Which reminds me, I get the same shitty service at watering holes when I tip $10 bills + a few ones a good number of times even on cheap evenings. I want to be nice -- okay, let's be honest, I want to ensure that I always look good -- but it seems that most bartenders aren't bright enough to notice one's high tipping or decent enough to not suck even if they do anyway. What I'm saying is, if they're not even productive enough to work for my $20 tip when I'm only spending $50, can you imagine how horrible their service would be if their income was based upon my earnings, not the service they provide for me!? Oh, I get a headache just thinking about it. And it causes crime. I'm 15% more likely to strike a bartender tonight because of wealth distribution. Ask my bartenders if that benefits them!

You're right. It's only people's lives. You judge some as not very valuable, so who cares if the inferior care you propose kills them. You have the right to decide, after all!

is gonna sit back and watch women get drunk as hell so he can wake up in the mornin' with a story to tell

>>As for AIDS victims being scum? IN America there are cases of infected blood transfusions etc In Africa babies are being born with the illness, describing these people as filth seems misguided at best.<<

Medical errors are a minority of infections. Obviously I did not mean that I literally do not care about AIDS victims. I was merely pointing out that, while my heart goes out to victims of medical errors and those born with the disease to trashy parents, the root cause of the spread of the disease is trashy behavior and I don't care in the least about the majority of its victims. Little over your head, at best. Sorry. There it is all explained out for you.

>>however if you have a complication in surgery during pregnancy you are not then charged an extra $135,000 as happened to my american friend in the states- Now she has to choose between paying bills or feeding her baby.<<

Tell her to read her insurance policy next time and not buy a bad one. It's not that hard. I read mine. Had more than $1,000,000 in medical work and didn't pay an extra dime. Boo hoo your irresponsible friend got what she bought. Makes me so sad that she could possibly be responsible to run her own life. Your solution to her buying a crappy policy is to force me to pay more for lower quality care. Sorry, I don't like what you're selling. Most people don't. It's so bad you need government to force it on people.

>>For other nations the problem is caused by a lack of specialist etc, not so much the system itself.<<

Presuming, of course, that the system doesn't cause the shortage. And there's no evidence of that. Nor logic to explain how it happens. Err, I mean does't happen. Oops.

1% US AIDS rate? I can't find a figure estimating over .3% Seems high to me. But I guess I don't associate with the types of filth that get AIDS and other STDs.

Personally, I like deadly STDs. Oh my gawd it kills whores! I don't care!

Now to wait for the trolls. They'll pretend socialized healthcare is "free." They'll ignore the fact that long wait times kill people. They'll pretend that they somehow have access to the latest medical technology when their hospitals have no financial means to purchase it. They'll pretend that all of the latest life-saving procedures and treatments are approved and covered for cancer and other disease care, no matter the age of the patient. It's no secret that many treatments are not approved, not covered under any universal coverage. But somehow troll supporters of single-payer coverage repeatedly make this claim that nobody else would make or believe.

>>By removing my arguement for poverty not being the only cause for crime<<

...What? Are we 5? You had to state that there are more influences on crime rates than poverty? And 2+2 is 4. And water is wet.

>>you yourself created the simplistic view that crime is a direct consequence of poverty.<<

Not only did I never advocate such a position, but it was you operating under this assumption in claiming that welfare reduces crime, which I argued against.

I've stated about 5 times now that I was taking issue with your claim regarding welfare and crime, not poverty and crime.

German budget deficit to break EU rules in 2010
http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1231921022.85/

That they haven't managed to cut your costs in ways which you find objectionable yet isn't a sign that their spending is sustainable. It's just a sign that it's so unsustainable that no measures to correct it can be passed without unrest.

What Mr. Balsz said is accurate. If you disagree with him, you are wrong.

once pwned a guy at origami so hard he gave it up

[]

is a homo, jealous of Kemp's gay climaxing skeleton avatar, also violating V.Kemp's 1 rule: No Homo.

Loves Me