Im very confused by this rating.

''
1. Lets Make Love (3436) [57,76]     1283     8163262     69526

- 3427 +3 (good sor raid)
- 3423/3434 +2 (s4 clearning)
- 3438 +1 (semi farming)
- 3408 +2 (cheapish tactic)''

but let me try and explain how i think how you came up with this rating.

3436 has 8 points, because they raided 3427 at the start of round?
cleared 3423/3434 from sector 4
are semi farming3438 what ever that may be
3408 for cheap tactics

It is nice to see that someone is comming up with a new rating system, but this rating system is way of the scale. and you only know what happends in your own fam to be honest.

This is far too complicated Parrot imo

u forgot that we 36 warred with 18 as well. xd

It may be better than current ranking systems but it is really diffucult to apply. it needs good cooperation between fams, and participants should have same approach. Maybe a Board could be found to evaluate and give ranks to the moves.

But imo it is still diffucult to apply this idea.

Problem is, how many people would answer honestly?

What gondor suggested is better imo but still unreliable.

I think the server should calculate these kind of things to get a more accurate rating.
such as best attacker rating includes, moral lost, planets gained, overwhelmed enemy how many times, etc etc. - then post the top 100 or something in the forum.

for Bankers i dont know anything on the moment.

When you join the family, have the player choose his role by having a check box appear.
- Pop Banker, CF banker, CF/TO Banker etc
and attackers
- Hardcore attacker, retaker, attacker etc

the server will keep this in mind when calculating the player his score.

Though this might require massive codeing. i dont know about that

every score rating we're players have to choose or fill in things aint accurate and can/will be tempered with to up the scores of their family one way or another.

You Are Gay You Dont Count!

Genesis! I get an honorable mention if your family wins. Without me randoming a second time you might not have gotten that replacement for me and you could have lost!

I am in 18, I am a n00b//

Hmm too difficult to implement effectively i think. Perphaps ways to prevent farming could include...

I think 35% fam nw rule should go up to 50% possibly.

Also fam should have a limit on the number of planets they can grab from eachother. So, a big fam can only take a certain % of the smaller fams planets, depending on the difference in size between the fams. So the larger the difference in size between the fams, the less the bigger fam can take from the smaller fam. Whereas you can grab more planets from similar size and biger size fams.

These ideas could possibly reduce farming??

> Rin wrote:

> I am trying to come up with a new system to rate fams each round and declare the true winner not based on the eor size win. size win encourages nothing but farming and asking planet for nap etc which is essentially killing the game.

who are you to do this.

I forgot to reply to his thread. Lyv stop being gay and go get us some planets