Topic: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Since there is a finite amount of doctors and money to support healthcare, I thought how can it have survived for so long.


Then I determined they put those costs off to the future in a variety of means including limiting proceedures and the line method.

Let us first work on the line method. If you have X number of patients needing a specific procedure, and you can only afford so many (Z), then one way to correct the imbalance is to wait for some to die as you progress the line. Thus we have X - Y = Z. Now due to the system you can claim you have 100% coverage while in truth Z/X is your coverage rate.

Y does not need to be deaths, it can be those who sought coverage elsewhere, those who's conditions improved on their own, and so forth.

Due to the nature of things the end of the line would not be 'the end of the line' due to eventual evening out over the length of the line.


As well we need worry about age. Typically the older you get the more costly you get (age 0 to 3 being the exception). This curve dramatically turns in the last 6 months to 2 years of your life. This need not be of old age. And yet we, and our families fight for that extra hope that survival will happen.

So the government starts to determine odds and to play the safe bets, letting people die even if there was hope (A woman in my state was told no for an experimental drug, but was offered a drug cocktail that would end her life, no joke).

The Government also must be frugal. This means less drug medicines that cost lots to make, and more chep stuff. This means less advanced equipment and more bookings to use it. For instance lines for the few MRI devices, lines for complex chemistry kits, and so forth. This also means in disasters more lives lost due to inabaility to have extra sitting free, but I digress.

At times this means some things run out so that doctors must try to be sparing in their usage.

Then we have limiting of procedures so the services of flexible doctors can be forcibly redirected to meet the needs of other area's. This also is a frugal thing, but seperate.

And we have the voter apathy chosen issues such as breast cancer vs other cancers, AIDS vs real diseases (yes I contend AIDS is a made up thing consisting of anything that temporarily or permamently reduces your immune count, it is misdiagnosis, mistreatment, a waste of funds and malpractice), or the current scare vs the real current issue.

Thus we suddenly have billions misspent on Avaian or Swine Flu, and less treatment for pancreatic cancer or heart disease.


Socialist medicine is designed to look good at the text, look moderate in the eyes, and be poorly in reality.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Umm, HIV is not a made up disease. However, it is overrated. Only 1% of the US population has it, and it has a 1/2500 female to male transmission ratio, and 1/1,250 male to female transmission ratio. In countries with poor health services, it is a concern. But in the West, it is only a concern to same-sex relationships and drug users. While it should be taught, it does not need special consideration to the point of people distributing condoms to reduce HIV infection, to scare people about it, or have all these free HIV tests available.

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

1% US AIDS rate? I can't find a figure estimating over .3% Seems high to me. But I guess I don't associate with the types of filth that get AIDS and other STDs.

Personally, I like deadly STDs. Oh my gawd it kills whores! I don't care!

Now to wait for the trolls. They'll pretend socialized healthcare is "free." They'll ignore the fact that long wait times kill people. They'll pretend that they somehow have access to the latest medical technology when their hospitals have no financial means to purchase it. They'll pretend that all of the latest life-saving procedures and treatments are approved and covered for cancer and other disease care, no matter the age of the patient. It's no secret that many treatments are not approved, not covered under any universal coverage. But somehow troll supporters of single-payer coverage repeatedly make this claim that nobody else would make or believe.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

There are millions of Americans who cannot get ANY health care, I would prefer a system that tried to cure me rather then one that decided i was too poor to treat.

As for AIDS victims being scum? IN America there are cases of infected blood transfusions etc In Africa babies are being born with the illness, describing these people as filth seems misguided at best.

Also our hospitals have trillions of pounds of funds generated by national insurance payments, its a misguided idea that health care is free in UK, every single working person pays insurance by law - however if you have a complication in surgery during pregnancy you are not then charged an extra $135,000 as happened to my american friend in the states- Now she has to choose between paying bills or feeding her baby.

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Private health clinics do exist in many nations with public health care. So for the people willing to pay for it, top notch healthcare is available. Quality of the regular healthcare is top notch however. Tales of people dying on the waiting list differs per country. In some nations it's not an issue. For other nations the problem is caused by a lack of specialist etc, not so much the system itself.

Je maintiendrai

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

There are millions of Americans who cannot get ANY health care, I would prefer a system that tried to cure me rather then one that decided i was too poor to treat.<<


Say what?  Everybody can walk into an emergency room and get seen. Granted it is in order of the seriousness so you can be there 8 hours but you get seen.  If you can't pay too bad, sucks to be the county.
People get benefits for being low income, its just some large longterm treatment that isnt covered and some dental work.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

"And we have the voter apathy chosen issues such as breast cancer vs other cancers, AIDS vs real diseases (yes I contend AIDS is a made up thing consisting of anything that temporarily or permamently reduces your immune count, it is misdiagnosis, mistreatment, a waste of funds and malpractice), or the current scare vs the real current issue."

Do you have any data to back up that, or it is just your opinion?

And

http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_lif_exp_at_bir_tot_pop-life-expectancy-birth-total-population

Why do you have a median life expectancy?

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

you guys have twitter?

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

how about loosening the regs on patented medicines so the prices of medicines sold to the hospitals plummets? soon as the hospitals aren't spending most of their money paying for unneccesarily overpriced medications they can afford to buy better equipment and hire more staff etc, providing a better standard of care. and don't give me that shit about them needing to keep the prices high to fund back into research. i know research is expensive and necessary, but with the sheer amount of medicines that get used even reducing the cost slightly would only really effect the high bonuses that the management cream off the top

<@Nick> it always scares me when KT gets all dominatrixy
* I_like_pie is now known as pie|bbl
<@KT|afk> Look at him run!
<@Nick> if you tell him to slap you and call you mommy
<@Nick> i'm leaving and never coming back

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

>>As for AIDS victims being scum? IN America there are cases of infected blood transfusions etc In Africa babies are being born with the illness, describing these people as filth seems misguided at best.<<

Medical errors are a minority of infections. Obviously I did not mean that I literally do not care about AIDS victims. I was merely pointing out that, while my heart goes out to victims of medical errors and those born with the disease to trashy parents, the root cause of the spread of the disease is trashy behavior and I don't care in the least about the majority of its victims. Little over your head, at best. Sorry. There it is all explained out for you.

>>however if you have a complication in surgery during pregnancy you are not then charged an extra $135,000 as happened to my american friend in the states- Now she has to choose between paying bills or feeding her baby.<<

Tell her to read her insurance policy next time and not buy a bad one. It's not that hard. I read mine. Had more than $1,000,000 in medical work and didn't pay an extra dime. Boo hoo your irresponsible friend got what she bought. Makes me so sad that she could possibly be responsible to run her own life. Your solution to her buying a crappy policy is to force me to pay more for lower quality care. Sorry, I don't like what you're selling. Most people don't. It's so bad you need government to force it on people.

>>For other nations the problem is caused by a lack of specialist etc, not so much the system itself.<<

Presuming, of course, that the system doesn't cause the shortage. And there's no evidence of that. Nor logic to explain how it happens. Err, I mean does't happen. Oops.

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

"Tell her to read her insurance policy next time and not buy a bad one. It's not that hard. I read mine. Had more than $1,000,000 in medical work and didn't pay an extra dime. Boo hoo your irresponsible friend got what she bought. Makes me so sad that she could possibly be responsible to run her own life. Your solution to her buying a crappy policy is to force me to pay more for lower quality care. Sorry, I don't like what you're selling. Most people don't. It's so bad you need government to force it on people."

Government force on people Universal care? There would be a revolution in every country who has it ,if any politician try to abolish it... and

"Your solution to her buying a crappy policy is to force me to pay more for lower quality care" USA already pays more... and the quality is not that better...

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

You're right. It's only people's lives. You judge some as not very valuable, so who cares if the inferior care you propose kills them. You have the right to decide, after all!

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Presuming, of course, that the system doesn't cause the shortage. And there's no evidence of that. Nor logic to explain how it happens. Err, I mean does't happen. Oops.

The reason why there is a shortage in one nation and an excess in another is because job migration in the EU is still difficult, we are free to move to another European nation and apply for a job there. But especially in the medical field, where foreign diploma's are not always accepted, things are more difficult.

For instance, someone with a German diploma will have to go to a Dutch university and start learning all over again (from a certain point) to get a Dutch diploma. Then there is the language barrier as well, which for a German is easy to overcome, but not for a Frenchman or a Spaniard. This works both ways, ofcourse.

Je maintiendrai

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Have you always had to import your doctors?

[I wish I could obey forum rules]

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

For certain specialisations, yes.

Je maintiendrai

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

I live in a country with nationalised health care.

My country has a longer life expectancy than the USA.

tweehonderd graden, dat is waarom ze me mr. fahrenheit noemen, ik reis aan de snelheid van het licht, ik ga een supersonische man van u maken

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Your country lies to you.

Or you lie to yourself



1) Infant mortality rates, all births with a pulse in the United States are counted as "Live Births" not in your nation

2) Your nation does not account for non-health related deaths when making the health care claims of life expectancy, my nation includes 100% of deaths regardless of source.



When will you admit this? I have beaten you over the head for years with this. You keep coming back, its like you are brainwashed and cannot admit information that is shown, proven, and such.

Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

The CIA statistics office rates the USA as 34th best life expectancy rate, behind many countries with nationalised health.

The great source of wikipedia ranks the USA at 38th - So a site run by leftist liberals makes you 38th but your own CIA ranks you 34th,

Now i am no expert but in the UK with our shambolic health system the CIA ranks us 25th.....thats better then 34th right?

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

ACtually Flint I've never seen you say that before, nor have you provided any sources.

The CIA world factbook (which is a trusted and an American source) is favourable to the UK compared to the USA on both stats and I can't see any caveats about counting methods there. I didn't even know the stat about the infant mortality until you just mentioned it, so it would be strange to claim that I was brainwashed.

Both stats are strong evidence of superior health care in the UK. There obviously could be numerous other factors but clearly people in the UK are not hugely disadvantaged in health care provision.

tweehonderd graden, dat is waarom ze me mr. fahrenheit noemen, ik reis aan de snelheid van het licht, ik ga een supersonische man van u maken

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

>>Both stats are strong evidence of superior health care in the UK. There obviously could be numerous other factors but clearly people in the UK are not hugely disadvantaged in health care provision.<<

Right, a country where you can be denied surgery on a broken arm because you smoke.

you're behind Macau and Hong Kong, so I guess 900 years of democracy was wasted.

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

21 (edited by &#9773; Fokker 25-May-2010 19:51:55)

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

> [TI] Sitting Duck wrote:
> I live in a country with nationalised health care.
My country has a longer life expectancy than the USA. <

This is not true.
You have been lied to by your government, which is part of an international conspiracy to keep us all too happy and stupid to realise we are drones, doing jobs that are ultimately just pointless busy work designed to make us think that each and every one of us matters in some small way, whilst we believe that we will all be rewarded at the end for our dedication, loyalty, and self sacrifice, with early retirement, Saga holidays, and a 50+ funeral plan.
The reality of the world is that hospitals that put patients before profit without collapsing are a fiction, an insidious illusion cast upon the world by the uber-fascist Liberal Democrat Party, who are clearly in league with Satan.

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

"Right, a country where you can be denied surgery on a broken arm because you smoke."

That has never happened in this country.....ever.

Seriously....ever!

Some lefties were suggesting that as smokers drain the NHS they should be made to go private but it was very quickly shouted down.

Behind Hong Kong? Still ahead of you tongue

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

> Some lefties were suggesting that as smokers drain the NHS they should be made to go private but it was very quickly shouted down. <

Actually that particular argument went away because someone asked "Wait. After we get rid of the smokers, and their tax revenue, won't we have to take a paycut?"

"So, it's defeat for you, is it? Someday I must meet a similar fate..."

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

> Khaz Modan wrote:

> "Right, a country where you can be denied surgery on a broken arm because you smoke."

That has never happened in this country.....ever.

Seriously....ever!

Some lefties were suggesting that as smokers drain the NHS they should be made to go private but it was very quickly shouted down.<<<

For the 2nd Time:

Dont click the link if you're eating
_____________________________________________________________________________

A plumber whose arm was left twisted grotesquely out of shape in an accident ten months ago has had an operation to correct it 'cancelled four times'.
Torron Eeles, 50, has been left unable to work since falling down the stairs and now fears he may lose his home after being denied incapacity benefit.

The father-of-three today hit out at the NHS for the 'unacceptable delays', but East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust said Mr Eeles had his operation cancelled on 'only' two occasions on clinical safety grounds.

His left arm has hung limply by his side since he fractured the humerus bone in December 2008.

Mr Eeles, from Welham Green, Hertfordshire, applied for employment and support allowance but a doctor ruled he is ineligible for both because he can turn on a tap.

He said: 'This whole situation is absolutely disgusting. I have never heard of anyone else having a broken arm for ten months.
'It's been so long the bones have knitted back together. Sleeping is really uncomfortable because whenever I roll over my arm gets in the way.

'I'm a kitchen fitter and plumber by trade but I can't even slice a loaf of bread let alone work.

'This has been going on and on and it's a complete nightmare.'
Mr Eeles fractured his arm on December 3 and was rushed straight to casualty where doctors put his arm in plaster.

But within a few weeks a specialist said the bones were too far apart and that surgeons would have to insert a metal plate because there was too much movement in the arm.

Mr Eeles claims his first two operations at the Queen Elizabeth II hospital in Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, were cancelled due to a lack of beds and operating time respectively.

His third operation in February was postponed after he was found to have high blood pressure, while the fourth, scheduled for May, was abandoned because of concerns about his smoking.
The plaster was removed from Mr Eeles' arm after three months and he was given a wrist sling, which he branded 'totally useless'.


He said: 'My arm just flops about but the sling wasn't doing anything. The plaster didn't make a blind bit of difference after a couple of weeks either.

'How the Jobcentre can say I'm fit I don't know. I was on incapacity benefit until a few weeks ago when I went to be assessed by a doctor in Luton.

'He said because I can turn on a tap and I can lift my arm I don't qualify for help.

'Now I'm worried about losing my house. I've got a mortgage on it and there are credit cards debts I'm struggling to pay because I can't work.'

Nick Carver, the chief executive of the East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, insisted computer records showed the trust had only cancelled two operations and that proceeding with the operations could have put Mr Eeles's life at risk.

Mr Carver said: 'Mr Eeles' operation was cancelled only twice - and then both on clinical safety grounds.

'The first time was back in February when his blood pressure was found to be high.

'As his surgery was not an emergency, our surgeons took the right action in referring Mr Eeles to his GP so his blood pressure could be brought under control.

'His second operation in May 2009 was also cancelled, this time because he had failed to act on our surgeon's advice that Mr Eeles that he should give up smoking.

'In cancelling Mr Eeles' two operation dates, our surgeons were acting on clinical grounds only.

'If they are guilty of anything, then it is of having the best clinical interests of their patients at heart.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1218927/Plumber-shattered-arm-left-horrifically-bent-shape-operation-cancelled-times.html#ixzz0oyAZjXKk
______________________________________________________________________________________



"His second operation in May 2009 was also cancelled, this time because he had failed to act on our surgeon's advice that Mr Eeles that he should give up smoking."

The core joke of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is that of course no civilization would develop personal computers with instant remote database recovery, and then waste this technology to find good drinks.
Steve Jobs has ruined this joke.

Re: An Analysis of Public Health Care

Yes it turns out this story was bollocks invented by the daily mail - the only time surgery can be cancelled due to health concerns is if the risk of death outweighs the gain in the quality of life.

This is the same daily mail who claimed that fallout 3 had been created by Al Quieda to brain wash Americans into nuking washington.