>>wow the [banana munching pig gurgling] arrogance in this sentence right here. When you live in a country where education is guaranteed dont you think the government has an obligation to fulfill that and make it acceptable to go to school?<<
Where do you get off just making things up? You need to know the limits of your knowledge. Something in your head should tell you "hey I have no idea what I'm talking about" before you make things up and post them.
>>Do you believe that there can be an economy when lending freezes?<<
Lending never froze. Stop listening to the rhetoric. Are you in the business world? The system was strained, but it was still functioning. All of this "we must take BOLD action now!" rhetoric is useless. We need the right action, not actions that will only strain the system more while adding tremendous amounts to our debt.
>> Think about that the next time you want to buy something with a credit card or you want to buy a new car. If you don't get the loan, you won't buy and in the end the company will go out of business.<<
If I didn't get my last car loan, I would have made a little less money on an investment (I was making more on interest in my investment than the loan's interest would cost me, so I took the loan and payed it off in a few months). I would still have the car. What if everyone spent less on credit? We wouldn't have this "crisis" we're talking about now! How horrible would that be? It'd be nice not to have to pay for idiots.
>> And give him some time to cut spending... <<
Let's be honest; after spending trillions, cutting a few billions means nothing. He's NOT cutting spending. He'll cut some programs and some budgets, but he is NOT cutting spending. Complete nonsense. He's increasing government size, spending, and control.
>> We are faced with a huge recession and you want him to work miracles.<<
We are not faced with a "huge" recession. The numbers are exaggerated because he and his staff know this generation is a bunch of pussies who always figure no one could have had it worse, even when unemployment has been MUCH higher than present in the past, even when inflation has been MUCH higher than presesnt in the past. I can't believe how much baseless rhetoric gets repeated in here. I'm not getting any more content than Obama gave us earlier. None.
>>Give him atleast a year before you get full details. ... You can accuse him of lying after a year.<<
He said he would bring transparency. He said he would always give lawmakers what, 48 hours to read his legislation? Now he's spent more than a trillion without giving legislators who passed his bill time to even read it. That was transparency? That wasn't lying?
>>Attacking her says a lot about you. It reeks of desperation.<<
I've never consulted anyone 1500 miles away concerning roof repairs. Have you? Just seems a little ridiculous to me. Maybe she should have written a letter to her local, county, or state legislature? They're surely much more aware of the economic suicide her area must have committed, or the corruption that results in not even having a functioning roof. In any case, it seems a little ridiculous to need Washington's support to fix a roof. If that's the best example a president has, he hasn't got any good examples.
Obama is going to half the annual deficit after 4 years. The first 3 years he will spend increasing the annual deficit [he's gotten a great start REAL fast!] so drastically that cutting it in half after 4 years seems like a cut. I don't want to talk about the politics of this not being fiscally responsible in this thread. I want to talk about how he's misleading idiots by saying he's going to cut the deficit in half... AFTER HE INCREASES IT YEARLY FOR 3 YEARS. He doesn't say that second part which is necessary to make the statement coherent. He is lying to you.
>>So he's got a plan it seems. You dont know that whole plan and so all of a sudden he's a liar. Awesome.<<
We've pointed out lies he has made. They make him a liar. Nobody cares what plan "it seems" he has to you. He's not into transparency. Details aren't going to come. Some of them might come a few hours before a vote on a trillion dollar bill. Should we wait until we don't even have time to read a bill, let alone debate it, to debate it? (AGAIN?)
Amen concerning Congressmen, SungodRA. Unfortunately, even the state level is already mired by the same sorts of nonsense that mire the federal government. Options tend to be limited and the choices are few.
[I wish I could obey forum rules]