Topic: I challenge Primo! Pascals Triangle.
Primo seems to be of the opinion Pascals triangle cannot be used to calculate odds.
This fundemental challenge to a math law awes me. If he can prove his theorem I will pay him $3500 USD and half my salary for the rest of the year.
Additionally I will nominate him for a nobel prize in math (comes with a $1,000,000 prize) and a Feilds award in math (comes with a $2,000,000 prize)
First a primer on the current established LAWS of probabilities http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/jo/probability/info.htm
This is evidence of usage in GMat questions http://www.beatthegmat.com/coin-flip-qu … 17911.html
Pascals Triangle has a wiki http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_triangle
Then the Wolfram breakdown: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PascalsTriangle.html
Now Primo....
I said simply, in math terms the following:
Pascals Triangle where binary results can be studied
1 - 1
1 - 2 - 1
1 -3 - 3 -1This continues
Now if 0 is .75 and 1 is .25 and 0 is left and 1 right
3 games is this
(.75^3) - (.25*.75*.75) - (.25 * .25 * .75) - (.25^3)
This would stand for townie 3 times in a row, 2 times of 3, 1 out of 3, mafia 3 times in a row.
Basic binary math, aka odds calculating, says Torqez had a 23.73946875% to be a townie 5 times in a row and a 17.79785156% chance to be a townie again a 6th time. This is not insurmountable odds, but does weigh against him.
If you, or anyone else, can prove Pascal's Triangle to be false, please do so!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)