yes, investigators who are trying to make a neutral estimation on things to come should be fired. there's too many people doing their jobs right these days.

Nah Einstein, these extremists want gangsters to run the nations.

"I will fight for your right to be wrong!" << S.G. Tallentyre
"I am a flexible centrist: not stuck on right-wing, not stuck on left-wing, and not stuck on centre...and I don't flip-flop either" <<< me
Fighting for peace is like stopping the raping of a virgin.

Lets run down the list

1) Bad guys break a pane glass window to get entry

2) Bad guys have a gun each, one a shot gun, another a pistol

3) The bad guys threaten the mom and her children

4) The mom pushes a gun out of aim

5) The dad seizes said gun

6) Bad gun with pistol aims at dad

7) Dad shoots bad guy first

8) Bad guy with pistol runs away, badly hurt

9) other bad guy goes after dad

10) Dad shoots bad guy

11) Bad guy is hurt, but still tries to get gun

12) Dad shoots guy dead

13) Hospitalized bad guy tells story

14) Cops confirm dad and mom do actually live there

15) Case should be closed, cops should shake hands of mom and dad

16) An investigator has the balls to say "they probably wont be prosecuted" when facts are quite obvious, and they wont be prosecuted unless the prosecutor wants to
    a) Lose the case
    b) Lose his job
    c) Lose some money to them
    d) Lose his wife when peer pressure makes her desperate to be part of regular society
    e) hangs himself for his huge mistake (or shoots himself if he is extremely cowardly)

In no case does the evidence in this show even a .001% reasonable cause to even consider the family in this matter for prosecution. This is an anti-gun arsehole who wants to push his agenda.

wait, wait.. the investigator is an anti-gun arsehole because he said they would likely *not* be prosecuted? would you have been happy if he had said that they were likely to be prosecuted or what?

if you ask me... this was self defence with using violence that crosses the border of that what is tolerated.

Instead of giving the finishing shot... he could slam the guy with the weapon as well.

As said, the guy was already wounded and by that easily to defeat.

I would sue the man for death by blame.

I fully understand that you wanna protect your family. But killing someone by doing so is not something that can be tolerated.

Einstein you have to understand, i'd love it if every bad guy is killed
but the face is, not everyone presumed guilty is guilty
in this case they are probably guilty but they don't have full proof of that yet other than their story

and you innocent until prooven guilty anyways, the investigator, can't really say oh they won't be prosecuted, and then possibly have to turn back on his word... it's the law, and quite frankly i'm not sure why you're bringing this up

do you really think before he said that, he actually thought about how he was guna phrase is it, so that someone far far away doesn't get the wrong meaning

"Its outrageous that Texans who claim to love their children didn't have a gun upstairs for Junior to run for"

but then you probatly would have 4 deaths now

It is very funny, why don't people start to think why the "bad guys" decided to assault an house?

Jezus christ Flint, are you even serious?

When he says "probably not persecuted" he just says it to reassure the family and the people that it's very likely they won't be persecuted, and he adds probably cause it's not his decision to make.

You blow this up to an anti gun freak pushing his agenda, get a grip flint.

> TheYell wrote:

> Flint if everybody who lied to a cop was lined up end to end, it--oh wait, that's New York City.

They'll talk to the neighbors to make sure they weren't having a barbecue or something like that...
__________________________________
Ever seen the end of the movie (right before the credits) "Gangster"?
That was regarding the cops but imagine it being civilians.

"I will fight for your right to be wrong!" << S.G. Tallentyre
"I am a flexible centrist: not stuck on right-wing, not stuck on left-wing, and not stuck on centre...and I don't flip-flop either" <<< me
Fighting for peace is like stopping the raping of a virgin.

> [TI]  The_Unknown wrote:

> Jezus christ Flint, are you even serious?

When he says "probably not persecuted" he just says it to reassure the family and the people that it's very likely they won't be persecuted, and he adds probably cause it's not his decision to make.

You blow this up to an anti gun freak pushing his agenda, get a grip flint.
________________________________
All hail God Flint! (j/k and you know it )

"I will fight for your right to be wrong!" << S.G. Tallentyre
"I am a flexible centrist: not stuck on right-wing, not stuck on left-wing, and not stuck on centre...and I don't flip-flop either" <<< me
Fighting for peace is like stopping the raping of a virgin.

I think armed burglars should be executed, if not by the victims then the state.

My reasoning is that violent criminals likely do not change, and become parasitic to society in the long-run. Their lives just aren't worth the cost.

Such a policy would also act as a deterrent.