The following is an example of why I think this good idea will ultimately fail:
*This is directed at EVERYONE, k? EV-ER-RY-ONE.
A small amount of reasonable and logical on-topic-ness.
A vague reference to an unexplained and undisclosed point of contention, the discussion of which they shall now avoid like AIDS...
In favour of demanding their opponent accept they are right because they have decided that they are all-knowing.
There may possibly be a small amount of down-to-earth-ness to break the flow, garner some sympathy, interrupt their opponents' brimming righteous indignation, to distract them...
But soon they'll be back to being Jebus the Infallible Forum-Ninja, listing a load of uber-skills that have bugger-all to do with the topic being discussed...
"Yeah well I don't need to discuss The Benefits of Nuclear Power over Wind Power with you equally, I did physics in school"
Then they seem to do you a favour and offer to come down to your level from off of their lofty plane....
And even begin to sound quite reasonable. You might actually finish this discussion!
Then the words used start to seem "odd" yet still reasonable...
Then you get that Admiral Akbar feeling...
And suddenly you're either walking away, knowing you're right, with "Shall I tell you why they have left?" ringing in your ears, surely to try and goad you back; OR it is 8 pages later and somehow you're now arguing about what colour tie an IPCC inspector was wearing on his way to Iran and thinking "But I only wanted to know where he got his figures from".
*This is directed at EVERYONE, k? EV-ER-RY-ONE.