Topic: Net Neutrality
I have been watching socialists to "moderates" on the issue for years. It is either a "true neutral" system with a regulating body or it is a light version of the Great Firewall of China..
The basic idea for the "best" version proposed is that providers provide to customers all desired content with no adjustments, filtering, or limits. Under such a system the scary idea of Google modifying what we see on content is supposedly averted. The problem is always in the fine print. It requires a big agency with lots of manpower and regulatory powers. In other words they are presenting us a kitten, cute and cuddly, which they plan to mate with the Alien from the movie series Alien and crush all of humanity with their powers.
The version socialists, communists, and fascists (sorry for repetition) are talking about creates a form of control over content ike they did to radio back in the day. Except they feel the center is located at liberalism not at a line between conservatism and liberalism. They would stop "harrassing videos", "things that misrepresent or lie about Global Warming", "stop gun ads and online sales entirely" and a host of other ever increasingly severe things. In short 1984 was written to describe this level of control.
No matter any percieved goods in the plan we must fight it like we would fight a law mandating only "water guns" are legal. This is one way the Republic can die.
I say again: "THIS IS ONE WAY THE REPUBLIC CAN DIE!"
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)