101

Re: 4700 vs 4690

"4700 decided to attack 4696 when we started our campaign against them. They decided to strike us and start a war with them at the same time. How is this our problem? Simple answer: its not. The leader of 4700 exhibited little to no foresight when it came to strategy. "

Gets your facts right AA. We were already attacking 96 before you and your allies decided to tag team on us.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

get your eyes checked he said you attacked 96 while they were at war with 03, which is vulturing, which means we you had no honour code and will recieve none in return

103 (edited by Ocho 09-Mar-2011 22:28:24)

Re: 4700 vs 4690

haha you're right, i guess I need glasses sad


I've said this many times before but I will say it again just for the people that fail to listen. Yes we attacked 96 when 03 was waring them, but we attacked with no knowledge of the war. Once we found out the attacks immediately stopped. The time frame of attacks was maybe 2 ticks. So no it was not vulturing and yes we do play with honor. If we did not, then we would have continued to attack 96 and ignored their war.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Ok i stand corrected. My apologies....however....

You failed to announce this so called 'war' in uni news. I say 'so called war' cuz its not a war. Its a few attacks in a small handfull of systems near 96's core area. Who you are skirmishing with is none of our concern and it has no bearing on our decision to war you guys. You are just reinforcing my earlier statement of how your family has failed at diplomacy.

You could of easily talked with 96 to establish an agreement of some kind or perhaps backed off attacking them all together to focus on us. Instead you have chosen to mislable this as a '3 on 1' battle and complain in the forums in a feeble attempt to paint us as villians.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

105

Re: 4700 vs 4690

We did not decided to strike you guys, we were just simply clearing you from our core. What are we suppose to think when you pop up in 4-5 different systems in our core, and you are very small? We did what any other fam would do. Drop and attack in NW and clear the threat. It is not an act of war, just simply protecting our selves.

106

Re: 4700 vs 4690

You're right it was not a war with 96, we were just fighting over a couple systems near there core, trying to gain position on them.

I am in no way strengthening your argument about our lack of diplomacy. My fam has done just fine, sorry we did not except 2 families larger than us to be dishonorable enough to 2 v 1 us. Pretty sure you guys are the only top families that would stoop that low. Congrats!

107 (edited by AdriusAvangion 09-Mar-2011 22:37:50)

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Yes....and you have every right to protect youreself. Just as we have every right to go to war with your family.

there is no dishonor in an alliance taking on one family. Your alliance failed at diplomacy. Simple as that. Everyone knows that you NAP and war together as an alliance to prevent exactly what is happening right now. Had your family intervened in our earlier NAP talks with your ally and protested your lack of involvement in this NAP this could of been a 2 on 2 war. But you didnt.

Like i said...you only have yourself to blame.

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

108

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Let me fix your statement for you AA "Yes....and you have every right to protect youreself. Just as we think we have every right to 2 v 1 your family."

Re: 4700 vs 4690

LOL

ok tongue

The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he, who in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children. And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who would attempt to poison and destroy my brothers. And you will know my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon thee!!

110

Re: 4700 vs 4690

I figured thats what you were meaning to say, so I figured I would play Mod and correct it for you tongue

111

Re: 4700 vs 4690

At the end of the day this is just a game and everyone plays it to have fun, but that fun is taken away when your fam is getting 2 v 1. It completely takes all the fun out of the game not being able to have to morale to fend off two attacking families.

I am just saying I figured top families would play with a little more dignity than that.

112 (edited by [Bullet] 09-Mar-2011 22:52:13)

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Can I get the facts about my fam#s involvement in this set straight:

1. We go to war with 03
2. 00 raid one of our bankers in the far south of our core, well away from them.
3. We retake most, and war with 03 continues.
4. 03 portal and jump Ocho who had made the original raid. He starts hitting us in that system. We retake.
4. Scorp raids us in the area currently being fought over.
5. War with 03 ends.
6. We start retaking Scorp's hits, and clear Ocho, who's skirmishing with Rogue in other systems as well.
7. Turns into a fight over the systems Scorp hit us in. Not total war, or anything close to it.


The order of some of those points may be up for debate, granted. But that's due to the alcohol fuelled haze hanging over the past couple of weeks. That's as best as I can remember, and maybe I've done some injustice to 00 by making it seem they did more damage than they did or something, but fact remains, we are not at war with them. Far from it, I've offered to make a NAP agreement with Artic so that he doesn't have to fight 3 fams, but he has to understand that it will now be on our terms. We can't let them stay in those systems after all that has happened.

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

113

Re: 4700 vs 4690

You have 2 # 4's bullet tongue

But yes sounds about right to me. We had assumed the war was over between you and 03 because your NW and planet count had not changed in a couple days. My fault for assuming, we should have clarified before we went on the offense.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

> Ocho wrote:

> You have 2 # 4's bullet tongue



Told you some points might be up for debate tongue

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: 4700 vs 4690

> jgriffin wrote:

> Props to whomever for keeping Purple's pop down.  o.O

Yay big_smile thank you jgriffin

" If the world flips you a Jeffrey, stroke a furry wall.. "

Re: 4700 vs 4690

4. 03 portal and jump Ocho who had made the original raid. He starts hitting us in that system. We retake.


umm... you mean 00? tongue

Re: 4700 vs 4690

lol gotta love how people say the top families dont attack the smaller families yet they magically get more planets, it must be osmosis!

118

Re: 4700 vs 4690

I didn't say they don't attack small families I said they don't 2 v 1 them. Learn to read buddy.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

> twosidedeath wrote:

> 4. 03 portal and jump Ocho who had made the original raid. He starts hitting us in that system. We retake.


umm... you mean 00? tongue


Of course. And tbh Ocho, it was only the other day that you were top 5 for NW or size or something, so you're not that small.

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

120 (edited by Ocho 10-Mar-2011 02:33:32)

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Yes I know bullet, but thats what happens when a family gets 2v1 tongue  You get knocked down quite a bit.

Re: 4700 vs 4690

"Wendy, how about play monopoly starting with one person having 10million cash and the other 10 cents. Perhaps the same fair story as here."

that's a terrible comparison, cos we all now that no one starts playing monopoly like that, cos it's not the rules...

Quit whining over fams having allies, why don't you get yours involved since you must have them & if they can't get involved cos of naps etc then that's down to the failure of your alliance surely, so just play & quit whining...

& what AA said... tongue

Miss Che Vias-Sprite
Yehes ha sowena whath dhewgh why ha 'gas henath

Be Troll Aware!

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Once again, I've given Artic the opportunity to PNAP. We shall see whether he takes it or not...

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: 4700 vs 4690

lol why is this thread still going? its not even titled correctly

Re: 4700 vs 4690

We seem to be keeping it going tongue

<Mizzle> ive been in a jailcel for the first time of my life during this night lol
<Mizzle> new experience big_smile

Re: 4700 vs 4690

Change it to 4700 vs 4703, 4690, & 4696?