Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

you care nothing about people stabbed and beaten to death because we lack self-defense? 

I don't want any part of your "civilization" thanks.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Yes Dragon,

Us "Ignorant" right wing American Nuts dont care about people, as long as we have our guns.

Espeically when those "People" are.............


Us right wingers also like to embrace our Constitution, and express our freedom.   Imagine that.

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Yea BW I just wrote that, you have to copy what I write? Don't really see the point in it.
Also you must be a very violent uncivilized people if you really need to have that many guns for self defence tongue

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

hells yeah!

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Dragon....

Yes, Particularly me.  I can speak for others....but I am uncivilized and violent as well.  After all, we enjoy invading weak countries, and bombing people indiscriminately.

I need as many guns as I can possibly afford w/my minimum wage non-Union job that Im trapped in. 

I also like to drink beer, drive a pick up truck, and Im a racist.  My education is crude and nondescript.

I also, believe in God, and hate non-English speaking people.

All because I support the intent of my founding fathers, and the US Constitution.
Did I miss anything ?

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Black wing and I are relics of an America that knows it was different from the rest of the planet and was glad of it.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

oh thanks The Yell X(

Remind me to raise taxes on hotels and legal assistants X(

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

@ Dragon ....
You write:

"But why would a rigth wing selfish person like you care about 10000 of your country men dying by guns. When 500-1000 dies by airplane you go to war about it however. Ignorant people."

>>>>>
Did you REALLY write this w/the Intent I thought you did ?

Are you referring the the 3000+ Citizens that were on their way to work one day ??   And a bunch of Islamic Radicals flew planes into the buildings they were working in ??

The Event that happened to take place in my city, that I witnessed Personally ??   That I lost one Close friend, and quite a few people that I knew ??

Are you referring to 9/11 w/that statement ?

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

When it comes down to it, it is responsibility.

If someone fails their responsibility punish them to the fullest. Including someone who shoots a clerk at a store or Osama Bin Ladin who devised a means to kill thousands in one blow and to damage our economy in the same step.

They are responsible for their crimes, so we seek to punish them. They could have chosen not to do those evil things, the killer and the terrorist, but they chose poorely.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Why can't you guys see things from both sides? really are so blind? Why are people evil when they are against your way of doing things!!!

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

hehe......

Funny.....  We now think those who dont agree with us are Evil.

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

112 (edited by The Dragon Agh 03-Jul-2008 15:31:36)

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Black_Wing
Yes I was refering to that.
It is distasteful to kill anyone for any reason ever except when your own life is threatened.

You can justify 10000 death each year by guns and say that you don't care at all, and then go to war with another nation over 1000 death.

Yes it was a terrotist act (if it now was, but nvm that atm). Yes it was awful. Yes it should be punished.
Yet.
Supporting guns that kill over 10000 people every year IN YOUR COUNTRY at the same time is soooo stupid. So wrong. So... well it's sad.


Also:
"The Event that happened to take place in my city, that I witnessed Personally ??   That I lost one Close friend, and quite a few people that I knew ??"

And how many people think the same way about gun murders? Thousands every year! But do you care? Nah.

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

oh thanks The Yell --

fine you're a relic too

btw you're in Oregon, higher taxes are like fog

"Why can't you guys see things from both sides? really are so blind? Why are people evil when they are against your way of doing things!!!"

who are you talking to?

Agh who says I help kill 10000 people?
Me who says our gun laws are a fine way for the common man to defend himself from American crime which is a lot worse than other places?

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

TheYell, I'm talking to/about BW ofc smile
Also it is a lot worse cause of the guns (ONE reason, there are many ofc).

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

115 (edited by Freelancer 03-Jul-2008 19:46:23)

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

TheYell

"or Osama Bin Ladin who devised a means to kill thousands"

It's easy to convice people to fight for one thing when they think they are fighting the evil.

Like what Neville Cahmberlain said in 1939 "It is evil things that we shall be fightinh against brute force, bad faith, injustice, oppression and persecution"

When people are conviced that they are fighting against the evil they will do everything you ask of them because they think God is on there side. Effective tactic since many do not know that the other side belives the some.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

"PLANTATION, Fla. -- The family of one of the men who was shot by a retired United States Marine while they attempted to rob a Subway sandwich shop said the customer shouldn't have pulled the trigger.

According to Plantation police, two armed men barged into the Subway at 1949 Pine Island Road shortly after 11 p.m. Wednesday, demanding money from the employee behind the counter. When they tried to force John Lovell into the bathroom, he pulled out a gun and shot both men, police said.

Donicio Arrindell, 22, was shot in the head and later died at the hospital. Fredrick Gadson, 21, was shot in the chest and ran from the Subway, but police found him in hiding in some bushes on the property of a nearby BankAtlantic. 

Lovell, 71, was the lone customer at the time. Police said he had a concealed weapons permit.

Gadson's grandparents told Local 10 on Thursday that Lovell was wrong for pulling the trigger.

"He should not have taken the law in his hands," said Rosa Jones, Gadson's grandmother."

http://www.local10.com/news/13594353/detail.html

with grandmas like her around  I need a gun

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

117 (edited by The Dragon Agh 03-Jul-2008 19:56:36)

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Um, there is no death sentence to robbing a place.
The guy that shot them should go to jail obviously.
I assume he could say that they threatened him since they tried to rob the place though tongue
I dunno, hard case really. Both are wrong, I'd say shoting someone in the head for trying to rob a place is worse they robbing the place though...

And I really can't understand it. When someone tries to rob a place (armed with a gun), why would anyone try to larm the police and try to stop them? That only puts themselves in more danger... let them get away and let the cops catch them afterwards? yikes
Or is the money more worth then your life?

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

"Police said Lovell, a retired Marine, wouldn't be charged."

What would have happen if the old guy missed the shots and the rubbers fought back and kill him? would they be charged?

119 (edited by BiefstukFriet 03-Jul-2008 20:18:50)

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Ofcourse they would be. Sucks to be a criminal, eh? ...

Je maintiendrai

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

But wouldn't they be defending them selfs?

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

They lost the right to self defense the second they entered that subway with the intent of robbery.

Je maintiendrai

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Hm.. ok but i do think the guy should have been charged and face trial.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Don't enable those kids to have guns and this would never have happened.
BW/Flint: "They would have gone in with KNIFES then!"
Then they wouldn't have been shot I'm sure...

25 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 391 845454 - Dont see them coming back up. Theyre out of the game. Pretender, will finish out of top 30.
------
4 Inventors: Back from Hell (8528) (x:93,y:21) 945 57233492

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

Dragon Writes:

"Um, there is no death sentence to robbing a place.
The guy that shot them should go to jail obviously."

>>>>>  End of story.  Move on you Pacifist Euro-Socialist.   Now I have the full story.

In America....we celebrate the Gentleman who wastes a few thugs.
They were trying to force the Clerk into a back room.   What do you think the CLERK feels about the hero stepping in, and saving this clerk from who knows what ??

YOU !?!?!?  You think the old man should go to jail.   Holy cow.   God bless America.

After all,.....Remeber...... It was the GUN that robbed the place, not two 20 year-old thugs.
It was the GUN that shot the robbers.....not the hero, 71 year old, Ex-Marine.

A thug is a thug.  Maybe you need a thug w/a knife at your throat.  Then, you will wish you had a gun.


Unreal.
Thats why we are Americans.

Come .......joust w/the master.
I'm always Right.   You are just intellectually Left.....behind.
Individual patriot, and a REAGAN Conservative.

Re: US Supreme Court: Do Not Restrict Guns

"Then they wouldn't have been shot I'm sure..."

No, instead they would probably have stabbed the old man to dead.

Je maintiendrai