626 (edited by Gwynedd 09-Jul-2008 08:31:35)

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

who gives a [w00f] how many rounds you played, if you have half a brain (and no life) you can be amazing at this game in one round.

top 5 for size. thank your attacker. you did [w00f] all.
blah jeeeeezzzz.

627 (edited by Gwynedd 09-Jul-2008 08:32:16)

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

> Cumsville wrote:

> who gives a [black pearl] how many rounds you played, if you have half a brain (and no life) you can be amazing at this game in one round.

top 5 for size. thank your attacker. you did [black pearl] all.
blah jeeeeezzzz.




lol....i was the attacker both times nub!

edit: thats how IC was back in the "good old days" or quoting cloud, 'that was old school'

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Ummmmmm why in gods name would you make RCs early on in the round and not just pure CF?  CF/TO 70/30 is untouchable unless you are going pop, if you ask me..... seemed to be pretty well for me til I was gone most of last week wink

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

hey 874.

it's 874/886 vs 885/879, fair? I don't see why you guys are still complaining?

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

isnt it routine to do cf/rc in bor?
the ratio for the rc always differ round to round depending
1) if you are warring or not
2) and if iron is expensive or not

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

TOs are too expensive with little return (given how little income you get first two days) to be worth building immediately

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Jack its not quite 879/885 v 874/886 yet

Unfortunately we haven't done all that much :-P Though you guys have declared us, most of the systems that were fighting over have been contested throughout most of the round so far. In fact you guys were whooping us :-P

Destiny is only for those too own to make their fate weak.

~ Geese

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

w0000tage big_smile

Frenzy
My President is black, infact hes half white so even in a racist mind hes half right wink

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

lol this pw thread is so cliche... everyone bitching about cloud

cloud making long posts justifying himself

everyone bitching back at cloud

people complaining about the bitching and cloud

people bitching about cheating and 2vs1's etc

seriously people find some originality like me showing 880 are silly as they just retook all the planets i stole... and they blew every single one...

The tallest blade of grass is the first to be cut

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

lol..did it out of spite i imagine babez tongue.

Pixies My pokemon brings all the nerds to the yard, and they're like you wanna trade cards?

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

INACTIVITY FTW!!!!!

goddamm im a fattie tongue

637 (edited by Render 09-Jul-2008 16:06:49)

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

> Selur Ku wrote:

> Render are you really that stupid.

There never has been anything to stop 81 from hiting opur allies so to say it would have been 2v1 is idotic.

You got some nereve accusing me of whining, I never complain in these forums and if you lose a war so what thats part of the game.

But when i see low life cowards plain and simply cheating, I will call it out always. If you think thats whining you really are a moron.



Selur is very sad u still trying to convince urself that we or our former ally have cheated, go ask anyone in this game, ally change is perfectly legal and always been. I say u whine because u say we cheat wink but the saddest thing is u are whining wothout a reason. Our fams had an early pNAP, and thats the reason ur fam and my fam are at the top, think about it

~Selur Niaps

tongue

(someone is pissed?)

EDIT: we never went at war vs 886

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

*urinates on house plant*

I dont smoke cigarettes because i like them.  I smoke because it hides the smell of marijuana thats seeping into the hallway atm.

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

*joins ehawk. its much more fun then reading you lot bitch and try to make yourselves look more like men...

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

> AweXomE B(.)(.)BS wrote:

> Ummmmmm why in gods name would you make RCs early on in the round and not just pure CF?  CF/TO 70/30 is untouchable unless you are going pop, if you ask me..... seemed to be pretty well for me til I was gone most of last week wink



If the team plays correctly or the market prices aren't too wild, the CF/RC start to transition into TOs later will always be stronger than pure CF into TOs. But then again it requires the resourcer as well to play well, and if the resourcer is a bit off and the market is a bit wild or on a strike, you could get screwed over a bit.

It's just like RavenClaw said really smile

je

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

if oyu have the right bonus and no how to fund research.... its more cost effective than making RCs.... PLUS it doesnt cost endurium wink

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Funding research is most often a waste before you get TOs.  This is all pre-TO building. Going CF/RC's will optimally give you faster a larger income than pure CF which in turn will make your TO switch more effective, which again gives you more cash to fund research with after the TO jump. You stop producing RCs once you get TOs of course, and you go funding from there. It's just for a head-start. The RCs you ca neither keep for the small extra RC bonus they'll give you, or demolish and rather get cheaper TOs if you're doing it in one large jump, or at least jumping a lot at once.

If this is played correctly it is better than pure cf/to in almost all the scenarios it can be played in.

je

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

I just fail to see the benefit in NOT constructing a building that immediately gives you 12.8 gc a piece.... that finishes in 6 ticks smile as opposed to anything else besides TO later on... especially when you can get the same bonus from the RCs by funding and not using up endy for it...

we all have our own methods, nothing wrong with that!  now, on another note, which popper is getting estormed first? tongue

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

If I knew the exact numbers I'd respond, but as I don't I won't. All I know is that the bonus gain from RCs before TOs come into play adds up to become more efficient than CFs only, and then you can demolish the RCs and get cheaper TOs once they come into play you start  funding. it actually works smile

*dances*

je

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Some people write ridiculously long posts here.  I just read the first couple words and if it's referring to how good they were in rounds past I move on.

And to answer your question aztek, yeah I've always thought that he is a Sam Jackson look-a-like.

The strong move quiet, the weak start riots.

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Im Sick Of These M'r F'n Snakes On This M'r F'n Plane!!!

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Ive wrote uber long posts

but i never once wrote about how good i was in previous rounds wink tongue

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

> Humidity wrote:

> Ive wrote uber long posts

but i never once wrote about how good i was in previous rounds wink tongue




Yup mainly because you would be lying tongue ..... JK

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

Reading half a page of this feels like reading the the Bible without spaces or punctuation, for 24 hours straight, from a distance of 6 feet

Just breathe. Another day.
[Flame] - 150% damage against newbies
[Lurk] - Invisibility. Cannot post while lurking.
[Keyboard Mastery] - +2 to keyboarding/Mouse skill tree unlocked

Re: **** Pinwheel Round 43 ****

> -RPA- [Shady] Space Cowbo wrote:

> Reading half a page of this feels like reading the the Bible without spaces or punctuation, for 24 hours straight, from a distance of 6 feet



Wow .... thats really weird ... you should get yourself checked out.

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot