I found a 7%!

"The American and British shipments most notably in the Northern Arctic route resulted in the loss of 58 ships and damage to many others. That was just over 7% of all ships that sailed to Russia."

So I see that it was indeed helpful, but it wasn't the be-all-and-end-all.

"By the end of 1945, over 57,000 T-34s had been built: 34,780 original T-34 tanks in 1940

"The factor I consider most important is that we delivered early, we delivered fast, we delivered quantity."

yup.

"Germany would have also had 100% security over the oil of the region,
which would have dramatically altered the war, I mean DRAMATICALLY!!!!"

yup. But to what extent, who really knows.

O/T though...

> Einstein wrote:

> So as you can see sir, I do know history, and I do stand by my politics

I never said you didn't know history. And I hardly thinks this proves anything about politics. I was quite content knowing that I had learnt something, was grateful for it, and I had no reason to go back into the name-calling or "discussion".

But then going and telling me that this proves that you should stand by your politics and policies (assuming you mean all of them) just shows how deluded you are.

You_Fool: "so should we also teach ancient roman and greek mythology as a viable history of the earth?"

Agreed. If Creationism is to be taught in a /science/ class room alongside theories like abiogenesis and evolution, then so, too, should the creation myths of non-Biblical origin. I always liked the Boshongo creation myth from the African Bantu peoples. Stephen Hawking has told of this myth, speaking of how the god Bumba "vomited" the sun, moon, stars, and all the animals found in Africa (or at least, the ones that would have been encountered by the Bantu tribe and their ancestors).

I am sorry, I have seen proof there is a God, I will not have you dissuade me. Nor will a significant majority in the United States nay say that there is a God.

Your views are in the MINORITY in the nation, and in the world.

Besides creationism is NOT religion teachings.

Creationism says we are created by something else, that the odds of our existence, and the existence of all life on Earth is not even a possibility without such creation. Therefore we are created, but to what aim, what purpose, why even is left out.

Yet you are so anti-religion you cannot even understand we are even leaving the door open for aliens to have created us.

> Einstein wrote:

> I am sorry, I have seen proof there is a God, .

hahahha, unless he came out of the sky and said "g'day" then you are delusional.

>Your views are in the MINORITY in the nation,

In your nation, yes, and this is truely disturbing.

>Besides creationism is NOT religion teachings.

What is it then? Scientific teachings? Maybe it could be called philosophical, but that would also be inappropriate, as in philosophy you base your thoughts and observations on the world around you. Religion ignores observations from the world around around us, and instead supplies us with plenty of "God acts in mysterious ways"

@Economatrix

You are quick to jump to conclusions. Nowhere did I imply that /scientific theories/ should be, or indeed are, somehow contradictory with religious beliefs. Whether you implied this or not, I don't care: the distinction is still a necessary one to make. Science and religion are not mutually exclusive, however creationism is not a /theory/ in the strict scientific sense of the word; ergo, it has no place in a science class curriculum. This was my initial point. Moreover, Biblical creationists in particular tend to purport their theories as having scientific basis. This was another point I was attempting to dismiss. If Biblical creationism deserves serious discussion in a science class, then so, too, do the creation myths of other cultures and religions which are just as valid as claiming God created the Earth as literally described in the Book of Genesis.

Your layman Google definitions are fine, but they are wholly inadequate and the second definition you supplied has nothing whatever to do with what I said. Nowhere did I ever imply creation *myths* -- of any sort -- are scientific theories; they do not even rate as a hypothesis. You, apparently, are unaware of what a hypothesis even is, or are suffering from a severe misunderstanding of what I intended to convey. Feel free to try again when you are slightly more educated in the matter.

Don't listen to me, the public have no right to know.

Were you honest about your health when you were asking for votes?
Did the people that voted for you know about you health?
Would they have voted for you had they known the truth?

Like it or not, the following questions are valid questions to be asking of someone in your position, Michael.

  1) Do you have a mental illness.
  2) Do you accept treatment for this illness.
  3) Does this mean we can trust your decision making and judgement?
  4) Does this mean you should hold the position you hold?
  5) Why should we fuel your delusion?
  6) Why should we play your game?

I lold

Mental health problems such as depression are incredibly common and it is very short sighted of you Fokker to make any mention of them. Many people suffer from conditions such as depression and many people also make full recoveries. Someone's previous problems may not in any way hinder them or affect their thought or decision making processes.

That was a low blow and was full of ignorance about mental health issues

> Einstein wrote:
> When I ran I was clear of depression, besides it is an unpaid position, and I only solicited 3 votes, all people who knew me. 90 something people voted for me
As for the rest, your just a troll. Go away troll <

  Are you afraid of my valid questions? Or do you think the public do not have a right to know? I have to ask because some of the more important questions have gone noicably unanswered.

> Sitting Duck wrote:
Mental health problems such as depression are incredibly common <

Really? It's a good job you pointed that out to me otherwise I'd have never figured that out during my weekly visits to the shrink.

> and it is very short sighted of you Fokker to make any mention of them. <

Because telling Flint to go and get some real help rather than just chanting "I'm better now, I'm better now" whilst surfing for survival on the tsunami of the mania that will inevitable lead to an almighty (and if previous experience is anything to go by, very public) crash is so short sighted so ast to be legally blind?

> Many people suffer from conditions such as depression and many people also make full recoveries. <

  And all of these people do this WITH PROFFESSIONAL HELP, not by self deceit and happy thoughts.

> Someone's previous problems may not in any way hinder them or affect their thought or decision making processes. <

  Not telling me anything I don't already know. About Flint. About you, on the other hand, this say a great deal. You are, at time of writing, unaware that I am a medicated mental patient, aren't you? And you are also unaware of Flint's very public admission of his mental health problems (not solely deprerssion, but bi-polar disorder, and then some) and his very public admission that he is refusing all treatments and therapies because he thinks he knows better than the doctors, who are quacks...
  ...To be honest I think he's right about the quak part; If I had made such refusals I'd have awoken one morning to find my room filled with police officers armed with CS Spray and doctors armed with... um... whatever that white shit in the needle is... I think it's Valium.

> That was a low blow and was full of ignorance about mental health issues <

  Hmm... I could be a gentleman and let this slide, after all, you didn't know... But...

http://tiny.cc/qWh4u