>>He clearly could of done alot worse than he did.... And he did not shouldnt ur Goverment be happy he did not start selling secrets or getting ppl acess that wanted to do damage<<
Then he'd squat for life in Supermax, the top federal security prison that is tougher than the punishment block at Gitmo (Gitmo prisoners get to yell). He landed a moderate charge for what he did.
>>. Instead they scapegoat this guy..<<
He said he did it. How is a guy who confessed a scapegoat.
>>Yeah i think he should be punished he broke the law and probably knew he was breaking it.. I think its just very harsh the lengths the USA are going too.. Its like they are saying dont [schnitzel] with us or this will happen<<
That's a function of our criminal law. I bet any Brit who thought about changing all the names in the Social Security database to "Bush Sucks" will back off. Hey you know what? DON'T PISS ON FEDERAL DATABASES. Giving yourself admin status and implanting a bug to let you come back anytime...Jesus! You hack the [POOFING] United States Army?
>>Its got Bush stamped all over it if u ask me..<<
More like Richard Clarke, the heroic critic of Bush who wrote a memo in April 2001 saying 'watchout for al Qaeda (and spend money on it in 2002, but forget that part! he's a visionary!!!)' who got kicked down to Cyberterror Czar. This hacking crap is what he warned the 9/11 Commission was our greatest vulnerability.
>>You really think this guy should get the book thrown at him..<<
No, I said a fine would do. This is reportedly the largest hack of US govt systems ever, so it has to set a precedent in how we handle it. And that has to more than a slap on the wrist. that guy who put 30 weather balloons on a lawn chair and flew at 40,000 feet for 2 hours got a $150,000 fine, and that stopped all wannabes, so I'd settle for that. If found guilty on all counts he'd be liable for $1.25 million if not prison time.
>> I dont think so and if u do ur as crazy as the ppl that are allowing this to happen<<
hmm he might have a good argument on 5 of the 6. Saying that repeat offences become a felony if the combined damage is over $5000 may be a stretch of law. They might be able insist he get charged with 95 misdemeanor counts and 1 felony.
But he's guilty...so....
Look here's how our system views it. Whats the worst type of criminal? A crook who knows he's guilty, runs from the law, fights the process every step of the way, drags everything out, insists he isn't sorry and will probably do it again. That guy oughta have the book thrown at him, right?
So a guy who knows he's guilty, runs from the law, but surrenders and cooperates as far as letting the trial go forward without busting chairs and appealing every ruling, he shouldn't get the book thrown at him, right? The system ought to encourage people not being the worst crook you can be.
And a guy who knows he's guilty, says he's sorry, surrenders to the indictment, gets a lawyer and seeks a plea deal, he deserves some real consideration.
With our crowded prisons and the cost of incarceration, then, who goes home early and who might not get sent in?
Now what is jerko doing? He tells newpapers he did it, but so what, he's fought extradition for 6 years, he made his case a diplomatic issue, he's got the BBC making incorrect reports about American laws, he promises to fight it in American court if he's thrown over here, he's making suicide threats...he's a brown starfish and he's gonna do hard time. He didn't have to but he worked it that way.
Messed up...well maybe you don't screw with us? Don't have sex on the beach in Dubai, and don't hack as admin on US servers.
The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.