>>1, Jesus' endorsement of the murderous immorality of Yahweh in the Torah<<
Based on what? Your subjective mores?
>>2, Jesus' doctrine of "eternal punishment" in the "eternal fire" of Hell<<
What is a "successful" doctrine? One year less a day?
>>3, Jesus' failure to claim actual divinity<<
He does several times.
>>4, Jesus' failed prophecy of his imminent return<<
Where?
>>5, Jesus' failure to competently reveal his doctrines (concerning e.g. salvation, hell, divorce, circumcision, and diet) in his own written account or that of an eyewitness<<
By "competent" I take you mean on pleading paper, properly captioned, in the form of an affadavit, dated and signed, witnessed, and notarized?
>>6, Jesus' failure to perform miracles the accounts of which cannot be so easily explained as faith-healing, misinterpretation, exaggeration, and embellishment <<
You would explain away miracles as faith-healing? "Oh that's no miracle, that's just psychosomatic spotaneous regeneration!"
>>7, Jesus' failure to attract significant notice (much less endorsement) in the only detailed contemporaneous history of first-century Palestine<<
Are you in the AAA guide?
How can you claim to exist then?
>>8, Jesus' failure to recruit :
a) Anyone from his family<<
His Mother.
>>b) Any acquaintance from before his baptism<<
His "cousins", and his "brothers and sisters"
>>c) A majority of Palestinian Jews
d) Even some of those who heard his words and witnessed his alleged miracles.<<
This is discussed in the Gospels. If you don't know what Jesus said then you really aren't debating "Jesus" but "somebody else's God". It is like condemning Galileo without reading Galileo, but, arguing what you imagine somebody in Galileo's shoes shoulda oughta have said, and then being mad Galileo didn't say your speech.
The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.