126 (edited by Paininside 05-Aug-2012 13:52:50)

Re: Is this what IC is?

35% is crap, up it to 70% then top fams in eco cannot rape fam after fam, they also wont want to have more then 1 popper cuz of this reason, this keeps them fams more in check growth wize.

else theil be bored out of their asses being big but stayin small on size, this wil force fams more to fight fams in their own strenght, giving more competition.
and if they dont, they give other fams the chance to grow back to their own eco due to lack of planets.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

Re: Is this what IC is?

> Render wrote:

> uhm you mean redesign to 40% or 45% Shadow, I cannot see how you avoid more farming by increasing the # of fams in farming range hmm

yes you are right

tongue

[Pw9]Shadow

128

Re: Is this what IC is?

> Paininside wrote:

> 35% is crap, up it to 70% then top fams in eco cannot rape fam after fam, they also wont want to have more then 1 popper cuz of this reason, this keeps them fams more in check growth wize.

else theil be bored out of their asses being big but stayin small on size, this wil force fams more to fight fams in their own strenght, giving more competition.
and if they dont, they give other fams the chance to grow back to their own eco due to lack of planets.



that is like when you have a soup lacking salt and then you add 2 hands of salt, no way 70% can be a solution.

We have a limit that is slightly inefficient, up it to 40% and taste it, then if we need more salt up it to 45% and taste it, right? smile

Re: Is this what IC is?

no, then u might aswell start at 70 and work your way down, so u realy wanna see the impact such rule have, then start on the hard stuff.
top fams wil stil remain top fams, they wil simply change their way of play. but we will get more fair fighting.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

130

Re: Is this what IC is?

so you rather start from the unknown and farther point than start testing with the next step, how reversed is your mind lol, changing from black to white in a quickshot has never been the solution to any human issue, there's a greys scale did u hear about it?

Re: Is this what IC is?

the killing of the dino's
1915 the Lusitania
The Arab Spring

and manny manny others, the last one is stil in its working, but the others worked out pritty fine for us in the end.

Colorado: even in the 11/01 war i made more hits.
Colorado: 447 blow jobs.
Big Gary:  Only a fool cannot admit when he's wrong...
AW:    i love rim jobs
RisingDown: I know you do

132

Re: Is this what IC is?

hmm I'm not 100% sure the dinos were killed hmm  *looks at Flint

Re: Is this what IC is?

Why don't we just have 2 large families, or 4 large families in total and no one can complain about farming. Not everyone wins size, we all start out with 1 planet. Or maybe just build more lasers and portals next time instead of exploring more planets than you can hold.

I don't know what's "accepted" in a "normal galaxy". If people want to play Imperial Infra, then maybe change it so that each attacks takes a lot more morale than whatever the formula is right now now.

If making attacks can hurt someone's feelings, you might as well remove the attack function.

Or if you want families to be relatively even, you can just make each tick be 2 hours instead of 1. I'm sure most fams pull ahead because they are most active and can login and spend each hour's worth of stuff every hour. Or trigger attacks and send more fleets out each hour.

Re: Is this what IC is?

holy hell Valenka you still play? tongue

havent seen that name in a long time

Solis - #7872

Re: Is this what IC is?

No, haven't been here in months/years? Just thought I drop by and see what's happening around IC.

Re: Is this what IC is?

Ah, didn't think you were tongue Last time I seen your name we were always trying to conquer each other tongue

Solis - #7872