Topic: Spectrum thoughts
I was thinking just now. Television signals have been digitalized. The roll out, while some pain existed, was not to harsh over-all.
But there is a segment that is suffering really badly due to lack of spectrum. That would be wireless communications (both cellular and wifi).
The television bands are very bulky, but usually not a lot of saturation is happening. There is a lot of so called dead space in between channels.
In Portland an example... 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13, 22, 34, 50, 72 (the last few are guesses, I have not had tv without cable in a decade)
But digital signals allow us some room. A tv can be made to think a signal from 72 is really coming from 15, and 50 from 17...
The only real problem is it would require a hardware fix for each tower.
However as seen by cellular growth tower changes can be done relatively quick... and they might even foot the bill to get access to more range.
Given that we have potential to dramatically increase cellular bandwidth in many regions.
Of course a new 'adapter' would be required. So this would be a political hot potatoe, but it is a true potential increase that is very badly needed.
Think how much cellular companies are complaining about lack of bandwidth, and how AT&T is even throttling customers after a few Gigabytes (the grandfathered plans).
We could even mandate that half the bandwidth be sold to companies entering the cellular broadcast market (such as Cricket, US Cellular, and such) to further keep prices competative.
Sigh, I need to make Portland... want more sleep, but I really need to push.
Sorry YouFool this post requires no research so this is why I made it.
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)