Topic: Neo-Liberalism
This is the often not talked about side of Liberalism.
This is the side where war, disaster, and famine are desired, not misliked. Where poverty, disefranchisement, dictatorships, and worse are welcomed with opened arms.
This is George Soro's bread and butter as he steals billions from 3rd world nations via making their currency worthless, then buying as much of it up as he can, then letting them rebuild their currency.
This is open border advocates secret backer, as the money sent back home has yet to ever financially rebuild those nations... where does the billions go?
Fact: There is 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants inside the United States. If they only earned say a net of $300 a month (After any and all expenses), and they sent home 50% of their net they would be sending home $21.6 billion, thats $21,600,000,000 of hard currency.
1 U.S. dollar = 10.7250107 Mexican pesos (obtained from google)
A tourist, staying in Hotels, and eating at Resteraunts can expect to spend $750 a month in Mexico City. If they stay at a Motel, and eat from vendored food they can spend $500 a month. This is of course tourist rates. The cost of a "Middle" Class house is 380,000 peso to 1 million peso's. Thats 35,430 USD to 93,240 USD. This means with the cash sent 420,000 "Middle" class homes can be built just on the cash sent in.
Or businesses could be built.
Yet the cash never seems to be spent in such manners.
Russia for instance made a 100 Euro cost vessel which will make 70 MWe (thats 70 million watts) which can make 1 million USD annually... and it's so expensive because it is a ship, not a fixed structure. It cost 3.7 billion Euro they figure for a power plant to make 1600 MWe. That would be 22.8 million USD a year if the power was sent to California. They could make 5 of these suckers if they wanted, per year, from incoming cash.
Yet the cash never goes that way.
Instead sent cash makes the rich get richer it seems.
And this pleases Neo-Liberals to a fare-thee-well.
The ideals of Neo-Liberalism is to keep the poor poor and the rich rich. This does not mean persons, this means nations.
This goes hand in hand with companies like DeBeers, which disrupts the diamond trade for it's profit, fighting any efforts to stop the fighting, since this would affect their bottom line, and their sponsors who live in certain rich countries. It's like the EU, where several nations dictate to the rest of the nations, and grow on the back of those other nations (Hope you like that expensive headquarters which no one is helping you pay for little nation #1)
It is this group which fights world police ideals, stops wars which will restore balance and stability, and funds wars which creates instability. This same group then tries to abuse the people in those unstable nations.
Free Trade is an anethema for them, and an answer. Carefully managed free trade fits their ideals.... but thats not true free trade. Instead true free trade scares them, since then they cannot profit from it being squelched as well as a managed free trade.
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)