Re: Fat? PAY!
> Red_Rooster wrote:
> ZoZ,
I disagree because just because you tax the fast food chains and make it more expensive to eat there, does not mean it will have an impact on people's weight. Your suggestions sound more like going on a diet than a restaurant that serves these things. It comes down to the decisions the individual makes. You can find just as unhealthy food in a more expensive restaurant. So is it fair that the fast food chains are punished???
I'm not taxing the chains as company RR, I'm taxing the goods they sell. Important difference.
This is about making fast food less attractive as alternative because of personal / family budget restrictions, about making healthy food more attractive even at the lowest priceclasses. Hence also nothing against the expensive restaurants selling the fat goods. Those will cost significantly more than the burger from fast food chains, and than what you can prepare at home. The objective is stomping out the fast food as cheapest alternative, exposing the class that is most vulnerable to it to the health hazards of it.
That can be done by what i suggest.
Also, if cooking at my house is prohibited, I'll stand outside on the deck and barbecue!
Lastly: your sandwich example is nice, but I don't think you'll starve to death because of it. The idea needs refining as to supermarkets, agreed, but the ready made Mc donalds, KFC, pizza hut, etc, fast food products are a start.