Re: The letter C
I'm still ahead for my translation of Hamlet
did yU mEn "Im stil ahed fOr mI tranzlAxun uv hamlet"? Gz, cu yel, lrn tU spel, wil yU?
Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → The letter C
I'm still ahead for my translation of Hamlet
did yU mEn "Im stil ahed fOr mI tranzlAxun uv hamlet"? Gz, cu yel, lrn tU spel, wil yU?
ultimately our goal should be to reduce language to as few as possible, thus we become computers speaking 01011110111011101010101001011010010110011011
akqUalE, InstIn, Im trIing tU bring a litl sanitE tU a wrld bI fiksing wat iz EsenxalE an insAn alfabetikol sistim.
@xeno:
"but in inglix, lukilE, cer R apArentlE OnlE 44:"
No, that is only the case if you really try to have 1 character for every sound even the sounds that are now combinations. It really is more difficult, especially cause we are not used to the system. Also it merely replaces one sound with another whereas in the other examples (getting rid of qxc) gets rid of excess letters for sounds we already have one for.
"wE hav 26 letrs in cE alfabet. bI yUzing cu kapitolz az saOnds, wE naO get 52 letrs. wE olsO hav 10 numbrz, wiq kin giv us a tOtal uv 62 yUsful kRaktrs tU yUz tU reprEzent fOnEmz."
Although it might be fun to play with letters, I don't understand why you do the opposite of what we tried to do now: You make it more complicated and more difficult to learn. By using capitals you add an -easy as it might be- extra character. You add more characters and rules to the game instead of simplifying it. Often I agree with your basic idea, but your solutions still require some extra work. I hope you don't take that as an insult cause it really isn't. You brainstorm about it and it is only logical that out of 10 new ideas 1 will be winner. At least you dare to think about it where most people don't and I respect that.
@einstein:
"ultimately our goal should be to reduce language to as few as possible, thus we become computers speaking"
ultimately our goal should be to bring more logic in your language. To reduce the alphabet and getting rid of 3 excess letters that share a sound with other letters does just that. To reduce the amount of letters isn't a goal in itself.
Getting rid of QXC is easy and is really all I ask for right now.
It is not a difficult rule. Its not radical. Its not difficult to read or write, in fact even people who know English by hart can learn to write it in 1 minute, 2 if they are slow. You can easily read it without extra effort. But speaking economically the gain would be tremendous.
After 4 days, you won't even notice it anymore as it is almost similar:
It is not a diffikult rule. It is not radikal. Its not diffikult to read or write, in fakt even people who know English by hart kan learn to write it in 1 minute, 2 if they are slow.
"It is not a diffikult rule. It is not radikal. Its not diffikult to read or write, in fakt even people who know English by hart kan learn to write it in 1 minute, 2 if they are slow."
rIt, and sO imajin haO kwiklE sumwun kin lrn tU rEd and rIt wic a fyU mOr qAnjez? haO EzE it bEkumz, cen, tU fix cu problemz wic cE inglix lAnguij?
olsO konsidr, if wE qAnj cu letr nAmz tU cu mOst comon saOndz Or mOrfEms, wE kin rEly simplfI cings. wE mA not get rid uv letrs, but end up xOrtening wrds, wiq cWd alAO pEpWl tU rEd fastr, lrn propr pronunCAxun just bI rEding.
wen wE stRt qAnjing letr nAmz tU reprEzent morfEms, wE kin rEly mAk progres.
fOr exAmpl, wE yUz 'tion' a lot.
Y not mAk a letr fOr it?
az fR az wE hav cum, cer R stil menE problems wic cu sistim, 8 mAjr problems, az indikAted bElO bI astrisk*
A -
*Ar - eəʳ (where, air)
a - æ (cat, black), ə (away, cinema)
*aO - aʊ (now, out)
B -
b - b (bad, lab)
C -
*c - θ (think, both), ð (this, mother)
D
d - d (did, lady)
E - i: (see, heat)
*Er - ɪəʳ (near, here)
e - e (met, bed)
*er -
F
f - f (find, if)
G
g - g (give, flag)
H
h - h (how, hello)
I - aɪ (five, eye)
i - ɪ (hit, sitting)
J
j - dʒ (just, large)
K
k - k (cat, back)
L
l - l (leg, little)
M
m - m (man, lemon)
N
n - n (no, ten)
*ng - ŋ (sing, finger)
O - oʊ (go, home)
*OE - ɔɪ (boy, join)
o - ɑ: (arm, father) ɒ (hot, rock) ɔ: (call, far)
*or- ɑʳ (arm=orm, car=kor)
P
p - p (pet, map)
Q
q - tʃ (check, church)
R
r - r (red, try), ɜ:ʳ (turn, learn)
S
s - s (sun, miss)
T
t - t (tea, getting)
U - u: (blue, food)
*Ur - ʊəʳ (pure, tourist)
u - ʌ (cup, luck)
V
v - v (voice, five)
W - ʊ (put, could)
w - w (wet, window)
X
x - ʃ (she, crash)
Y
y - j (yes, yellow)
Z - ʒ (pleasure, vision)
z - z (zoo, lazy)
Il XplAn and dEl wic cu problems lAtr...
<<< left your alphabet in the dust
"rIt, and sO imajin haO kwiklE sumwun kin lrn tU rEd and rIt wic a fyU mOr qAnjez? "
It is much slower for someone who knows the old system. That is why it will never happen, ironically nobody will accept it.
A second reason is the fact you make it more complicated although faster to write. Combinations of sounds are better left to as many characters as possible so kids can learn to pronounce them. Its easier to learn tsjek then ceck cause a child will also learn how to pronounce it easier after learning t, s and j.
@xeno:
reminds me you never replied to my last post in the alphabet topic.
Im stil cinking cer nEdz tU B mOr qAnjez, lIk rEnAming cu letrs uv cE alfabet tU cu mOst komonlE yUzd saOndz.
I understood your opinion, but why is it your opinion?
edit: thx for the answer btw ![]()
I understood your opinion, but why is it your opinion?
edit: thx for the answer btw
wel, tAk cu nAmz uv cu letrs. if cu rUl iz cat yU sA cu nAm uv cu letr wen it iz kapitolIzd, it iz pritE yUsles tU hav a letr nAmd 'dubl-yU'. cu saOnd 'dubl-yU' wil nevr Okr in naqrol spEq, unles, uv cOrs, cu spEkr iz rEfring tU cu letr 'dubl-yU'.
if cu rUl iz gOing tU bE cat wE sA cu letr nAm wen a letr is kapitolIzd, it just mAks sens, cen, tU renAm cu letrs tU sumcing a litl mOr yUsfl can 'dubl-yU'. sO, cat iz Y I rEnAmd 'dubl-yU' tU 'ʊ' (az in pWt, kWd).
naO, just bI qAnjing a letr nAm, wE krEAt a nU vawl, wun wiq iz rEly kwIt nEded. naO wE kin spel 'put' and 'could' in a standrd, fOnetikalE sensibl wA - 'pWt', kWd'.
but cer R stil problems, wiq iz Y cer stil nEdz mOr dEvelupment uv cis sistm. xrlE, cO, it iz a betr sistm can wat wE krentlE hav.
wE stil hav cEz 8 problemz tU dEl wic:
*aO - aʊ (now, out) - wE xWd hav a seprit letr fOr cis (anucr nU vawl)
*c - θ (think, both), ð (this, mother) - wE xWd hav tU letrs, wun fOr θ and wun fOr ð, not yUz 'c' fOr bOc. fOr nao, cO, wE hav nO chOEs but tU yUz c fOr bOc, I supOz.
*Er - ɪəʳ (near, here) - cis iz a problem bEkoz 'er' iz a problem. sE bElO
*er - az uv naO, wE yUz 'er' fOr wrdz lIk 'air' or 'their' (er, cer) but wE kWd olsO spel cem wic 'Ar' if yU cink abaOt it: 'Ar' sez cu sAm cing az 'er'. cis iz confyUzing. sum sOrt uv qanj nEdz tU hapen hEr. konsidr hAo naO wE just yUz 'r' fOr 'er' (wrd, rEmembr). I cink cE 'R' saOndz R ol fukt up. wE xWd konsidr mAking nU letrs fOr 'R' sAondz.
*ng - ŋ (sing, finger) - nEd a letr fOr cis saOnd.
*OE - ɔɪ (boy, join) - sAm, nEd a letr fOr cis.
*or- ɑʳ (arm=orm, car=kor) - anucer fukt up R saOnd wE nEd tU dEl wic.
*Ur - ʊəʳ (pure, tourist) sAm, anucer 'R' sAond we nEd tU mAk a letr fOr.
if wE kin solv cEz problems, wE kin hav a sistm cat iz sensibl fOnetiklE, a sistm cat iz srtinlE mOr sensibl can wut wE presentlE hav.
wil yU help, litl pol?
cE ixU iz cat bEfOr wE kin strt cinking abaOt qAnjing cu nAmz uv cu letrs tU cu mOst komonlE yUzd saOndz, wE nEd tU hav letr nAmz fOr ol uv cu saOndz cat wE yUz. az it is nAo, wE hav menE saOndz cat Rnt reprEzentd bI letrs. frst wE nEd tU fiks cis problem. cen wE kin qAnj letr nAmz tU reprEzent cu mOst komon saOndz.
plEz help, litl pol
sO, R U sErius abaOt fiksing cE alafabet, litl pol?
yes, otherwise I would have replied already. I will address the subjects when I have more time, srry for the delay. RL is consuming me.
X marks the spot, not k!
X-men cannot be S-men or K-men!
I am exasperated over your attempts to x out the x!
Imperial Forum → Politics → The letter C
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.