"Then you shouldn't have started the topic to begin with if you had no real intention to discuss it."
I'm discussing it just the way I WANT to, not they way you say I have to.
"So you concede the debate then."
Lol. You don't get it, do you? This is not a Cambridge university lecture hall. This is IC Political Forum! There are no propper ways of debating anything here, which is why I am here. I happen to like the notion of not being restrained by established conventions of intellectual discussion.
"I think given by your concession it is obvious that the idea is a waste."
You assume I conceded something. Why? You insult me, tell me I have to discuss this that and the other in this that or the other way, and you expect me to WANT to discuss anything with you?
Thought you were cool, Lizon, but I guess I was wrong.
"So now your afraid of big brother?"
You're not? How very foolish of you.
"false sense of urgency to convince people that your way is the only way."
At the moment, all I am seeking is the an alternative to the established way WHICH IS THE ONLY WAY NOW, and failing!
"That is the path chosen by those who are obsessed with power, and such claims are usually a clear indication of desperation."
Wow. So you're a physicist and a psychologist now, are you? You're a regular savant, now, aren't you?
Which one of us is the one more obsessed with power, I wonder, hmmm - the one who tells the person with whom he is debating how exactly he should debate and what exactly he topics should discuss; the one complaining the other isn't arguing conventionally enough (this is all you, by the way), or the one who is arguing for more power for the individual to take care of themselves THEIR OWN WAY, so they need not be dependent on the grid (and other infrastructure of the authoritarian state) for their survival?
I'll answer that: YOU are.
