Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Tobes wrote:

stop whining.

war's happening.

no more bullshit posts. its going to be fun.


there. another napbreaker from Lees fam. thought better of u tobes.

so far we have

Lee
Cumsville
Tobes

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

dRaGoNsUP wrote:
Tobes wrote:

stop whining.

war's happening.

no more bullshit posts. its going to be fun.


there. another napbreaker from Lees fam. thought better of u tobes.

so far we have

Lee
Cumsville
Tobes

Aw man Tobes really? I really had a higher expectation from you =-\

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

same! 2 wars.

I like how u dodge what im saying, about the harassment and just general horribleness of ur families?

Il tell you what this is a 1 time offer.

All of ur family come and apologize to me on irc and post them in a "sorry" thread and il re-instate the nap and we re-sign with a cancellation date.

but your not guna do that, because ur all children with the mental age of 4?


whaha our ungrowed shild is talking poop your a nap breaker  lee never kept your word so deffendly not undersrand why people makes agreements with you  you have a memory like a goldfish

~~~~******EasYwaY ******~~~~ biggest noob around

104 (edited by Flash[light]ning 15-Mar-2013 17:53:36)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

wow, 5 pages in 4 and a half hours? IC must not be dying.

you guys can call lee a nap breaker all you like ( i don't know the full situation).

but all these attacks, personal ones, name calling and harassment should have you all forum banned. you call it 'trolling' but really you are attacking a player on a personal level making yourselves look like children.

telling people to 'burn in a fire' and 'kill themselves' is utterly shameful. if mods don't close/delete this thread then it looks worst on them.

disclaimer: not saying lee is in the right whatsoever, but realistically its a GAME, leave personal attacks out of it and grow the [bumlickingpoodle] up.


edit:


2. No harassment
Harassment is not necessarily limited to the type of language used, but the intent. This includes both clear and implied language that refers to violence in any capacity that is not directly related to the game. This further includes the distribution, release or discussion of any real-life, personal, or private information both real life and game related about other players or moderators of Imperial Conflict. For example, posting phone numbers, home addresses, planet lists, battle reports, family forum content etc. is not allowed. Repeatedly targeting a specific player or persons with harassment will lead to further action.


http://imperialconflict.com/explain.php … orum_rules <-- go read. You are upset but its not acceptable.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

guys im that much of an air head i only realised we were at war about 10 mins ago

im now getting the facts from both sides and taking a fair view on it.

heres the score.

it was discussed the 14 day cancellation but nothing was oficially signed.

its not a clear nap break but it is a bit shady which is where the problem lies

either way unfortunately there has been a lot of bad blood between the fams and were at the point now where theres no return i feel.

im sorry its worked out this way but 70/80 both have much more savings over my fam (84) and its not like you dont have savings. you have more savings than my fam

so dispite all the arguments the fams involved have equal savings so it will be a fair fight.

im not happy with how it came about however we are in a circumstance where we are going to war.

salutes

tobias

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Meh I have been trying to have your back Lee... because I think Pie and others have been really harsh on you for paying for planets for the nap earlier ... but you are making it very difficult.

I imagine if I were in your fam or allies and see you posting in uni that the reason you are breaking a nap/word 10 days early because you personally were offended by a couple people trolling you.

Then you offer to re-nap with the original agreed date if those that trolled YOU come and personally apologize to YOU.

To me this sounds like someone with an awful ego problem... I know it is hard to look at yourself objectively but I hope you do see it too.  We all have problems, yours just seems to be your ego... you are willing to drag the names of your fam members and allies through the mud for personal pride ... this is not right and not the quality of a leader in a game or in life.

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Flash[light]ning wrote:

wow, 5 pages in 4 and a half hours? IC must not be dying.

you guys can call lee a nap breaker all you like ( i don't know the full situation).

but all these attacks, personal ones, name calling and harassment should have you all forum banned. you call it 'trolling' but really you are attacking a player on a personal level making yourselves look like children.

telling people to 'burn in a fire' and 'kill themselves' is utterly shameful. if mods don't close/delete this thread then it looks worst on them.

disclaimer: not saying lee is in the right whatsoever, but realistically its a GAME, leave personal attacks out of it and grow the [bumlickingpoodle] up.


edit:


2. No harassment
Harassment is not necessarily limited to the type of language used, but the intent. This includes both clear and implied language that refers to violence in any capacity that is not directly related to the game. This further includes the distribution, release or discussion of any real-life, personal, or private information both real life and game related about other players or moderators of Imperial Conflict. For example, posting phone numbers, home addresses, planet lists, battle reports, family forum content etc. is not allowed. Repeatedly targeting a specific player or persons with harassment will lead to further action.


http://imperialconflict.com/explain.php … orum_rules <-- go read. You are upset but its not acceptable.

Damn what a game. You can have months of hard work and preparation ruined by someone going back on an agreement and that person will have zero consequences, but if someone calls you a bad name (in a war game, on the internet) you can get forum banned. Awesome.

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:

Meh I have been trying to have your back Lee... because I think Pie and others have been really harsh on you for paying for planets for the nap earlier ... but you are making it very difficult.

I imagine if I were in your fam or allies and see you posting in uni that the reason you are breaking a nap/word 10 days early because you personally were offended by a couple people trolling you.

Then you offer to re-nap with the original agreed date if those that trolled YOU come and personally apologize to YOU.

To me this sounds like someone with an awful ego problem... I know it is hard to look at yourself objectively but I hope you do see it too.  We all have problems, yours just seems to be your ego... you are willing to drag the names of your fam members and allies through the mud for personal pride ... this is not right and not the quality of a leader in a game or in life.

Lee I am sorry, none of my comments before this thread were meant to be taken seriously. I still think you had this planned and are just using that as an excuse, but if you're being serious know that I never meant to offend (before this thread, I meant to offend in this thread).

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Ya chomp has been harsh ... think he just spends too much time on 4 chan is all tongue

Never rule out the possibility that you are a complete idiot

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Chomp i know the feeling. we've all had it done. maybe we should figure a way out to deal with it via the game and a game function that stops it from happening.

from what i have read, the nap has been made with exploitable loopholes. unfortunately people will exploit them, you got to make sure of a more water tight nap. that talk between WS and Lee doesn't look to be 'official'.

so its shameful on lee's part, but if he acts that way the only thing you can do is show everyone what he is like.

one thing im certain of, if we all spoke like proper human beings (when were being nice humans ofc) to each other more in IC (instead of trolling) then these problems would be sorted by talking it over, rather than 5 pages of crude slander. people dont realise how things are interpreted via text. the way you type it and put it down isn't the same as someone else may read it. (especially with different langauges etc involved).

i'd try to get the four leaders together to sort something out. maybe talking to lee like an adult will make him prefer to do this a better way.

111 (edited by Chomp_On_This 15-Mar-2013 18:08:27)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee tell me which comment made you break the nap on us:

Chomp_On_This wrote:
Lee wrote:
WS IC Legend wrote:

the update for the PvC for the win is simply this

Final week of the round the 2 best alliances will fight for the win smile

sorry 78/84 but you will not make it that far smile

Rank      Family      Planets      Networth      Score
1    Look how pretty Pickle is! (7870) [20,32]                    1807   
4    Dead Man Dead Presidents hehe (7880) [17,10]    1633       

2    Birdsss (7881) [67,5]                                            1805   
3    Favorite Day of the Week? (7872) [21,84]            1663


bahaha becuase u have more planets does not mean you are "better"

78/84 kill you in econ, so when i take ur planets off you and make you a bit lighter, u can re-post a statement smile

Oh hey look, it's the excuse the second place family makes EVERY SINGLE ROUND.

Chomp_On_This wrote:

7    Censor This! (7878) [98,76]    1380    32067796    83342


LOL YOU ARE EVEN LOWER THAN YOUR ALLIES HOLY CRAP THAT'S EMBARRASSING HAVE FUN GETTING MORE PLANETS WITH ZERO TARGETS AND EXPO PHASE ENDING TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Chomp_On_This wrote:
dfsf wrote:

lol We'll beat you with ease just as 72/81 would do if they warred you.  You killed your fam when you caused Torqez to leave. He was the brains in your fam.


+1. You are nothing without Torq.

Chomp_On_This wrote:
Lee wrote:

Meow!

put ur claws away

Torq is decent, but he aint the best. I can attack perfectly fine bewteen me and aw and allies but i guess you will see wont you CHOMP. wink


Looking forward to it.

Chomp_On_This wrote:
LEGEND wrote:

Pre war trash talk is always better then the war itself CS tongue


Lmao ain't that the sad truth tongue

Chomp_On_This wrote:
dfsf wrote:

Aww you are that afraid of Chomp that you needed to PNAP your biggest threat to make sure you had the eco backing to fight us...Really sad when the bigger families are afraid to fight and risk a little eco growth loss to fight again later.


He SHOULD be AFRAID OF MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE X(

Chomp_On_This wrote:

CHOMP ON THIS CHUMP!@!!!!11s

Where were the personal attacks? I said you were nothing without Torq, and told the whole thread to 'chomp on this chump.' This is what made you break the nap on us? REALLY?!

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

yer 70/80 can pay planets to re sign nap.

the personal abuse isnt fair. ive made that mistake myself so i cant bitch

2009-11-11               Networth rank 9 - Champions Capri
2010-03-24               Networth rank 3 - Champions MW
2010-10-26               Networth rank 4 - fail king
2010-09-17               Size rank 5 - Champins SD
2011-04-06               Size rank 2 - champions MW

113 (edited by Chomp_On_This 15-Mar-2013 18:19:08)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Flash[light]ning wrote:

Chomp i know the feeling. we've all had it done. maybe we should figure a way out to deal with it via the game and a game function that stops it from happening.

from what i have read, the nap has been made with exploitable loopholes. unfortunately people will exploit them, you got to make sure of a more water tight nap. that talk between WS and Lee doesn't look to be 'official'.

so its shameful on lee's part, but if he acts that way the only thing you can do is show everyone what he is like.

one thing im certain of, if we all spoke like proper human beings (when were being nice humans ofc) to each other more in IC (instead of trolling) then these problems would be sorted by talking it over, rather than 5 pages of crude slander. people dont realise how things are interpreted via text. the way you type it and put it down isn't the same as someone else may read it. (especially with different langauges etc involved).

i'd try to get the four leaders together to sort something out. maybe talking to lee like an adult will make him prefer to do this a better way.

Good post, you make solid points. Personally, having someone do this to me ingame after putting a month and a half of hard work into the round, is a much worse offense than any name calling or trolling. I could care less if someone rages at me on the internet, I am used to it. But having someone personally ruin your round by going back on what they agreed upon just makes me super upset =-\

And when I get upset, I lash out at those who upset me. I apologize for my behavior ;_;

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Tobes wrote:

yer 70/80 can pay planets to re sign nap.

the personal abuse isnt fair. ive made that mistake myself so i cant bitch

pay to resign nap when u guys broke nap? ARE U SERIOUS?

115 (edited by Genesis 18-Mar-2013 01:30:14)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

this says it all for Lee

10:55:02: <Lee> Week 46, 7Send Another MessageSave
10:55:02: <Lee> 48h alliance Core Nap between 7878/7884 & 7880/7870
10:55:02: <Lee> - it will be a EOR war with the dates of cancellation settled when WS gets on
10:55:08: <Lee> u know we never did arrange a date
10:55:14: <Lee> we can use thast to our advantage tbh
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:40: Torqez shrugs

oh and those are QUOTES

You can cry all you want and HIDE behind the it wasnt signed in the nap itself but when 2 leaders send msg's agreeing to the dates thats all it should take.

and here is one thing you are leaving out.

DID YOU EVER "ASK" FOR IT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE NAP ITSELF?  NO
DID YOU EVER ADD IT TO THE NAP AND SEND IT TO ANY FAMS TO SIGN?  NO

THUS EVEN YOU THOUGHT IS WAS GOOD ENOUGH THE INGAME AGREEMENT SINCE YOU NEVER BOTHERED TO THINK YOU NEEDED IT TO BE SIGNED

AND YOU CAN GO [] YOURSELF IF YOU THINK WE ARE GOING TO SAY WE ARE SORRY FOR ANYTHING.

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

116

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

10:55:14: <Lee> we can use thast to our advantage tbh
10:55:37: <Lee> im just guna say anytime during the last 14 days nap can be cancelled
10:55:40: Torqez shrugs

yup thats exactly what it means, we was sticking to the 14 day option.

Look, you all may call me a nap breaker, but technically its not a nap break, there was no terms added to the nap thats a fact. I have gave you 48hrs notice to save, just lump it and move on.


but trust me you will not win haha

I have a BIG surprise waiting for you
Signed, WS IC Legend of Phil Robertson (#7880)

See Ws has the right idea, War talk, i like it. Grtz.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Wow, what drama!  Good or bad IC is definitely still kickin'.

Flash[light]ning wrote:

if mods don't close/delete this thread then it looks worst on them.

Well, we won't close the thread but we'll deal with the offending posts.  Regardless, you are correct.  Everybody, stop with the personal attacks.  All of you who are doing it.  We can and will issue forum bans when necessary, and this may or may not include the ability to post in your family forums as well.  So KNOCK IT OFF.

Tobes wrote:

so dispite all the arguments the fams involved have equal savings so it will be a fair fight.

I think the issue isn't the fairness of the actual fight but rather the context around it.

[PW2] PICKLE ARMY wrote:

Then you offer to re-nap with the original agreed date if those that trolled YOU come and personally apologize to YOU.

To me this sounds like someone with an awful ego problem... I know it is hard to look at yourself objectively but I hope you do see it too.  We all have problems, yours just seems to be your ego... you are willing to drag the names of your fam members and allies through the mud for personal pride ... this is not right and not the quality of a leader in a game or in life.

This is what I've been saying all along.  Lee I apologize if this is offensive and I'm not trying to slander you for the sake of slander but I think you are a terrible leader.  Pickle's post above is another example of what I mean about your ego.  You say your family is worthless without you, you talk about what jokes your allies are,  you say YOU are the ONLY reason your fam is #1, and when you can't be online for a war that means it can't happen as if you are the only important player in the alliance.  78/84 has become the Lee show, and it is unfortunate for anybody in those families.

Oxygen wrote:

We were pretty far behind for a while and our allies never gave up on us or belittled us (not that I know if anyways).  We made a comeback and now we're having a decent round.

This is why good allies isn't the same as good ranking allies.  I'll ally 7866 again over a fam lead by Lee any day.


The last thing I want to say is about responsibility.  As much as I hate to say it, this isn't entirely on Lee.  Was he sneaky?  Absolutely.  Is he untrustworthy?  Indeed.  However, he is also correct: if all the leaders involved didn't actually sign the terms in question then it is on those people for not following up to ensure the agreed upon terms.

That sucks, I know, and we're trying to fix the game so that these kinds of things are less possible.  Until then, leaders really need to take responsibility for their own agreements.  I think it is absolutely shitty what Lee is doing, and I think he is not to be trusted in the future as a result.  The fact that he's essentially saying "lol got ya on a technicality wink" speaks to his character, but this could have been prevented if such terms were clearly documented in an official NAP agreement.  If they weren't, then it's also the mistake of the leaders involved for putting trust on somebody who doesn't deserve such consideration.

Got a few bucks?  The Imperial Tip Jar is accepting contributions!

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Our relations with 7884 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 43 weeks.

Our relations with 7878 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 43 weeks.

43 weeks until 78/84 die once and for all this round

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

119 (edited by Genesis 18-Mar-2013 01:33:00)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Nope everything they said to me, i took personally which is what they wanted and this is the result of making me mad, il tell you if someone spoke to me like this guys have the past few days in RL, well they would be on the floor.

Now, All it took was apologies, but i dont even get that.

I offered to resign on the condition i got those apologies, which is more then fair IMO, but this was the result:

* You were kicked from #**** by WhiteShadow (WhiteShadow)

<Lee> but yeh nice way to derail diplo..pfft
<WhiteShadow> none to be given i didnt do anything to be sorry for
<Lee> not you
<WhiteShadow> well since i aint in chat much i have no idea what you mean but you said our fam and alliance
<Lee> tbh my plan was to cancel on 82/73 today
<Lee> until yesterday when ur fam started talking to me like a []
<WhiteShadow> well its us now
<Lee> infact its been like that for a few days now
<Lee> and i have had enough of it
<WhiteShadow> not me
<Lee> i dont expect to be spoken to like that
<Lee> no not you
<Lee> not all ur fam
<WhiteShadow> so anyway we just war
<Lee> but some
<WhiteShadow> im good with it
<WhiteShadow> lets not renap
<Lee> oki doke
<WhiteShadow> i have things figured out tongue

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

WS IC Legend wrote:

Our relations with 7884 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 43 weeks.

Our relations with 7878 have been broken. Attacks and offensive operations may resume in 43 weeks.

43 weeks until 78/84 die once and for all this round


WS be careful, don't wanna hurt Lee's feelings!!!

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

121 (edited by Genesis 18-Mar-2013 01:34:36)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

Lee wrote:

Nope everything they said to me, i took personally which is what they wanted and this is the result of making me mad, il tell you if someone spoke to me like this guys have the past few days in RL, well they would be on the floor.

Now, All it took was apologies, but i dont even get that.

I offered to resign on the condition i got those apologies, which is more then fair IMO, but this was the result:

* You were kicked from #**** by WhiteShadow (WhiteShadow)

<Lee> but yeh nice way to derail diplo..pfft
<WhiteShadow> none to be given i didnt do anything to be sorry for
<Lee> not you
<WhiteShadow> well since i aint in chat much i have no idea what you mean but you said our fam and alliance
<Lee> tbh my plan was to cancel on 82/73 today
<Lee> until yesterday when ur fam started talking to me like a POS
<WhiteShadow> well its us now
<Lee> infact its been like that for a few days now
<Lee> and i have had enough of it
<WhiteShadow> not me
<Lee> i dont expect to be spoken to like that
<Lee> no not you
<Lee> not all ur fam
<WhiteShadow> so anyway we just war
<Lee> but some
<WhiteShadow> im good with it
<WhiteShadow> lets not renap
<Lee> oki doke
<WhiteShadow> i have things figured out tongue

Look at this internet tough guy lmao! [trolling]

Obsessed is a word the lazy use to describe the dedicated.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

That's your issue Lee - YOU took the trolling personally, while they were just having fun with you.  Pie is completely right when he says this is an issue of ego - you see that you're #1 in the game but you're not being "respected", so you want to show everyone what true power is.  The problem is that if you kicked our ass in 12 days, I would have been perfectly fine with it.  This will be a hollow win, though, because you went about this the wrong way.  You let the troll get into your head and it cost you a credible fam victory this round.

123 (edited by I like pie 15-Mar-2013 19:36:19)

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

It is going to be so damn amazing like having sex with 69 virgins when Lee see's what happens to him smile

He will never see the [variety of herbs] coming towards his [frittata] haha

I am the flail of God. Had you not created great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you.

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

it would be highly embrassing to see him lose a war he cheated and picked with lol

Confront them with annihilation, and they will then survive; plunge them into a deadly situation, and they will then live. When people fall into danger, they are then able to strive for victory.

Sun Tzu

Re: 78 & 84 vs 82 & 73 + 70 & 80 (MW)

I never thought I'd say this.....but I agree with Lee.

The NAP msg is clear, there are no terms in it about a cancellation time.

If you add a gentlemens agreement too an existing nap, with the before mentioned shady person without resigning it in an official nap, the only one you can blame for the breaking of a gentlemen agreement is yourself.

If you have the time to make it on IRC, it takes 30 seconds too copy-paste/add it to the existing nap and msg it around the alliance and (re)sign it.

If you burn your bum, you gotta sit on the blisters. Now start planning how you can whoop his bum! =P

Immigrants make a difference
We are all immigrants
We all make a difference
How are we all immigrants?
- Our souls are not from here