What is the defined make up of a radio wave You_Fool?
And where did I even say 100% efficiency?
And why the obvious flame attack? Can The Yell please step on this rude attack pls?
What we have here is an interesting change in science, with an interesting story.
It is 100% new in science, no one else has done it yet, and it has interesting applications, but we will not know more until more information is applied.
This is an application of a wave disrupting the foundation of the bond between the atoms. It also happens to heat either the water or the resulting gases, or the salt I guess... to a combustion level, or triggers combustion on it's own. This seems to be rather unique in and of itself also.
Finally it goes also to say that waves can be interesting. Some waves break up upon contact with solids, some waves bend (like light), some waves reflect, some waves lose strength but continue, and some waves will suffer attrition.
The waves also will have a barrier distance where most of it will be decayed, if not utterly, to uselessness. But the question remains can these waves affect a larger area than a test tube? How much bigger? Some waves can very effectively be sent power wise in real life, but some are extremely costly.
The topic was meant in humor, your blatant attack however seems to not be writ in humor.
My humor is because the guy is curing cancer with a novel new idea and his stuff also seems to be possibly a new power method as well.
Everything bad in the economy is now Obama's fault. Every job lost, all the debt, all the lost retirement funds. All Obama. Are you happy now? We all get to blame Obama!
Kemp currently not being responded to until he makes CONCISE posts.
Avogardo and Noir ignored by me for life so people know why I do not respond to them. (Informational)