Topic: Neo-Liberalism

This is the often not talked about side of Liberalism.

This is the side where war, disaster, and famine are desired, not misliked. Where poverty, disefranchisement, dictatorships, and worse are welcomed with opened arms.

This is George Soro's bread and butter as he steals billions from 3rd world nations via making their currency worthless, then buying as much of it up as he can, then letting them rebuild their currency.

This is open border advocates secret backer, as the money sent back home has yet to ever financially rebuild those nations... where does the billions go?



Fact: There is 12 to 20 million illegal immigrants inside the United States. If they only earned say a net of $300 a month (After any and all expenses), and they sent home 50% of their net they would be sending home $21.6 billion, thats $21,600,000,000 of hard currency.

1 U.S. dollar = 10.7250107 Mexican pesos (obtained from google)

A tourist, staying in Hotels, and eating at Resteraunts can expect to spend $750 a month in Mexico City. If they stay at a Motel, and eat from vendored food they can spend $500 a month. This is of course tourist rates. The cost of a "Middle" Class house is 380,000 peso to 1 million peso's. Thats 35,430 USD to 93,240 USD. This means with the cash sent 420,000 "Middle" class homes can be built just on the cash sent in.

Or businesses could be built.

Yet the cash never seems to be spent in such manners.


Russia for instance made a 100 Euro cost vessel which will make 70 MWe (thats 70 million watts) which can make 1 million USD annually... and it's so expensive because it is a ship, not a fixed structure. It cost 3.7 billion Euro they figure for a power plant to make 1600 MWe. That would be 22.8 million USD a year if the power was sent to California. They could make 5 of these suckers if they wanted, per year, from incoming cash.


Yet the cash never goes that way.


Instead sent cash makes the rich get richer it seems.


And this pleases Neo-Liberals to a fare-thee-well.



The ideals of Neo-Liberalism is to keep the poor poor and the rich rich. This does not mean persons, this means nations.


This goes hand in hand with companies like DeBeers, which disrupts the diamond trade for it's profit, fighting any efforts to stop the fighting, since this would affect their bottom line, and their sponsors who live in certain rich countries. It's like the EU, where several nations dictate to the rest of the nations, and grow on the back of those other nations (Hope you like that expensive headquarters which no one is helping you pay for little nation #1)


It is this group which fights world police ideals, stops wars which will restore balance and stability, and funds wars which creates instability. This same group then tries to abuse the people in those unstable nations.


Free Trade is an anethema for them, and an answer. Carefully managed free trade fits their ideals.... but thats not true free trade. Instead true free trade scares them, since then they cannot profit from it being squelched as well as a managed free trade.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: Neo-Liberalism

I guess I'm a Neo-Liberal.

Re: Neo-Liberalism

Me too a little*blush*

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered
automatic weapons."-General Douglas MacArthur
"Cluster bombing from B-52s are very, very, accurate. The bombs are guaranteed
to always hit the ground."-USAF Ammo Troop

4 (edited by Acolyte 24-Mar-2008 02:31:52)

Re: Neo-Liberalism

Free trade is free trade, period. No restrictions, no tariff, no customs, no taxes, no embargoes, no "Free Trade Agreements". Anything else isn't free trade.

Caution Wake Turbulence

Re: Neo-Liberalism

> Acolyte wrote:

> Free trade is free trade, period. No restrictions, no tariff, no customs, no taxes, no embargoes, no "Free Trade Agreements". Anything else isn't free trade.
What an ideal world you have there.

6 (edited by Little Paul 25-Mar-2008 18:01:14)

Re: Neo-Liberalism

maybe wait a little with the free-trade debate. Me and the other paul automaticly vomit every time we read the word alone.

Re: Neo-Liberalism

OMG!!! I puked in by rucksack. EW!!!!

ITS ALL OVER MY TEXT-BOOKS!!!

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered
automatic weapons."-General Douglas MacArthur
"Cluster bombing from B-52s are very, very, accurate. The bombs are guaranteed
to always hit the ground."-USAF Ammo Troop

Re: Neo-Liberalism

Justinian I: "What an ideal world you have there."

I guess you can call it a world of principle.

Zarf BeebleBrix: "Question: Are you assuming that free trade is awesome, and defining that which is awesome, with the inferrence that anything else in conflict with that isn't as awesome, or are you simply defining random words?"

Definitely the former.

Little Paul: "maybe wait a little with the free-trade debate. Me and the other paul automaticly vomit every time we read the word alone."

You really shouldn't. I've met many Statists who have no problem admitting free trade is almost a necessary component to sustaining their flailing socialist economies for any reasonable amount of time.

Caution Wake Turbulence

Re: Neo-Liberalism

"The ideals of Neo-Liberalism is to keep the poor poor and the rich rich. This does not mean persons, this means nations. "

It means both..

I'm a fan of the Keynesian model, although it's much despised by the USA nowadays. It has proven it's worth after the crash of '29, and with several countries on different moments (i.e. Belgium in the middle of the 19th century and Ireland in the 20th century). Keynes means a more social approach (mind you, socialist, not really socialistic), rather then a liberalist approach (wich has lead to the great depression of '30s). Another thing that's really a downside of liberalisation is that certain governmental exploitations have to privatised, like the trainnetwork, the postal service or even the electrical market. In all these situations, it has worked extremely poor.. Some things are better left under the guard of the government wink

God: Behold ye angels, I have created the ass.. Throughout the ages to come men and women shall grab hold of these and shout my name...

Re: Neo-Liberalism

"You really shouldn't. I've met many Statists who have no problem admitting free trade is almost a necessary component to sustaining their flailing socialist economies for any reasonable amount of time."

he means that we just don't want to hear anything about the subject.I love free-trade.

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered
automatic weapons."-General Douglas MacArthur
"Cluster bombing from B-52s are very, very, accurate. The bombs are guaranteed
to always hit the ground."-USAF Ammo Troop

Re: Neo-Liberalism

paul valter pihlo: "he means that we just don't want to hear anything about the subject.I love free-trade."

I see. I must've mistook your severe indigestion as a sign of contempt.

Caution Wake Turbulence

Re: Neo-Liberalism

"I see. I must've mistook your severe indigestion as a sign of contempt."

LOLZORZ:p

"Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered
automatic weapons."-General Douglas MacArthur
"Cluster bombing from B-52s are very, very, accurate. The bombs are guaranteed
to always hit the ground."-USAF Ammo Troop