinese leadership) and China is big on investment, military advisers, techincial assistance and trade deals with developing nations in Africa and Latin America

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=m8rzkCkFIus

:046 lost forever

huh that's right you were fmods

I was one too once, then I got an arrow up my ass

If it was constitutional to require Americans to buy crap, then Alexander Hamilton would have tried to make a billion dollars with his Bank of US. 

But he knew no such thing is tolerable.

Same reasons it's preferred for plumbing - it doesn't rust, easy to work with, fairly cheap, with the added benefit that it won't degrade and explode the propellant

As a projectile it's heavy so it smashes through things, and when it hits people it tends to spread out to make a more effective injury.

The MAIN point is, almost ALL the ammo out there uses lead.  Steel ammo is federally banned because it's supposedly armor piercing.  So banning lead ammo is a stealth way to ban all ammo supplies in the USA instantly.

too soon?

I don't even think there's an argument here

except to say

what a slut

>>Perth is a city where you get nothing special...seriously, it was almost impossible for me to find decent coconuts...<<

I got your coconuts right here

http://www.florida-coconuts.com/

>>I love shellfish!  Where do you live that it's cheaper than other fish? <<

probably right next to the mercury storage tanks

>>Btw, is it really relevant if she is a slut or not?<<

Yes.  If her sexual lifestyle is freakaholic, then our national government should not require her employer to purchase coverage for her sluttiness as a condition of employment. 

Because required costs of employment tend to reduce the rate of hiring and perpetuate the unemployment crisis.  WHENEVER POSSIBLE, such costs should be reduced.

If she and her slut friends could choose to keep their pants up, or use the rhythm method, then employers should not have to bear the costs when they choose to rut.  That would help our national economy.

She had an oped in CNN today

"Editor's note: Sandra Fluke is a third-year law student at Georgetown University Law Center and has served as president of Georgetown Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
(CNN) -- Last month, students from several Catholic universities gathered to send a message to the nation that contraception is basic health care. I was among them, and I was proud to share the stories of my friends at Georgetown Law who have suffered dire medical consequences because our student insurance does not cover contraception for the purpose of preventing pregnancy.
I joined these students in speaking at a media event because I believe that stories of how real women are affected are the most powerful argument for access to affordable, quality reproductive health care services.
I also joined these students because now is a critical time to raise this issue in our public consciousness.
Thanks to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, preventive care services, including contraception, will be covered by private insurance plans without co-pays or deductibles. If appropriately implemented, this important law will finally guarantee women access to contraception, regardless of the religious affiliation of their workplace or school.
Obama calls contraception advocate Rush's 'slut' attack sparks furor Rush Limbaugh's apology spin
By now, many have heard the stories I wanted to share thanks to the congressional leaders and members of the media who have supported me and millions of women in speaking out.
Because we spoke so loudly, opponents of reproductive health access demonized and smeared me and others on the public airwaves. These smears are obvious attempts to distract from meaningful policy discussions and to silence women's voices regarding their own health care.
These attempts to silence women and the men who support them have clearly failed. I know this because I have received so many messages of support from across the country -- women and men speaking out because they agree that contraception needs to be treated as a basic health care service.
Who are these supporters?
They are women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, who need contraception to prevent cysts from growing on their ovaries, which if unaddressed can lead to infertility and deadly ovarian cancer. They are sexual assault victims, who need contraception to prevent unwanted pregnancy.
They are Catholic women, who see no conflict between their social justice -based faith and family planning. They are new moms, whose doctors fear that another pregnancy too soon could jeopardize the mother's health and the potential child's health too. They are mothers and grandmothers who remember all too well what it was like to be called names decades ago, when they were fighting for a job, for health care benefits, for equality.
They are husbands, partners, boyfriends and male friends who know that without access to contraception, the women they care about can face unfair obstacles to participating in public life. And yes, they are young women of all income levels, races, classes and ethnicities who need access to contraception to control their reproduction, pursue their education and career goals and prevent unintended pregnancy. And they will not be silenced.
These women know how expensive birth control pills can be, with or without insurance coverage. For a single mother with kids, a woman making minimum wage, or a student living on loans, a high monthly co-pay could be the difference between buying contraception or one week of groceries.
And imagine the financial burden of unplanned pregnancy and raising a child. For women without insurance coverage or with insurance that doesn't cover contraception, the costs create a significant financial burden.
iReporter on the contraception debate
Many women cannot medically use the least expensive types of contraception. As a result, many women, especially those 18 to 34 who have the most trouble affording contraception, simply go without. They face any number of medical risks as well as unintended pregnancy -- all of which damage their productivity and the health of their families.
Most recently, certain political commentators have started spreading misinformation about the underlying government regulation we are discussing. To be clear, through programs such as Medicaid, the government already does and should fund contraception coverage for the poorest women in our country.
But, despite the misinformation being spread, the regulation under discussion has absolutely nothing to do with government funding: It is all about the insurance policies provided by private employers and universities that are financed by individual workers, students and their families -- not taxpayers.
I am talking about women who, despite paying their own premiums, cannot obtain coverage of contraception on their private insurance, even when their employer or university contributes nothing to that insurance.
Restricting access to such a basic health care service, which 99% of sexually experienced American women have used and 62% of American women are using right now, is out of touch with public sentiment. In fact, more than 60% of Americans support this regulation and affordable access to contraception, according to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation.
Attacking me and women who use contraception by calling us prostitutes and worse cannot silence us.
I am proud to stand with the millions of women and men who recognize that our government should legislate according to the reality of our lives -- not for ideology."

http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/13/opinion/fluke-contraception/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

If you're torn between a week's groceries and birth control, you're a slut.

he grew up

why don't you