76 (edited by Gekko 05-Oct-2008 16:19:56)

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

"and no rejoining.where u land,u stay for the rest of that round..(just like in r/l deal with it)" 

That would most definitely kill the game for good.


No drafts is nonsense, drafting is just a major important part of the galaxy. Just look at the times when MW was non-draft, those were the days that Andro was most played too.

BTW:
I agree with Zidi's post for the full 100% big_smile
GOOOOO ZIDI!

...meh...

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

nah, no drafts is good. But players aren't really all that skilled anymore and a lot of ppl want to play with their friends. So that's it

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Zidi u almost scare me sometimes. Every post ive seen of u in the past 2 yrs is like tearing my mind out and putting it in u:) so i agree with u like 99.9999% of the time or u agree with me 99.99999% of the time:)

Im really disapointed with this reshuffle. With days left we were told there wouldnt be 1 and now not only are we told there will be 1 after just 1 round, but now people want 15-20 peeps per fam back. usually when something is being successful u stick with it. I would agree 100% to going with 15 player fams if we had double the players we have atm in ic.

I played during a time when there were 100 fams per gal and when the merger happened we had 200 or something like that in andro, it might of been 150, but I remmeber my allies being ranked 119th when they got hit and they were no wheres near the bottom+ they had 16 players somewhat active! I also watched ic fall from that high down to 20 fams per gal. I was in so many super fams with 18-20 player fams as well as seeing alot of other super fams. These super fams meant alot of unequal playing field starting off from the get go and alot of raping on smaller fams. Evan with 15 player fams we had the best start we ever had and anyone had in ic in andro. Double the nw of the 2nd ranked fam atfre 10 days! double the nw of the top fam in mw after 10 days when rounds started sametime, we had 13 players out of 15.

I spent yrs trying to get the mods to reduce alliances,fam sizes,round leght and increase starting gc/resources for what i thought was not good for me, but good for ic. I dont see an overall complaint about it other then older players wanting 20 player fams again or the middle generation wanting less fams because they know ic with 20 fams per gal.

The fun we had with 100+ fams!! U dident have to worry about just 1-2 fams, u had to worry about all of them, all were unknown variables in the gal.. 50 fa m gal this round u had so many peeps playing and so many fams. We started off very inactive, joe missed the 1st 2 weeks, we had 5 people start off, i missed the 1st 5 days and mainly evo and kagar were active early on and we still survived and still had fun+ plenty of all differant kind of size fams to deal with good or bad+ we had no ally!. I lost maybe 150 planets this round if not more and up till last week i was still maken 3m a tick counting resources. For a fam ranked 25th or so that was plenty good and I would play in a small fam like this any round! If not for the #1 fam really hurting us I think we been able to save up and do a jump to really hurt another top fam, we managed to fend 1083 off when they were #1 and we managed to beat 1102 when they were #4 as well as hold our own with 55 when they were a dominating #1 and we never had to worry about competeting for #1 nor did we worry about sitting on 15 planets and being so small.

People were upset the top fams dident do much this round, well thats the way ic is now, every round is differant, but poeple are mostly inactive, so u wont see all kinds of great competetion anymore as the old days till we get alot of new players in over time.

The only thing u needed to change was reduce the systems by 10-20% without a reshuffle. I thought it was good to explore longer then usual as long as the systems are filled with 2 weeks to go, as it is now were still exploring lol.

So here we are, after alot of recent success nolio decides he wants more people per fam and less fams per gal, so rigs the voting? ALot of people dont realize or care whats good for ic mods! alot of people just care whats good for them at the current time and not whats good for ic!

Joe/orbit wanted 20 players per fam and 20 fams also, after a while of explaining to him why that be fun for 1 round and bad overall he came around big time. He wanted this because he grew up with it and knew nothing else.

Trust me when i say this, this makes no sense! A few peopel convinced the mods as well as nolio convincing the others that this was needed. I mean just last month u had to open another gal for the left over players, but now your reshuffling capri so u can have less fams? more players per fam is always bad.

I played for 7 yrs straight or so and trained more people then anyone and thats a fact. U cant get to know 20 people in your fam personally or train them as good as u can and should with 12 players. How many of u have done full fam starting strats with 20 players? I did it for yrs straight and its a huge strain and it sucks!

BAD BAD BAD move big time

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

no drafts is stupid like PP said if somethings going good u dont change it hmm
i feel that decisions like that will drive more ppl away from IC, arnt u trying to get ppl back? well sticking to something good is the way forward but changes in other areas are needed but dont abolish drafts in capri sad

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

for me I liked the no draft round very much, and I also like reshuffles a lot. So PP_ everyone has his own preferences. Besides you can still play with 4 other people now and that is still very nice.

But I agree on the famsizes.. Less fams which are bigger just ruin things.. It will decrease the competition badly, because you will get one powerhouse alliance who were way more lucky with their randoms.

Keep the fams of 12 or make it 15 at most, make the map smaller and we are good to go. This will result in more fights on closer turf and way more competition. That is what I liked this round ... even though most fams slacked haflway.. there was never one family really the best, but there were many good fams smile

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Everyone has their own opinion and all should be heard, but at the sametime alot of peoples opinions are biased and selfesh. I dont know u EL, but yrs and yrs ago I was pushing for smaller fam sizes when I was sitting in fams with 18-20 players winning rounds non stop. I saw how unfair it was to alot of the smaller fams and knew this would hurt ic over time. I was recomending lowering drafts during a time when I could make 3 full fams with all the friends and peeps we had wanting to play with us in m00lar/playboy. I was also recomending to get rid of tri alliances when others kept wanting them evan though they were bad for the lijmited about of peeps we had:(.
Also reshuffling more often is good yes, but too often is bad. If u reshuffle every 2 rounds it allows people to play with the new peeps they meant+ train them, u reshuffle every round and people wont bother training as much and then rshuffling every 3 rounds just allows unequal fams+ if u reshuffle every 2 rounds the mods can adjust things more quickly with amount of fams and other things.

I started playing in r2 and I had to deal with all the beta n00bs calling me a n00b just beause they started before me. Most of the beta players were among the most rudest people ive met on here. However we did have a ton of players back then and a ton of fams, what a fun time it was overall. Winme started around sametime as I did as well as laurence did. We can tell u alot about the experiance back then as well as the continued experiances we have had since then as we played steady since then except for maybe winme, but kagar and I played non stop and seen all the changes for the worse happen to ic and how the old mods( lizzy time ) said ic was dead and refused to change anything.

I think my opinions are unbiased and unselfesh and I try to say whats best for ic, not whats best for me to win next round or win anytime or have the most fun for 1 round while others suffer and after playing for so long while others like nai among many others have taken 3-4 yr breaks and are not up to date and informed about ic. I know i took the last 1.5 yrs off or so, but thats nothing compared to the amount of time i played and the recomendations i made as wlel as the changes that have happened from them.

15 player fams with 6 drafts and less fams is bad idea, mayeb consider 13 player fams with same drafts as now and 45 or so fams and the gal maybe 15% smaller, lets not forget to consider having the systems small also, that would be a cool new strat to play with.

also reshuffle every 2 rounds, keep the rounds 2 months and nevre go back to 2.5 months as well as keep the extra gc/resources to start with so the start goes a bit faster and u get more fun sooner.. More rounds u have with more fun sooner= more fun overall:) reshuffling every 2 rounds allows for quicker adjustments.

If were lucky and we dont screw the progress up then maybe just maybe we can have 100 fams again in a gal!.

Also dont worry about the competetion in the top fams, u cant force people to fight, but there certainly was alot more happier small fams this round and alot less whinning/complaining about small fam raping as well as alot less crying about nap breaks. Thats great imo!

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Being a big mouth, I can't help myself but comment on all and any topics, even ones I am not well briefed on tongue

What PP says makes plenty of sense; in the current situation the fams probably need some marginal amount of drafts to gain a core of experienced players who can then teach others.

I just want to point out, however, that "keep drafts to save IC" argument has been around for 5-6 years. It has been around every since Stefan introduced the draft system. There were very many great fams before you can draft and experienced players taught the n00bs a great deal because there was no option to draft in somebody scary good, you had to make ur fam scary good.

So from my point of view, there's two possibilities: either drafting as a whole screwed up IC or its introduction just happens to perfectly coincide with the beginning of the slow decline. Since we cannot know, we can only try to experiment with different set ups and see which one works best. So I think it's only logical to cut down number of players, allies and drafts since it has become obvious the larger numbers don't work. At the very worst, mods will get the perfect set up wrong and make fams too small or something (if that's even possible in these times.) But the experience will be important so they can get the size right the next time.

Cut fam size, # drafts and # of allies. it has shown it doesn't work, why cling to it? In changing it you might make another mistake, but if you learn from every mistake you eventually get it right. Sitting on ur ass never fixes anything.

I don't fear beer :x

83 (edited by PP_ 05-Oct-2008 18:21:33)

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Hey deathz:) U come back to ic around sametime as i? long time no see big guy nice to see u.

cutting fam sizes,drafts and allies is needed atm, but only due to the limited players:( I do think there was 3 main reasons and maybe a bunch of minor resons why ic declined.

1. Limiting how new people joined ic hurt new players, ironic how it was always the same peeps playing and hardly new peeps? Hint virgo

2. over drafting. U had as mnay as 9 drafts in a 20 player fam. I rmemeber fighting 1 tri in mw ( winning) and in their lineups they had maybe 25-30 players in the ( at that time) ic hall of greatest players. All these so called great players all bunched up in 3 fams!

3. Stefan/older mods not wanting or willing to do anything for ic.

U can add nap breaks, treating people like crap, small fam raping as all minor reasons as well as over sized fams,alliances once we started losing alot of people.

Anyways I know what we will have next round and If im here or not I think its a good thing and it wasent taken 3 steps back as i feared they might.

Nolio does do something;)

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

It's kinda  funny how ic  always winds up getting tailored to the needs of the popular few. tongue

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Busturchops tells us what u think would be best for ic? and is it the same as what is best for u?

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

less talking more acting ! <3 all ! nothing can mess my mood !

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

I haven't really come back to IC myself, just came back to lurking the forums a couple of days back. Nice to see you are still active around here though ... Stefan should definitely give you like a life time VIP or something smile

I don't fear beer :x

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

yea I have been around since r4 smile I have played a lot of different way too. And I agree on fam-sizes, I just dont think it matters much if things get reshuffled or not big_smile

Elrohir
"Abstract art is the product of the untalented, sold by the unprincipled to the utterly bewildered.."

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

> Undeath wrote:

> > Darksider33 wrote:

> keep the map size the same, it's good but either keep same total fams or cut down few, make the round longer, i want allow tri-alliance, keep it more fun

i think the player size is fine, 15 players, hmm ok


are you kidding, why in the world would we lower # of ppl with this size of a galaxy? the round ends in 3 days...and there are still planets that havent been explored

-----------------------------

My Response: i'm not kidding. I personally think bigger map and unexplored planets never run out, this gives small fams a chance to grow, other fams a chance to try dominate in farther distance to attack other fams, if the unexplored planets run out, there will be warring, ofc, but small fams remained very very bored and DO nothing, and this leads to more inactives, or caused others to quit early

i dont care if the map is too big, im actually happy with the current size we have now...now in reality check, do you think we will run out of planets in the universe? :-P

Proverbs 11:14 "Where there is no guidance the people fall,
But in abundance of counselors there is a victory."

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Yes, the galaxy size never bothered me. If someone wanted to attack a family they did, no matter the circumstances. The bigger galaxy did allow players to gain better spread and also made it difficult for families to keep them secure. But the amount of family in the galaxy needs changed to make the whole galaxy more competitive. We can't have families with 3-5 players when the round starts as we had this round.

Also reducing the galaxy size a bit won't hurt either, maybe by 10-20%. This way it will definitely increase conflicts for the next round.

Bubonic : Kaos_Theory : Forgotten_One : Lord Amaterasu : Kutner : Nubz_bware : Seis : Smartass P                                                               
                                                 

          "Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway." - Unknown

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Big galaxy, fams 15 players, works fine. PP agree on most smile

Lets keep this thread a Nomination thread then, and make a new thread for the size/fams discussion.....

waste, the legacy of mankind.

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Its funny that especially PP starts to whine about reshuffle. Guess his plan with Orbit and Kagar is ruined tongue

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Joor how is it funny? Inititally i was upset. We had made plans, promished people spots and now at the last mind they decided to reshuffle. Half of us were inactive most of this round and the other half dident evan get into the fam till mid round and now we got 11.

In anycase after my frustration I still spoke my mind with what I thought would be best for ic in the long run and not best for me or anyone else trying to get super fams and super drafts together to dominate easly. Better to spread the wealth of talent around in more fams then less fams, so  i know what we will have now and i think its good, though got no idea why we had to reshuffle this round and not next lol.

calm down Joor;)

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

i do agree PP...since when do we reshuffle back to back rounds? thought the point of a reshuffle was to break up powerhouse fams. and honestly i am not looking at any this round.

dont see why we would need a reshuffle.

also...Joor you should stop posting "its funny that" in every post you make because not everything is so damn funny....idiot

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Who knows, maybe I'm joining Kagar next round, wouldn't that be hillarious?

It's just that we could've expect a reshuffle after Nolio and KT said the galaxy was too big - making it smaller without a reshuffle could place several families in a "black hole".

All I care about is that next round makes more sense than this round. yikes

96 (edited by PP_ 06-Oct-2008 01:39:23)

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

Joor i know u wont be a draft in kagars fam next round, however if i do play and u randomed into us ( not 100% sure if im staying )u would have the same opportunity/choice that any other will have. Stay and have fun with us and get to know the better side of us and have fun:) or do whatever u got planed:). U be suprised over the yrs of how many peeps ended up randoming into us and ended up staying:) loads of ex enemies. I think maybe 1-2 i regret allowing them to stay as do they

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

*neglected to read all of the posts, and is to lazy to actually copy/paste zidi's post. but if i wasn't so lazy thats what i would do*

<KT|Away> I am the Trump of IC

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

12 players a fam is okay, no reshuffle this round.
BUT the galaxcy need too be a lot smaller, there was now the whole round enough  exploring planets. 25% smaller is better. So there will be come more and intressting Wars.

I'm Aries or Ivo :-)

Re: Vote on 'Next round Capricorn? What would you like?'!

PP, I played with you and Kagar before. Doubt that you remember me.