"> CanadianTire wrote:

> Gamer, children are becoming sexuality active at younger and younger ages now. The whole point of Sex Ed (which hardly exists in America in any case) is to educate children, before they start giving each other oral. There was this thing on Oprah once about a 13 and 15 year old have oral sex in the back seat of a bus, while the other kids were egging them on like they were watching a sporting event.

While I approve of young people exploring their sexuality, I admit that 13 and 15 does seem to young for something like this. But the question here is: had they received proper sexual education classes, would they have done something like this?"

ye ok, thats the age discussion, i have no idea about when children get sexually active,
i know i got sex ed on school when i was 11, but  my parents told me all about it already when i was 10ish. i think ur parents will know when ur ready to know all that, atleast i knew all about it intime lol

<Stefan> looks alright to me, just a statue

and that, my friends, is the end of that.

and also one of the reasons why our community is losing more and more members =p

Primo faked the conversation with Stefan to keep seeing the penis X(

and now; if i did the same and used this:
http://redongculous.net/london/female-nude.jpg
as family picture, how would i get punished?

as i'm sure primo didn't forget to mention to stefan whose family picture it was in question. remember, people, it's just art!

it's not about breaking rules. it's about who's breaking them.

as usual.

I didnt mention who's pic it was, nor would it have mattered.
That painting is not a well known piece of art (afaik), but i would have to ask stefan about it as well.

This kind of reminds me when Decimus had edited an animation of a dancing fat man with Flint's head, and posted it as his avatar. That too could have been considered "art", and Decimus almost got away with it because of Flint's foolish name calling toward a -certain- mod (who I think has since retired, no?).

Anyway, the point I'm getting at is that there needs to be clearer rules with regards to this sort of thing. Otherwise, the accusations of mod abuse with keep on coming.

Just a minor note, but the game rules don't say nudity isn't allowed. They simply say that people who display nudity can be warned or deleted.

The key word is can. They can be, but they may not necessarily be.

In short, it is and always has been up to the mods discretion, as it was when the picture I displayed was used a family pic.

I think piefoo was a mod back then too

In any case, it's all irrelevant. Stefan says it's fine...which means, it's fine

bwhahaha :D

Hurrah for ambiguously worded guidelines! Let's keep the players guessing >=)

He has a point though, it's just a nicely shaped rock.

I find it annoying that 'the shades of grey' argument is being used, because quite honestly, that's never been the case before when it comes to regular players. Rules should not be open to interpretation, rules need to be black and white, cold and unforgiving. Othewise people will just make a mockery of them.

I say a Moderater should set a good example, this however is not a good example and will only create disrespect for this game's Authorities.