I find it incredibly ironic that a man named "Einstein" is actually unable to comprehend Albert Einstein's theories of special and general relativity.
Right then. Here goes comes some bunkum-physics busting.
"If the means to create blackholes exists with this device, then the sun creates millions every nanosecond... it's simple science"
Incorrect. The cores of stars varies from a few million to a few tens of millions of degrees. In electron volts, this corresponds to an average energy of 0.3-3 mega eV. The LHC will accelerate protons to velocities of several TeV - a thousand thousands times more energy than the average particle in a star's core.
"Everything collides in the sun, and often at the speed of light."
Einstein demonstrated that: m = m_0/SQRT(1-v^2/c^2)
where m is the relativistic mass of the particle, m_0 is the rest mass of the particle and v is velocity of the particle relative to an observer. As v heads off towards the speed of light, the denominator approaches 0 and the equation diverges towards infinity in this limit. Thus, as the particle accelerates, its relativistic mass increases, making it harder to accelerate. Thus, any particle with a non-zero rest mass cannot reach a velocity equal to or greater than c.
"and even if things would go terribly wrong and a black hole would suddenly become selfsustaining in energy nobody of us would know cause we'd all be dead in a matter of seconds( or not dead since nobody knows what happens in a darkhole."
There is a relativistic quantum mechanical process known as Hawking radiation, which is a process itself built upon well established and observed relativistic quantum mechanical processes. In short, Hawking was able to show that black holes can evaporate, and this evaporation rate is inversely proportional to the size of the black hole. Ergo, the large a black hole starts off as, the longer it will live. Any black hole created inside the LHC will be tiny as the energy denisty will be quite negligible in comparison to some of the active galactic nuclei in existence. So don't worry - a black hole will fizzle our faster than a poxy roman candle firework.
"light has mass, mass can push. "
Light doesn't have mass; the electromagnetic field contains energy and thus is able to exert a pressure: p=hk/2pi (k is the photon's wave vector, defined as 2pi/its wavelength).
A photon posses an energy equal to its frequency multiplied by a constant, known as Planck's constant, h. When photons strike a surface, some of that energy is absorbed, some of it is reflected. Using well established classical theories - see Netwon, Maxwell etc... - it is easily shown that the absorbed and reflected photons generate a pressure. But that doesn't mean they have a mass... at least, not in the way you mean. 
"Since they can then keep tag teaming a statistically unlucky Proton/neutron/electron this Proton/neutron/electron can be sped up to the speed of light via incremental speed increases."
and
"Considering the constant bombardment and chaotic discord in the sun, then must be a significant portion when 'fired' in the correct direction exceeds the speed o' C, where in it can statistically hit a particle already propelled near C."
There's no reason to assume that the laws of physics in the sun are any different to the laws of physics in the laboratory. In fact, I think we know they're not... As such, the equipartition theorem, and other thermodynamic and classical laws would apply, giving rise to a Maxwellian distribution of particle velocities whose mean is give by kT/2 multiplied by the number of degrees of freedom the particles posses.
"So what?" I hear ou feebly cry. Well, as I've already discussed, it isn't possible for a particle to be accelerated up to the speed of light as that implies its mass is infinite, which requires an infinite amount of energy. I think, having just looked around under the desk, behind the back of the sofa and the place where my lost keys are normally found, I can safely say the universe does not posses an inifite amount of energy. Ergo, particles in the sun - or universe, or anywhere else for that matter - cannot be "bumped up" to velocities equal to or exceeding the speed of light.
There is a process though called Compton up-scattering, which is the reverse of conventional Compton scattering. In Compton up-scattering, particles with an everage energy A residing in an electromagnetic field with photons of average energy B, such that B > A, can find their energy increased upon a collision with a photon - this is classical binary collision stuff. As such, particles can gain momentum from the electromagnetic field. However, special relativity precludes the particles from moving at light speed. (Have I said that before?)
As for the LHC... particles collide in our upper atmosphere with energies higher than we're going to be using in the LHC experiment. We're constantly being bombarded by particles with incredible energies, but amazing life goes on. If you're unsure of this, I suggest you investigate making you're own "cloud chamber". They're relatively simple to make and online recipes exist.
Secondly, the energy denisties involved are not that large. The chance of generating a black hole is negligible. Even if we do make one, it will do very little except fizz a bit. It will not grow, it will not gobble up CERN and it will not destroy the world.
Damn. That's quite a bit of time I'll never get back. Oh well, must be off... work tomorrow, and I've got lots of exciting physics experiments to do...
To those who understand I extend my hand; To the doubtful I demand to take me as I am.
]
![Flash[light]ning](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/29283.gif)
![[TI] Lateralis](https://imperialconflict.com/forum/img/avatars/1280.gif)