Topic: My Political Stances on some topics
I am a politician in fact and in action.
I have been asked where I stand with regards to promoting alternative energy, animal bathroom runoff, and containment of such runoff.
First let me express I HATE subsidies. They are never fairly applied, with politicians choosing who gets what and what items are subsidized.
They are either used to pay someone off, to make an activist minority 'happy' or to make them feel 'good inside'. In other words to pay them off or make it look like you care and that you have helped that minority.
Subsidies are not fair, they hide the true costs of products or services which promotes waste, they cost all of society for the benefit of the few and should be the one thing Socialists, Liberals, Libertarians, Conservatists, and Constitutionalists should hate universally, if only for different reasons.
Politicians, who are in my mind are corrupt, who pass subsidies are vote buying, and again in my opinion... should be prosecuted for doing so.
Now to say I am against research is wrong. I am a results based reward type scientist.
If a nation determines something is important to do, such as producing better solar, then instead of throwing endless money at select companies... I endorse making rewards for meeting certain criteria, to be split amongst any winners. This is the DARPA model (and the X Prize model) which has successfully brough about a lot of new research on nationally important goals.
Promising rewards for breakthroughs allows EVERYONE to compete, not just the companies that donate to a specific party. Additionally the goal posts in a very large project can be moved as needed.
I would never buy new power production either. Either it can compete on it's own or it cannot.
As for animal runoff... a farm near me when I was growing up used their cow detrius to fertalize their corn, which was fed to the cows (milk cows).
As far as I am concerned it is a semi-valuable product that due to stigma is not being marketed fully. I prefer market based solutions to use it and I think such things are happening more and more. Let it grow on it's own accord so as to not cost us the taxpayer for something the market can correct.
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)