I doubt it- I think its pretty irrelevant to normal people.

I'm a wanker!!!!

I wonder why we don't just ignore the Scientologists until they either fade away or commit mass suicide like every other moronic cult idea.

I'm a wanker!!!!

I'm a wanker!!!!

order is an illusion that governments throw over your eyes so that they can hold you in slavery. they tell you without their laws, without their corrupt policies, their robbery, their enforcment, the boogy man will hurt you, will ruin your life. when in truth they are the boogy man.

anon will wait for you to change.

funny because many anon have already claimed victory...

Well I don't claim to associate myself with Anonymous or anything. I will say that, in my humble opinion, market anarchy definitely seems like the most utilitarian choice for minimizing suffering in the world and sustaining peace between men. However, that is beside the topic.

> Einstein wrote:

> you dont claim victory against CoS unless CoS is utterly destroyed. They wont be killed when you remove tax exempt, they will be angry. They will be dangerously angry. You need to fight 100%, or dont get involved.

YOU dont claim victory against CoC unless its utterly destroyed, anon never claimed it was their goal. i think what you mean earlier is not that anon cant win without leadership, but that you cant win by backing anon without leadership.

Well avogadro, in anarchy, burning houses down may be acceptable by the majority, and know one ensures someone would try to cough them, will if i pay my taxes, there will always someone trying (at least in my country offcurse

> avogadro wrote:

> > Freelancer wrote:

>> "order is an illusion that governments throw over your eyes so that they can hold you in slavery. they tell you without their laws, without their corrupt policies, their robbery, their enforcment, the boogy man will hurt you, will ruin your life. when in truth they are the boogy man."

>>Lol you are right, but then again, i prefer to pay taxes than seeing someone burning my house down because its funny

>and whats stopping someone burning your house down because its funny? the small possibility he would be caught and put in prison, while in anarchy there would be a chance that he's caught and killed.

Except that in anarchy there is no motivation for anyone to attempt to stop, catch, and kill the person burning down your house.  In a non-anarchist state we have police who are paid to do it, but in an anarchist state the only reason someone would stop a person from burning down your house is that the fire might spread to their house.

You have to remember that human beings are not kind, helpful, or courteous by nature these are behaviours brought on by the illusion of order.  In a situation where there is nothing for them to gain by helping or nothing to lose by not, people will probably just sit back and watch your house burn.