Login is disabled. This forum is read-only.
Imperial Forum → Politics → The Constitutionality of the Mandate
"The Federal Government will pay for costs, to a level, for the lowest 5% in income in the US, and half costs for the lowest 10%."
now were getting mighty close to the same bill now arent we? 
that would make costs sky rocket just like they are now lol and though i do have socialist ideas, i do realize that most people are capable of bettering thier living conditions but choose not to. i simply want to help the ones that arent in this situation
Close to Obama's bill? Not remotely.
Its like saying... the flea (idk if correct or not, just an example) has 4 legs, an elephant has four legs, therefore they must be similar!
shhh!! im trying to scare him into thinkin hes a socialist 
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/03/27/toobin-train-wreck-for-the-obama-administration-today-on-individual-mandate/
Powerful stuff... a LOT of liberal talking heads are changing their view that Obamacare will make it.
The key comment of the day from Chief Justice Roberts:
"Can you create commerce so you can regulate it?"
Moving my odds of the end of ObamaCare to 90%
I'm glad that, even with the new racist hispanic woman and the lesbian (not that there's anything wrong with that), the Supreme Court isn't yet too horrible at basic reading skills. (from what it appears. fingers crossed.)
funny how the Supreme Court keeps talking like the Tea Party
For the record, if the health care bill goes down, I'd like to request everyone who claimed there was a liberal bias in the judicial system come out and apologize.
Liberal sites seem convinced they lost.
The talk is now 'expanding medicare' and 'single payer' and complaints that they may not see universal healthcare in their time now.
In other news I am grinning 
Zarf BeebleBrix, by no means would the mandate being ruled unconstitutional be evidence against a liberal bias.
The healthcare law overreaches what the law allows by so much that some of them can't pretend it's legal, even if their general political ideology might support the law. Even some liberals have some values. Professional integrity, personal integrity, the ability to read... Whatever they might have which causes them to overturn the law, it's not necessarily evidence that they're not liberally biased, generally speaking.
Uh oh... I smell a challenge
Zarf time for you two to debate!
There's also the possibility that they're just asking tough questions to appear to have given the issue critical thought, when they intend to allow this gross violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.
Not particularly likely, but backlash has been buffered against by this sort of thing before. I couldn't tell you by who or when, but it's what the talking heads said. Again, not particularly likely, but it's possible.
While I do not give credit to the liberal ones, the other Supremes are supposedly fairly intelligent, and they should read the news. It should be clear ObamaCare will bankrupt the nation, so they should be willing to strike it down if they can find cause to do so.
Hell a Tibetan Monk who has not been seen or been in contact with society for 70 years during his meditations could have made a better bill!
The one part I read that I love... if they do peicemeal it, the Cornhusker Kickback seems to be in the spotlight 
What a mess. I want to run for office. My slogan will be "burn it to the ground," and I'll make the campaign promises to execute anyone who doesn't evacuate a burning DC.
Sounds extreme. But I think I'm serious. And I'm positive it'd be good for America.
if the supreme court throws out the law or even just the mandate it is a rebuke of the lower courts that said 4:1 that it was legal, so, i'd say taht's some bias
Oh yeah, and there's that. Thanks for actually backing up my previous statements with factual facty things.
<sinister music>
V. Kemp SAYS he wants to execute anyone who doesn't evacuate a burning DC
<audio clip> "I'll make the campaign promises to execute anyone who doesn't evacuate a burning DC"
But V. Kemp voted 57 times to spare the lives of squirrels in the road
And his own campaign takes money from DC residents
The New York Times said "We never even heard of V Kemp, and that's not just cause we suck at research"
<sinister music>
V Kemp. Wrong for the job. Wrong for America.
"I'm Ron Paul and I'll deny all knowledge of this message"
I'm laughing my ass off, but we all know that's verbatim what's going to happen in my future.
Kemp saves squirrels because they eat nuts. They positively devour nuts *soft music starts, patriotic* and Washington is filled with these nuts called administrators, staffers and politicians.
*Kemp fades in and starts talking* Destroying those nuts is important, but a meteor just won't happen, and plagues take to long. What I am proposing is to roast those nuts on an open fire and sometimes crack a hard shelled nut with a bit of fast moving metal.
Now my opponent claims I get my money from DC, and he got it a bit wrong. See DC Comics is my sole campaign provider with their PAC.
And as for name recognition the DC Tribune said "The end is coming, Kemp will win in a landslide!" I think this means they know something.
I am Kemp, and I approve this message!
*Paid for by DC PAC*
hahaha. Paragraph 2 was just win.
I believe that men must take bold action now. Because a meteor won't just happen! And plagues take too long!
Yes I can get you elected, as Ron Balsz has no message worthy to fight us with!
Who's Ron? Chris's evil brother? I'm getting brilliant script ideas!
Unfortunately, because they're brilliant, nobody will ever want to make them because the only thing that can make money today is fart jokes and pregnant 14 year olds crying that IT'S NOT FAIR and that dealing with the consequences of our own actions is just bullshit.
Ron Paul and Chris Balsz = Ron Balsz.
It even rhymes! Sorta
So the fight is on!
Still of ICBM
Military announcer: 10...9...8...7...6...5...
Cut to girl with flower
Girl: 6...7...8...9...10!
Black screen
Narrator: V Kemp talks big but he's just a sissy girl. Ron Balsz will be as the Scourge of God upon the unrighteous. Ron Balsz will rebuild the Real America in a limestone cavern safe below the radioactive desert he will forge of our biosphere.
"I'm Ron Paul and I'm the Bizarro-Dubya"
Ron Balsz *screen flickers with a colored picture of Ron Balsz, followed closely with white and black flashes* lied about Kemps finances
'Picture shifts to Ron Balsz with his finger in the air pointing at the sky* Ron Balsz lied about *picture of graves* his hippocratic oath.
*picture of a nice looking family* and Ron Balsz is lying about your family being invited to his underworld retreat. *picture catches fire and burns from the center to outside*
*Kemp comes into view* I don't want to kill you, just the rabies infested people of Washington.
And you know who is in that crowd? Ron Balsz, a long time Washington freak show, and he plans to save the other freaks of Washington and laugh as we lose everything.
Look I can bring the napalm if you bring the white phosphorous. Together we can burn baby burn.
Imperial Forum → Politics → The Constitutionality of the Mandate
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.