BeoWolfe,
Yes, the Tea Party is rooted in Libertarian, not "conservative," principles. Their focus is on the Constitution and fiscal sanity, not bedroom and world policing.
I can't disagree that Libertarians tend to take more conservative than liberal votes (away from people who don't deserve them anyway). But there are certainly a significant number of more liberal minded people who vote Libertarian--as opposed to liberal--in just the same way. I don't have any numbers on the percentages, nor do I disagree it's probably more people would choose conservatives as the "lesser evil" given the choice of conservative or liberal. But they do exist.
Edit: They don't "take" conservative nor liberal votes. I worded that poorly. I just meant what I said in the second half of the above: Many libertarians see conservatives as the lesser of the two evils. They vote Libertarian because it best fits their views and values; and surely more would if they weren't sure, before most elections started, that the only feasible outcomes were Republicrat varieties. But many (not trying to argue a majority) also choose liberalism as the lesser of the two evils, because they take bigger issue with the bedroom policing and warmongering of conservatives vs the oversized nanny government of liberals. (In practice, of course, liberals are good warmongerers too--but they tend to give more lip service to not killing everyone and our kids)
Einstein,
Thanks for making up numbers. You always convince us that you're smart and educated when you make stuff up!
Yes, the majority is always right. Republicans and "conservatives" are so smart! There's more Republicans than Libertarians, so Republicans have better ideas. Just like there's more Communists than Libertarians, so Communists have better ideas. Thanks for enlightening us. Appeals to majorities aren't just fallacious reasoning when arguing/backing up your position, they're also a staple Einstein reasoning tool!
[I wish I could obey forum rules]