51 (edited by Matrix 10-Oct-2010 12:37:53)

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

"Tobi, why dont you tell us why it happened dont tell me what to do, im sure everyone knows that we can reportal.
But i thought everyone in the alliance is fair game big_smile
guess we were wrong"

noobs do what noobs do wink
so i have no clue why someone did that..
but as said he can raze and rebuild..
so no damage done

"I mean.. if it would have happened once, id understand but twice? smile
And on 2 different attackers big_smile
tis quite lame.
can i like cpff all your portals 5 hours before the nap time end ? Ill give you comp smile"

there is a difference...
you are no noob just a semi-noob tongue



a more serious note:
someone did a mistake
it wont happen again
no damage done
and you will get some comp and an apologize
so i fail to see the problem



oh and maybe tell lee to raze the portals in areas he is not allowed in
or to say it in your words:
I mean.. if it would have happened once, id understand but twice? smile
And in 2 different sectors big_smile
tis quite lame.

Tobi

52 (edited by RickyBobby 10-Oct-2010 12:45:25)

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

As far as I know it was only 1 op, not two.  Torment is a new player that really has no concept of the game at all who we have been trying to teach.  When I put a post about checking for 90 shares to not get raided, he took it as he needed to take out the threat in order to not do it.  As soon as I saw him post the one op, I caught him to tell him to message them quickly so that they could reportal and offer two planets nearby that could be taken quickly and portalled as well.

This is one conversation from a week ago and I'll post the other monday

<Torment> i dont see how me learning the game is a bad thing
<Torment> i asked if i should nukle and u went stupid
<Torment> nuke*
<Nap|Fish|Eat> Isn't it common sense that you shouldn't be nuking anyone atm when we go to war in a few hours?
<Torment> ok well obviously i dint know
<Torment> didnt
<Nap|Fish|Eat> Can you get another Spy on target of captain janeway in 91
<Torment> ok
<Torment> all i want is to learn the game u need to realise that not everyone knows as much a u
<Nap|Fish|Eat> Yes but there is enough of it that should be common sense.
<Nap|Fish|Eat> =P Problem is you remind me too much of Arganon
<Torment> what should be
<Torment> ?
<Torment> yeah well im not im torment
<Torment> lol
<Nap|Fish|Eat> lol
<Torment> i do like to learn
<Torment> and once i learn then yeah

I'll post the conversation of the 90 thing after war starts due to it involves the forum message that he misunderstood which is part of the strategy.

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

wow and he finds 2 good portals and sabs em cus he dont know what hes doing LOL BS that is pal, all u guys have done since the word go is think of how to use underhand tactics

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

ah lee... since you fail to answer ingame msgs...

Week 28, 13, to Captain Janeway of Captain Janeway (4191)

1 weeks xx,yy:z1 Captain Janeway (4191) In transit Recall

0 weeks xx,yy:z2 Captain Janeway (4191) In attack range Recall


you not allowed there...

please remove defense.
thnx

Tobi

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

how about no?

until this matter of this nap break has been resolved, im not giving up shit

56 (edited by RickyBobby 10-Oct-2010 12:48:39)

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

It was only ONE portal, Lee as far I know. If he was intentionally trying to break nap, wouldn't it have made more sense if he had mass sabbed every share?

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Sounds good, thanks for the explanation. As I understand it, reportalling is np, so not much harm done imo.

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Euhm, who#s this??? I thought that account died a long long time ago, when thorn and CoP quit, and there was no use for a 3-way account we could use all 3.

Hell, i dont even remember the login off it :s

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Hehe hey Crazy, this is CoP wink, I did still remember the login of it. Can't seem to change the forum name though.

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

well well well, you started playing again. Looks like you cant keep away forever tongue

I survived the Test? of 12-4-03, anyone remember that?

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

big_smile he opped my portal too wink so it were 2 portals. But it's ok i can reportal

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

@ Lee


I gave him a list of planets of mine to send to earlier in the round. He thought hey were nuke coords and nuked me =/


Anyways you guys are all lame and whiners. This round doesn't interest me anymore.

Sex without the e is still SX!

63 (edited by Arganon 10-Oct-2010 13:36:36)

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Ricky and AA stop arguing with thsee smucks lets waste em and be over with it BAH ! smile

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

No round interests you Nolio, only whining about it does

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Don't insult the great Nobliolioliolio, he may smite you with his mighty pink fluffy dildo, which he borrowed from Primo yikes

Rhinos have poor eyesight, but with what they weigh, it`s not their problem.

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol When people can sit down, plan a war, go through with the war and just have fun, I'll be interested. The extra bs that comes around lately is not interesting. I'm not gonna spend the next two weeks debating nap breaks and hidden agendas. Better things to do in life than that.

Sex without the e is still SX!

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

well Lee...as mentioned by your allies...its okay...so please remove your defenses from those planets that are in breach of nap NOW.

thank you

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

its ok? why cus there too pussy to say anything to you? if it was me personally i would have voided the nap as soon as i saw aggressive ops, and h4e lame excuse is the worse excuse i ever did hear

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

> Lee wrote:

> its ok? why cus there too pussy to say anything to you? if it was me personally i would have voided the nap as soon as i saw aggressive ops, and h4e lame excuse is the worse excuse i ever did hear

yes, let us be childish and irrational, that is how the community of ic rolls smile

"Ed's a bit of a trouble maker, in other words, he's an asshole" - Archangel 2007

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

u know im right thats why ED

1st of all 99 cannot fight me alone, they have to get there allies to cancel LOLOLOL
also
then 99 also start sabbin 90's portals, what a joke lmao, i forgot ED thats how the ic community rolls?

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

"1st of all 99 cannot fight me alone, they have to get there allies to cancel LOLOLOL"

who was the guy that got 30 mil iron ally aid..
just curios

"then 99 also start sabbin 90's portals, what a joke lmao, i forgot ED thats how the ic community rolls?"

correct would be a noob in 99 sabed two portals that will be reportaled bevor war starts.



btw i msg you 3 days ago to remove defense on one of those planets
and you never did... instead you explored a second and portaled that one up too...
and now you wont give up both because of those sabs...
sure
and you want that your allies breake nap...

Tobi

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

erm 3 days ago u didnt msg me shit u liar it was yesterday ROFL

73 (edited by Matrix 10-Oct-2010 15:12:39)

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

Week 46, 11, to Captain Janeway of Captain Janeway (4191)

1069 Fighters
1069 Droids
22 Transports 0 weeks xx,yy:z Captain Janeway (4191) In attack range Recall


------------------------

so it was 4 days ago tongue  so yes i lied tongue


same fleet that i msg you yesterday.. just a bit smaller because alot disbanded tongue

Tobi

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

lol Lee, 97 cancelling had nothing to do with you.  It was planned Within 2 ticks of your allies aiding you over market wink  Only difference is DragonSoup fell asleep after a late night and woke up like 3 hours late to cancel from the planned time.

Re: 4197/4199 vs 4190/4191

bs