101 (edited by Torqez 08-Oct-2009 03:51:36)

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

> Lee wrote:

> Look Bonanza ur missing the point of "THE NAP WAS AMMENDED"!!!!!

there was a new nap in place with new terms signed by the 04 leader at the time which was Steam.

So go away u'll still die


The new nap with the 20 system core?
If so i dont see the problem with 04 exploring outside your 20 system core.

Just Do It √

102

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

no a ammended nap

read the whole thread mate

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

You mean the part where it says that we had a agreement to stay out of each other cores?

If so how are all of us suppose to know the exact core systems?

How you know whats my core if i didnt tell you?

Or 2404 core if they didn't tell you?

As far as I know your core was the 20 systems that all of us signed in the nap.

Just Do It √

104

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

dude we made a new ammended nap with 04, ur fam wasnt involved in the loop.

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

it was for system 44 and to the west...
DOESNT SAY SHITT ABOUT SECTOR 1.... the truth has came out lee now go F*k ur self alrighty

Texas Made Texas Raised

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

Lee is right I believe.

(from a neutral perspective)

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

So Lee, you have shown us an apparently ammended NAP. Can you show ANY evidence that the ammendment was agreed upon and signed by BOTH families?

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

can u prove the systems we expoed in were in NAP agreement??? cuz they arent tongue

Texas Made Texas Raised

109

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

i aint even gunna argue no more theres 4 pages of that.

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

YOu don't have to argue, but imo, at least show them the Amended NAP.... I think they deserve that at least.

111

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

ermm i posted it allready.

it was signed by Steam and WS.

112 (edited by Gondor 08-Oct-2009 02:02:02)

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

> Lee wrote:

> 02-Oct-2009 23:37:58

Legendary Criminal
    Solar Defender

Re: **Naps**

amended deal with 2404

in sec 3

2404 gives us control of systems 44,y and east

they get 43,y and west

we also get to keep anything west of 44,y as long as its not north of x,95

we are allowed in x,94 and below smile

We stay out of each others systems.

This was the ammendent to the old nap


signed? where?...

Where's the ingame? What you posted was just a forum posting with no one's signing. Just WS posting it...

2011 IC League Fantasy Football Champion
2012 IC League Fantasy Football Runner Up
2013 IC League Fantasy Football Champion

http://www.ic-wiki.com/index.php?title=Gondor

113

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

well when WS posts summink i beleive it, not just that but i had ingame msgs also.

and tbh i dont see what it matters, they broke nap they didnt break nap? who cares?
war still continues wink

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

It goes to show whether the provocation you are using to justify it is bullshit or not, and it appears you have proven it is.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

115

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

PRovocation?

i need provocation to end a 48hr nap? hehe whats this game coming to

u war u get flamed
u dont war u get flmaed
u delete u get flamed
u go inactive u get flamed
u farm u get flamed
u dont farm u get flamed

do u realise its a war game? obv not

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

I'm saying that you said you were provoked into warring 04. In your first post you have blamed them for starting the war by breaching a NAP. Then you won't back up those statements.

If you just said "We are warring them because we want the planets", well and good. But trying to put it back on them, I would like to see proof that they breached the NAP so I know whether I can trust you in future NAPs I might make with you.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

117

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

> so I know whether I can trust you in future NAPs I might make with you

hmm lol?

anyways less than 20 ticks to go till the 20 system thing expires

wink

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

So I should take that as a no? As in you will change conditions at random and claim they were agreed to? Fair enough, I will make sure to not NAP you then.

Insanity and genius are closely related!
*** Eltie for mod! ***
Failing Lemming of Teachings and Australian Cop Orgies: Gwynedd

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

Okay this is the story from start to finish:

Our NAP (04) with (05) was a CORE nap only, outside systems valid for attack and op.

We (04) were fighting with lees fam over the area east of y44, and they were comin west of y44 towards our core. SO WS said stay west of 44 and well stay east of 44 in S3. So i said okay that sounds like a plan, and thats that. It wasnt a NAP it was words between 2 guys, and i stayed honorable and stayed west, never went east of 44 in S3.

05 was planning on attacking us from what i heard from alot of players, and so i figured we should strike first instead of them. Thats when Nightwish randomed into my family, perfect timing. So we did a full save, had tons of res/cash saved up, squeaky and NW expod in 05's area NOT violating the NAP agreement of cores with 05. Us and our allies planned to cancel NAP and attack 05. With squeaky and NW jumped all over thier core, our allies coming in from the west and us coming from the south 05 wouldnt have had much chance. They saw what was happening and decided to either start a war with 23, or "fake" a war whatever i dont know which is true and honestly i dont care. Being honorable players we decided not to attack 05 while they were in war, so we used savings and jumped infra, and were gunna move on to glues fat ass fam. Thats when 05 decided not to war 23 all of a sudden and declare on us clearing the portals.

THATS THE STORY 100% true and honest. Lee i never violated NAP, and everything ive said to you is true.

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

You know Lee, if you had just been honest and said "we are cancelling nap - war time!" then it wouldn't even be an issue. Instead you had to come up with some lame ass tard lie that you can't talk your way out of.

Nice work bud

2011 IC League Fantasy Football Champion
2012 IC League Fantasy Football Runner Up
2013 IC League Fantasy Football Champion

http://www.ic-wiki.com/index.php?title=Gondor

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

exactly

And the whole 23 war thing is lamest shitt ever

Texas Made Texas Raised

122 (edited by Prophet_WS_IC_Legend 08-Oct-2009 03:17:38)

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

all the whiners lol im loving it keep it up plz as i enjoy the whiners whine smile

simply put no matter what u think about the nap or agreement 05 did nothing wrong in clearing 04 from systems outside their 20 system core.

all the planets in sec 1 we had every right to clear even if we were at war with 23.

now that the nap has bee cancelled lets just war.

AND UR WRONG BARBATOS THE 23 THING WAS REAL PERIOD, THEY JUST DECIDED TO NOT GET RAPED IS ALL

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

123 (edited by Torqez 08-Oct-2009 03:56:48)

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

well its all good... just quit makin us look like NAP breakers and shitt cuz we stayed out ur 20 system core... i mean honest damn does ANYONE actually BELIEVE they had empty planets in their 20 system core?
LMFAO no

Texas Made Texas Raised

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

well i do like leaving empty planets in my core so other people can explore them for me smile

keep that in mind, if u watch ur core real good its always good to leave places for dummies to explore them for you then u take them as free planets smile

and im not gonna call ur fam nap breakers im gonna just say u made a bad decision exploring all around us with a small guy and then spending all ur stuff instead of saving some knowing that that might cause us to decide to go after ur fam when we saw it.

that was the mistake right there, as far as the rest i think a lot of miscommunication caused some of this problems. i think squeaky is honorable guy but someone made a bad mistake in judgment spending before waiting to see how the war went with 23, i mean had we warred them and we beat them in 2 days due to our savings vs their lack of savings then we wud have moved to ur fam right away anyway and u still wudnt of had any savings and in same shape anyway.

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 2405 Vs 2404 - 2422 Vs 2409

ROFL...

So 04 does get kicked in the nuts for doing the honorable thing. Ahh GG... Well played 05 well played.


For those who DO NOT get it btw, the problem is NOT (see the caps) that 05/22 declared on an alliance around half their size and nw. Not the issue here. Cause I havent seen ANY of the 04/09 players complain about that even once.

The issue is, they had a "war" going on with 23 which stopped 04/09 from getting the initial strike (which they very much deserved btw cause they got fair shares which couldnt be cleared), used the confusion to clear all dangerous shares (which would have actually evened out the war), AND THEN declared on 04/09. Because you know what the funny thing is... It takes coordination to clear a low nw guy. And it takes time to make sure that you have someone on low nw to do so. This takes time which the other fams woulda used except for the bullshit that 05 pulled.

I find it hilarious. Again, well played.

Can you take the Chocolate Rain