Research based on guesswork, is still nothing more than guesswork.
Long term science is just that. Long term. In order to validate the arguement, we would have to see actual satellite proof that the icecap was growing. And that takes years. So, we'll have to wait...possibly 2-3 DECADES to show a cycle like effect, that the north polar ice cap would be on the rebound.
And even NASA can postulate on what could happen.
I could postulate that the Dodgers are going to win the World Series for five years a row...that doesn't mean it really could happen, because you really can't predict the future until your standing in it.
Can you point to 100% accuracy for the date of January 1st, 2014 of what the Polar Ice cap will look like? Just you. 2015? 2016? 2017?
No, you couldn't, why? Because those years have not happened yet, and we can not guess accurately what the ice cap will look like in those years. Can you guess what the polar ice cap would look like in 27+ years down the road? Guessing games.
If, if, the polar ice cap were to grow, in the next 2-3 decades, and then it starts to shrink 2-3 decades after, THEN we will have proven a cycle. And then, and only then could we state there there is an El Nino, and an El Nina when it comes to climate change. Which would then debunk the whole Global Warming being man made. But this is long term science. This is decades of research. This is decades of emperical science. Observed science.
Theories are not facts until proven. And even the proven facts, can be replaced by new theories, making newer facts.
World was flat. The world was round. The world is egg shaped.
=^o.o^= When I'm cute I can be cute. And when I'm mean, I can be very very mean. I'm a cat. Expect me to be fickle.