> V.Kemp wrote:
> Ignored is exactly what ye're bein'.
I quoted ye repeatedly. I'm always very specific, I'll warrant ye. Go away. You're not worth th' time. <
And once again ye miss th' point. See, th' problem here is that ye be not as super-awesome intelligent as ye think... You claim t' be respondin' t' repeated statement that I made, but yer responses sound like ye be addressin' someone who is a rapist, or is at th' very least a supporter o' rapists, an' me posts, followin' yer first point-missin' post, be quite clear in their anti-rape intent an' content.
Remember this?
> Rape is only wrong because society says it is is wrong, an' even then only fer scallywags. Did ye know that pigs dern't merely have sex, Dance the Hempen Jig The male frequently rapes th' sow in order t' impregnate that comely wench, now, is that wrong, by Davy Jones' locker? Is that immoral, on a dead man's chest! Should I punish me piggie, Ya swabbie! <
What I actually wanted t' do with this were bein' explore th' line, th' fuzzy non-border betwixt th' black an' th' white, a discussion based upon th' premise that rape is a natural occurence that we have somehow, at some point, made unnatural.
But ye di'nae get that did ye, I wonder why?
"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."