The Media Elite, Hollywood (for the most part), Rockefellers, Kennedys, and now Bill Gates.......

Hardly a Republicn there.

Most people know that the democrats and the republicans and both right wing parties, with the republicans being a bit more to the right.

USA is probably the only country (with more then 1 party) where all the real parties (2 in this case) are both so similar that you could probably merge them together and not see a big difference. But ofc they need 2 of them to be able to say "we are democratic".

"
USA is probably the only country (with more then 1 party) where all the real parties (2 in this case) are both so similar that you could probably merge them together and not see a big difference. But ofc they need 2 of them to be able to say "we are democratic"."

yeah, other countries use more then 2 parties to create much more elaborate lies to make them appear democratic.

The problem with a parliamentary system is that when so many people representing so many deferent views and morals each with their own agenda come together they do nothing but squabble among themselves. The system never takes the initiative to do anything because its incapable of doing so. We can look at history to prove this. In the beginning of WWII England's Parliament was split over the crucial decision of action or in-action.  They had to turn to a single person, as a source of leadership, to confront the challenges the world had presented.

"
lol... americans are so patriotic when it comes to their system of government and they don't realise that a parliamental democracy is more balanced and more democratic than a presidental one. more than two parties are a good because than more then 2 views are represented. look at how many different groups you have inside your 2 parties. Libertarians, conservative democrats, neo-conservatives, liberals, socialists, centrists etc... in a multi party system it is also easier for a totally new party to make it big."

i dont know about other americans but to me, "more democratic" isnt a complement. democracies are mob rule. mob rule is not a good thing in my opinion, and parliamentary systems and systems with more then 2 parties are more likely to be victims to mob rule.

@avo

so you would have have a multi
-party system where actually 1 party rules as we see in russia?

avo didn't say anything about economies.

...He's accusing you of being a Communist?

but then again I could be totally off track.

You Euro-Socialists are so far left, anything to you all is "Right-Wing."

The Democrats are doing their best to look like you all.....
/me wonders why ??

Republicans seem to be doing their best to look like Democrats.

@ Belhaven Beast
you write:

"aha ha ha, come on, anybody can make a list like that, ok, here's mine

The Media Elite, the Bush family, Alan Greenspan, etc, hardly a democrat there"

ROFL..........Yea, the Bush family make my point of Republicans trying to look like Democrats.
Alan Greenspan ???

HEHE.......thanks, you almost make my point ever clearer.

To me the american "democratic" system is extremely flawed.
First of as I said, they have two very (yea they are) similar parties, not that they have the exact same views, but their goal is more or less to make the very rich people richer.
Secondly their goal isnt to benefit the larger population, but to benefit their benefiters (the ones paying for their campaigns and so on). Or to say it like it is, the ones that bribes them, meaning the companies.
Thirdly, the people doesnt even trust the government to do what a government is supposed to do: govern the people and represent them. Which is an enormous flaw in the system. And with two (bribed) parties to chose from and news networks that often are owned by the two parties and in other cases doesnt want to be unpatriotic, they make sure that the people doesnt know anyone else to vote for...

A big failure in my eyes.

Ah and of course the parties themselves doesnt rule the country in the end, but one person from one of the two parties (to a large extent).

Put in a few more parties, have them get the same amount of tv time, and skip the countrywide "election of president candidate" (thats really up to the party who can represent them the best...), ah and ofc make the bribery of the candidates and parties illegal. That would make it good I think

right wing is subjective. someone could argue they're both left wing parties. the cash the parties get is very much limited inorder to make it so that rich people cant give that much money to the parties.