Topic: Campaign Issue: Fishing
I am going to buy two Salmon. I will have them placed in blocks of ice.
I will remove the fins from them both prior to this.
I will never keep track of which Salmon is which.
These Salmon will both be fished from the same river. They will be the same type of Salmon, e.g. Chinook.
I will ask the audience why these two fish are considered different species.
I will demonstrate that genetically they are the same. I will demonstrate that their diets and migratory patterns are similar. I will demonstrate that essentially they are the same.
So why do we call them seperate species, slap an threatened status on one, and the other is fine?
Eco-Liberal politics at its best is why.
They are the same, you can only tell them apart because the fins of one are clipped to differentiate the 'species'.
We are paying fish counters up to $100,000 a year to track the pure fins and the clipped fins.
What a waste, and what a fraud!
If a human is born in Africa he is not different than his brother if the same parents gave birth to his brother in America!
We need to stop these lies!
If we are allowed to fish in general (fish being healthier than beef and pork) we can provide thousands of jobs... from fisherman, to flayer, to net makers, to boat makers, and more. Jobs Oregon can desperately use.
That a significant amount of these jobs would be in my district helps my cause. My opponent does not like jobs, and our district shows this. SHOW TINA KOTEK THE DOOR!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)