Topic: IAs = ok this round; lying about the IA your in = asshole
please stop getting this confused... i didnt have a problem with the IA; i was in one myself...
I have a problem with this scenarios right here:
me: {attacks but fails}
person: any response not resulting in war
me: im learning how to attack, you are my only target at the moment (true each time i said it, so calling me a liar is subjective to the timeline); want to nap? (granted there are variations but ideally i attacked, then tried to get nap - as per sb fam strat instructions)
person: i dont want to nap but dont come near me and i wont bother you - (this is not an IA, just an agree to stay away - which i had with DK and we remained peaceful)
alt person: ok sure; lets team up (this is an ia; not quite a nap until they sign it) - lacoste replied with this... then i sign a nap with him... but he never signed it on his side... then sometime later - i mustve cancelled it when going through my foreign relations
however at no point did i do ops or spells or attacks against him
i dont have my messages anymore so i cant see what big responded with but heres the deal at this point...
2 of them have agreed not to fight me (big and lacoste - not sure if dk was in their ia or not) and a presumably 3rd has failed at fighting me and agreed to a nap...
raise your hand if you would think the 3 people youve agreed to be allied with are about to gang up on you?