> Deci wrote:

i'm assuming you have some sort of brilliant logic behind that conclusion. please elaborate.>

Post #36

As avo implies, women are depreciating assets. They lose their value as they gain age. So if you are in your 20s and date a woman 10 years older than you, that means you are dating a woman with less value than the ones your own age. If you are doing that it suggests poor value on your part, and yes some older women like young boy toys.

And yes, I have regrettably slept with women older than me. The oldest was 29 (Now 7 years older). On the bright side, she was my first and taught me mad skillz!

No we're the Empire, and everyone knows that Imperials claim and adapt the accomplishments of lesser people as their own.

> V.Kemp wrote:

> lol. I think he's brilliant. He proposes giving everyone everything they need without taxing anyone. How awesome is that!>

I know, it really is brilliant!

And people like him can indulge in slave labor to guarantee that I have everything I need!

Ordos?

On one hand he's harmless and sometimes entertaining. On the other hand he's irritating when he's not entertaining.

> Schniepel wrote:

> do they teach you that einstein was an american?
i just wonder>

Yup. They teach that he was a naturalized US citizen born in Germany, who fled to the US to escape those Nazis.

Faraday was a physicist, I mean it would be weired to put Theater there.

And how the hell did Ordos get a job?

Seems like the liberals have no argument to continue.

btw I'm still alive, hahaha!

Naw they just say that.

They know deep down that American culture is Western, and Americans are Westerners.

> avogadro wrote:

> >I said that gays are being discriminated against for not being allowed to marry the person they love.

i love maria sharaprova but im not allowed to marry her! im being discriminated against!>

No you don't. I love her!

Viser,

Yeah well to me work is a source of unhappiness, they should get over it. We can't be accommodating with other people's happiness when it is under their control to be happy or not, especially not when it comes at the expense of practical considerations.

Imperial,

Because you use a body organ for something other than the function designed by natural selection, does not make it an abomination. We do this all the time. We use fingers and mouths to enhance sexuality, even when our mouth was designed for nutritional intake among others. There is no conceivable benefit of using the mouth for sex, but we do it anyway. If you commit to this principle, then you morally can not use the mouth or work the fingers. Furthermore, no sex toys either! Women can't use dildos and men can't use flesh bots.

We do the same with tools. Though a spoon is not designed to eat soup, a soup spoon is, we can still use one as an alternative even if it's inefficient to do so. We may even use a spoon as an alternative when a fork is more efficient and considered appropriate, if the situation demands it.

Sticking it in a guy's butt is no different. Nonetheless, I find the prospect of it disgusting and I am a vagina addict, but it doesn't work to use the natural function argument. However, you could say that there is something biologically wrong with the person, because based on the principles of evolution homosexuals should have been selected out of the population long ago. There is a biological answer to this, and it's that a gene that is beneficial to one gender is not for another.

> Wild Flower Soul wrote:

> The typical American answer to something they don't understand >

I invite you to join the war on TI. We can make a new clan .