no you just have your head up your ass

lol

The military may not like Obama, but in the United States, historical tradition has leaned toward generals acting merely as appendages for their superiors, rather than as autonomous agents.  Of all the people, the generals realize the importants of a secure chain of command.

If such a scenario were even close to realistic, it would have been done during the Bush administration, especially considering the number of generals that retired in protest of the Iraq war.  (Not meant as some anti-Bush scenario.  Just using it as an empirical denial of your claim)

i agree with zarf about it being most likely when bush is president

and if mccain is elected..scratch bush and write mccain

yeah ..let's just hope there aren't MANY people like justinian in the government...

i would cross my fingers though, cuz there are a lot of people who're guna get run over by obama, and he's guna rightly make many enemies..he already has, lets's also hope they just rightly settle with the change, and maybe just settle for a flawless country (i doubt it--but hope is there )

That's true.  Obama can say all the change he wants, but it does not change the politicians of Congress or the members of the Supreme Court or the lobbyists.  Obama will be at odds and unless his supporters, who blindly follow his speeches as if they were from the mouth of God, start voting in Congressmen who actually believe in Obama's change, then nothing will get done.  Unfortunately for Obama, the Republicans still control a vast portion of Congress (regardless of how they are the minority in both parties).

I listened to a portion of Obama's speech and he mentioned a lot about what he would change and a few plans to change them...yet, no details.  He truly had the hearts of the young college students that have been getting a lot of free rides and only want more.  Whatever happened to the hard-working American?

"and you gotta admit SupAll his speeches are really something..they send chills down my back spine sometimes"

Hitler was very good at speeches, too.  However, I'm sure he sent chills down everyone's spines.  Not that I'm comparing Obama to Hitler, I'm just saying that a great speech is hardly something I look at in a President (otherwise, I wouldn't be so supportive of Bush).

"there is no hard working american in the race except him..from what i see"

Well, Clinton does have to put up with her husband and his past.  That's quite a bit of work there and don't even get me started on McCain's age.  Most of the people I see at that age are in wheelchairs (and I should know, I work at a hospital).

A coup would never happen and don't even expect riots.  The ONLY riots that would appear are the young college students that would cry "foul" because their Obama lost.  They'll probably claim "election fraud" and demand "recounts" and all the other kinds of bullshit young college students like to spout.

Please, the only people that are pissed at the President are the ones that have unwarranted hate.

Three or so months ago?  Three or so months ago, the violence in Iraq had dramatically decreased.  Then, Al-Maliki got some balls and stood up to the Sadr Militia, causing militias to start acting up again.  Yet, the Iraqi government (and now Iran) has begun to alienate Sadr and his militia to the point where their political power is diminishing and their militias are slowly becoming the enemies of the majority of the Iraqi citizens.

No one wants to be in Iraq for a decade or more.  I have never heard anyone say "I want to be in Iraq for a decade."  No one has said that.  Yet, those who don't support the effort seem to fail to see the risks of just pulling out.  Are we forgetting how easily Iraq could slip into destabilization to the point where terrorist organizations could influence the area and even gain far more recruits?  Like I said, those who hate Bush have no reason to hate him.  You have reasons to hate his policy, to hate how things were run, but not the man itself.  It's unwarranted.  People hating Bush because of his policies is like me hating my boss for putting me on a ridiculous work schedule.  Yet, I like my boss.  She's fun and light-hearted, I just don't like the way things are run.

So, yes.  It's unwarranted.  By the way, how ridiculous would it be if a group was willing to help people in a country get food, but once that food gets stolen by armed militias, the group doesn't want to go in and make sure the people get that food by having troops on the ground?  The democrats are hypocrites through and through.  Just look at dear Obama.  He's touted campaigning fair and positive yet, his campaign has fallen back to attack ads.

I'm not saying we should get up an leave, I'm jsut saying we need to start sending troops home, not sending troops in. I know a guy who will stay for a fourth tour of duty because Bush canceled out the withdrawl. He was supposed to be on the way home when it began, now I'm not using that as a sad story to wing this my way, but come on! And I'm not trying to say you want to be there for a decade, but my point is, why aren't the Iraqi's helping out? It is their country, and frankly, I don't see the point of our men dying over there if they're not going to help out, where is the Iraqi government's military that we have spent hundreds of millions, if not billions, on through training and weaponry?

> Justinian I wrote:

> Well he is a Socialist. The American elite aren't going to like that very much

Bush is a socialist too... the american elite are socialists... noob

haha

not all southerners are red neck trailer trash

maybe about 10%

but most are now open minded non trailer living in people

theres a bunch of yankees [tree]ing there sisters and having sex with sheep but i dont make fun of em

The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones that do.
If Not For The Gutter... My Mind Would Be Homeless......
ummmmm..... lemming soup!