Re: PW 77 setup

just an oddball idea i'll throw out there for no good reason other than to make people whine more wink

i have been saying merge the gals together (for lack of players) for awhile, but then again i remember the days when there were 30 fams of 20 people in 3-4 galaxies.

if a merge does happen why not merge MW into PW instead of the other way around like it is usually suggested? tongue

Important principles may, and must, be inflexible.
Abraham Lincoln

Re: PW 77 setup

Indeed, these are all issues we face because of lack of players.  Else we'd all be happier tongue

Trust me, Mods/Devs are actively trying to help with this.  Even Stefan is on board again!

103

Re: PW 77 setup

Nah please dont open a new round, people would lose interest in this, I just need some more days, people is kollaborating a lot and the lists are ezpekted to be ready tomorrow. So staurday we'll start applikations.

The prozess itself is fun enuf to keep players entertained, and in the meanwhile you kan run another round of MW or Orion or whateva but not PW please.

104

Re: PW 77 setup

Lee wrote:

Render this aint going to happen, not enough time.

Ur better off doing a short round whilst getting this set up officially imo.

Kmon buddy stop being negative and apply wink
We'll be starting the round nezt wednesday, or thursday as muzh late.

105 (edited by Lee 28-Mar-2013 16:45:44)

Re: PW 77 setup

yeh put me down as leader.

im not saying its a bad idea, its very good, its just going to take time to organize and implement, but gj man gj.

Also Render the mods are talking about opening one of the old galaxys for a chaos round, all can join, full random, 4 weeks. sounds fun for now tongue

106

Re: PW 77 setup

a kaos round, 2 weeks and insane starting rezz, that would be right imo, my steup will be ready for nezt wednesday, or I kan delay it a bit more, but 4 weeks on another stuff people will lose the interest in this.

Re: PW 77 setup

Render wrote:

Nah please dont open a new round, people would lose interest in this, I just need some more days, people is kollaborating a lot and the lists are ezpekted to be ready tomorrow. So staurday we'll start applikations.

The prozess itself is fun enuf to keep players entertained, and in the meanwhile you kan run another round of MW or Orion or whateva but not PW please.


My fear also. See you later wink

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

108

Re: PW 77 setup

sigh...

Re: PW 77 setup

All we asked for was linked in HQ for 24hrs... Then got reset before then, v\mode time. wink

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

110 (edited by Poley 29-Mar-2013 07:09:46)

Re: PW 77 setup

Leave it to mods to [] one of the better ideas up.  I mean when was tje last time you guys saw the community so positive about a fresh idea?

111 (edited by MotherJedi 29-Mar-2013 04:19:58)

Re: PW 77 setup

dont give up render. its a good idea worth doing at least once. this tri thing is to keep people logging in and therefore will keep this idea alive

I believe in angels and unicorns

Re: PW 77 setup

Renders idea ftw. I'll be around to lead a fam

DH (ave/\/\an

Re: PW 77 setup

Player

~ Cloud

"I Cannot Awake From This Nightmare As Long As You Exist..."

Re: PW 77 setup

cmon, lets go render. you have more names to add to the list smile

I believe in angels and unicorns

Re: PW 77 setup

I'm still here, just in v/mode till it starts. wink

~*✠ ]PW[ Forever ✠*~

Re: PW 77 setup

Render put your adress down i will buy you a cheapo keyboard. Ffs man....

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: PW 77 setup

After some embarrassing defeats, of late, I would rather keep things player. My own count makes that 2 defeats ever. Me and Tobias can squabble in the chicken penn in the past yeara future. smile

One life to live in is all that a person needs. When traveling down a road looking for the ascension to greater things, all that really matters is the way you got to the end, when you reach your final destination did you help or hurt more?

Re: PW 77 setup

remember some players dont use the forums smile.

we need this back up as galactic news in tri smile

/me cheers on render
this is gunna be awesome

Been dreaming, I've been waiting, To fly with those brave ponies
The Wonderbolts, their daring tricks, Spinning 'round and having kicks
Perform for crowds of thousands, They'll shower us with diamonds
The Wonderbolts will see me right here at the Gala!

119

Re: PW 77 setup

thank you gals and guys smile  I keep on kounting

120 (edited by MotherJedi 29-Mar-2013 13:54:27)

Re: PW 77 setup

MotherJedi wrote:

4. i'm not sure if torq is playing devils advocate or not but no matter what way you put it, you were planning to merge the 2 galaxies and probably with this bug, now was going to be the golden opportunity to do this since both galaxies are going to be shut down at the same time. and i'm pretty sure you're missing the point with pw players protests. its really not so much about the pw identity as it is about the different styles of play between the 2 galaxies. if pw players wanted to play mw then they would do so and vice versa. and while we still have 79 people in pw, its not a dead duck yet.

"Yes, I am to an extent.  First of all, I don't "plan" anything.  I suggest.  It's not in my authority to plan and make changes of this nature.  In any case, everyone knows theres differences in playstyle between PW and MW, noone argues with this either..  The same is true For Andromeda and Triangulum.   However, as a Dev, I see it as my job to look at the bigger picture here.  I try to think on what's good for the overall game.  Can I always be right?  No, ofcourse not.  I just share my opinion and why I think so.  And this is one of those things.  With specific regards to PW players, ofcourse they'll have this resentment of merging.  If there were only 10 players left in IC, 5 from PW 5 from MW, they STILL wouldn't want to merge and would rather continue playing their own playstyles.  Is this necessarily the best way forward? No, personally, I don't think so."


i'm sorry Torq but i really have to take issue with you here. it seems that maybe you still dont understand. you say as a dev its your job to look at the bigger picture which its obvious to me that you're not at all. and you also claim that pw players have a resentment of merging which is also incorrect.
there is no resentment. what there is tho is a passionate response to a 'bigger picture' being forced (it seems) onto them. and where is the bigger picture when you lump everyone into the same place? having the 2 galaxies provides people with good choices to suit their circumstances at the time. mw is obviously a galaxy for real hc players who like to have their fun a bit more intensely than those that prefer pw with shorter rounds, smaller families and a lighter atmosphere.
yes we have been losing players but we still have a reasonable and playable core player base for both galaxies. there's a silly saying that goes 'if it aint broke then dont fix it'. well ic aint broke yet, just a bit dented. to attract more players, one of the things we'll need is a bit of variety.
us players can see that, which is a good part of the reason why we fight so hard to keep pw. not thru resentment but for survival

I believe in angels and unicorns

Re: PW 77 setup

I don't disagree with you at all. Variety is definitely what we need.

Our overall aim is to get IC back and beyond what it was in terms of playerbase. That'd be ideal. Then it gives us so many options to do so many things. Right now though, I believe it's a luxury we can't afford.

By your logic we may as well have Pinwheel and Milk Way and Andromeda and Triangulum all going right now. Don't you think each of those galaxies have their own identities too? I certainly do.

But then where would that leave the 160 odd players that we have? 40 per gal?

Re: PW 77 setup

Well if you want to have different types ie ss hardcore, ss normal etc then have different gals for those & let people play all they want. Then if you want to play mw & pw (normal fam gals) restrict that to VIP

If people complain about past names being used for them, rename them

<&Parrot> kangaroos are sexy though
<&Parrot> look at them legs

123 (edited by MotherJedi 29-Mar-2013 16:14:31)

Re: PW 77 setup

oh now you're being silly torq. on one hand you say merge pw and mw and on the other hand you say we need variety. which is it?
i never once mentioned the other two as we haven't had tri and andro for a while now and we obviously dont have enough people playing to have another 2 galaxies - i may be old but i'm not stupid.
what we do have is pw and mw. two very different galaxies with emphasis on 2 different ways of playing. it is easier to recruit new players if they know they're not going to get thrown straight into the deep end. and since we no longer have virgo it now means that pw is the perfect place for guidance and instruction for those that wish it.
for a bigger variety we have plenty to keep us busy with the competition galaxies.
having one galaxy for all will always favour the more hardcore players and will eventually shut out those who enjoy the not so serious side.
my logic is sound and you know it

I believe in angels and unicorns

Re: PW 77 setup

Lets see, I say we need variety, but also say t's a luxury we can't afford right now - so you call me silly?

Then you say you say we don't have enough players for the other two galaxies, Andro and Tri, so you're okay with not having them going.  Yet it's a requirement to always have PW going?

And then lets add to the fact that you say it's good for newer players to come into Pinwheel, where you can help guide and instruct them, yet Render has said that if his idea goes through, any new players might have to go to Milky Way?

Yep, your logic is sound indeed.

Re: PW 77 setup

quit twisting my words around to suit your own purposes. you seem to be hell bent on making a mockery and if it wasn't 430am i'd say more so i'll save this little rebuttal til the morning. are you sure you're on the side of IC at all???? i'm starting to wonder....

I believe in angels and unicorns